You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com> on 1997/08/16 22:00:03 UTC

Re: config/783: RLimitMEM, RLimitCPU, hard limit ignored when userid is not 0 (fwd)

The following reply was made to PR config/783; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>
To: Apache bugs database <ap...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: config/783: RLimitMEM, RLimitCPU, hard limit ignored when userid is not 0 (fwd)
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 13:41:26 -0600 (MDT)

 
 
 
 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 14:33:04 +0000
 From: George Carrette <Ge...@iacnet.com>
 To: Dean Gaudet <dg...@iacnet.com>
 Cc: George Carrette <ge...@iacnet.com>,
     apache-bugdb <ap...@iacnet.com>
 Subject: Re: config/783: RLimitMEM, RLimitCPU, hard limit ignored when userid is not 0
 
 I think the reason the check for userid == 0 was originally in the code
 was that setrlimit will fail completely, failing even to set the soft limit,
 if you call it with a structure which will attempt to set the hard limit 
 upward.
 
 So whoever put the check in was trying to be nice and at least allow some
 limit to be set.
 
 That is why I left the check in, and simply made the algorithm consistent
 with the comment and error message.
 
 By the way, I've got another bug fix, not yet read, to RLimitMEM and RLimitCPU.
 
 The bug is that these are only in effect for cgi scripts and server side 
 include exec's.
 But I've been using the Perl Module stuff, with people who had buggy perl code.
 
 So I've made a modification that allows you to configure RLimit's inside of 
 child_main.
 
 It is really essential for general use of Perl Module when debugging Perl code
 that behaves differently in the slightly different environment.
 
 Anyway, I've got to clean that stuff up first.