You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hbase.apache.org by John Lilley <jo...@redpoint.net> on 2016/01/26 17:25:06 UTC
Is HBase standalone viable for production?
We would like to build software using HBase and Phoenix without necessarily requiring the Hadoop ecosystem for smaller deployments and I have some basic concerns:
-- Is this a viable strategy?
-- Does HBase/Pheonix standalone ever get used in production?
-- Does this configuration get Tested?
-- Is standalone HBase crippled in any significant way (other than redundancy and lack of scaling, obviously)
Thanks
John
Re: Is HBase standalone viable for production?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Sorry for the late response John.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:25 AM, John Lilley <jo...@redpoint.net>
wrote:
> We would like to build software using HBase and Phoenix without
> necessarily requiring the Hadoop ecosystem for smaller deployments and I
> have some basic concerns:
> -- Is this a viable strategy?
> -- Does HBase/Pheonix standalone ever get used in production?
>
I've heard of instances of HBase being used standalone in production
(caveat the 'obviously' clause you note later in this email) to do things
like host an opentsdb instance on a medium sized cluster.
> -- Does this configuration get Tested?
>
Its how we do most of our unit testing and this is what most of us dev
against.
> -- Is standalone HBase crippled in any significant way (other than
> redundancy and lack of scaling, obviously)
>
>
Not that I know of.
St.Ack
> Thanks
> John
>