You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@creadur.apache.org by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> on 2013/07/06 19:53:22 UTC
Ready to Announce The Release ...? [WAS Re: Setting Up Release Directory...?]
On 06/19/13 14:38, sebb wrote:
<snip>
> Sorry about the repeated checkins; I think it's all OK now.
Great :)
Am I safe to announce the release now...?
Robert
Re: Ready to Announce The Release ...? [WAS Re: Setting Up Release
Directory...?]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 07/07/13 20:14, sebb wrote:
> On 7 July 2013 11:07, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 07/07/13 01:03, sebb wrote:
<snip>
>> Probably worthwhile doing a limited announcement (creadur website and so on)
>
> The creadur RAT site includes download links to 0.9 but is headed 0.9-SNAPSHOT.
I was wondering about giving Creadur a little bit more of a suite feel
by including a download section on the top level website
Robert
Re: Ready to Announce The Release ...? [WAS Re: Setting Up Release Directory...?]
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 7 July 2013 11:07, Robert Burrell Donkin
<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 07/07/13 01:03, sebb wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>
>> Note that 0.9 takes much very longer than 0.8 if there are long files
>> that don't contain the license near the start.
>> This is because 0.9 has several extra scanners, all of which are very
>> inefficient on such files.
>> 0.8 only had one such scanner.
>>
>> I've fixed these issues in SVN.
>
>
> :-)
>
>
>> So maybe worth holding off until 0.91 (or whatever) can be released.
>
>
> Should we sort out the binary assembly before cutting a new release or just
> rush out what's in trunk...?
I think we should fix the binary assembly; should not be too difficult.
>
>> Anyone that wants 0.9 has probably already fetched it from Maven ...
>
>
> True
>
> Probably worthwhile doing a limited announcement (creadur website and so on)
The creadur RAT site includes download links to 0.9 but is headed 0.9-SNAPSHOT.
> Robert
Re: Ready to Announce The Release ...? [WAS Re: Setting Up Release
Directory...?]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 07/07/13 01:03, sebb wrote:
<snip>
> Note that 0.9 takes much very longer than 0.8 if there are long files
> that don't contain the license near the start.
> This is because 0.9 has several extra scanners, all of which are very
> inefficient on such files.
> 0.8 only had one such scanner.
>
> I've fixed these issues in SVN.
:-)
> So maybe worth holding off until 0.91 (or whatever) can be released.
Should we sort out the binary assembly before cutting a new release or
just rush out what's in trunk...?
> Anyone that wants 0.9 has probably already fetched it from Maven ...
True
Probably worthwhile doing a limited announcement (creadur website and so on)
Robert
Re: Ready to Announce The Release ...? [WAS Re: Setting Up Release Directory...?]
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 6 July 2013 18:53, Robert Burrell Donkin
<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 06/19/13 14:38, sebb wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Sorry about the repeated checkins; I think it's all OK now.
>
>
> Great :)
>
> Am I safe to announce the release now...?
I think so.
Note that 0.9 takes much very longer than 0.8 if there are long files
that don't contain the license near the start.
This is because 0.9 has several extra scanners, all of which are very
inefficient on such files.
0.8 only had one such scanner.
I've fixed these issues in SVN.
So maybe worth holding off until 0.91 (or whatever) can be released.
Anyone that wants 0.9 has probably already fetched it from Maven ...
> Robert
>