You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com> on 2010/01/27 03:59:28 UTC
ant download-selenium returns build fail error
According to the documentation, I should be able to download the
necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
ant download-selenium
This returns the following error:
Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main Build".
for Release 9.04 version 899857
Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version 899857?
Regards,
Ruth
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
It was a bit a troll ;o)
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman" <rh...@aesolves.com>
> Hi Jacques:
> I mean "greatest". It is the greatest! Just because I'm always
> complaining about things doesn't mean I don't think its great. All these
> contributions are really wonderful to see.
> Ruth
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Hi Ruth,
>>
>> I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to
>> put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe it's only
>> my paranonia ;o).
>> I much more clear, thanks!
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Ruth Hoffman" <rh...@aesolves.com>
>>> Done.
>>> Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit.
>>> Regards,
>>> Ruth
>>>
>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> From: "Scott Gray" <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add
>>>> whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any
>>>> confusion.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com>.
Hi Jacques:
I mean "greatest". It is the greatest! Just because I'm always
complaining about things doesn't mean I don't think its great. All these
contributions are really wonderful to see.
Ruth
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Ruth,
>
> I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to
> put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe it's only
> my paranonia ;o).
> I much more clear, thanks!
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Ruth Hoffman" <rh...@aesolves.com>
>> Done.
>> Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit.
>> Regards,
>> Ruth
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> From: "Scott Gray" <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add
>>> whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any
>>> confusion.
>>>
>>> +1
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
I changed the title back so that it doesn't break any existing links in the mail archives.
Regards
Scott
On 27/01/2010, at 3:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Ruth,
>
> I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe it's only my paranonia ;o).
> I much more clear, thanks!
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Ruth Hoffman" <rh...@aesolves.com>
>> Done.
>> Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit.
>> Regards,
>> Ruth
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> From: "Scott Gray" <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any confusion.
>>>
>>> +1
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
> Hi Ruth,
>
> I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe
> it's only my paranonia ;o).
> I much more clear, thanks!
Typo : It's much more clear, thanks!
Jacques
> Jacques
>
> From: "Ruth Hoffman" <rh...@aesolves.com>
>> Done.
>> Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit.
>> Regards,
>> Ruth
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> From: "Scott Gray" <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users
>>> avoid any confusion.
>>>
>>> +1
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi Ruth,
I had a look it's ok with me (you and your unconscious could resist to put an almost sarcastic"greatest functionality", but maybe
it's only my paranonia ;o).
I much more clear, thanks!
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman" <rh...@aesolves.com>
> Done.
> Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit.
> Regards,
> Ruth
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> From: "Scott Gray" <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users
>> avoid any confusion.
>>
>> +1
>> Jacques
>>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com>.
Done.
Please, if you don't like, change it as you see fit.
Regards,
Ruth
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> From: "Scott Gray" <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>
> I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add
> whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any
> confusion.
>
> +1
> Jacques
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
From: "Scott Gray" <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>
I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users avoid
any confusion.
+1
Jacques
Regards
Scott
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Hi Ruth
Yes I can understand how it might lead to confusion, the bottom line is that the release branches receive only bug fixes and nothing else. I think Hans was pointing you to that document to show that Selenium was listed as being introduced after the creation of the 9.04 branch and hence the feature isn't available to it.
I hear you're pretty good at documentation, please feel free to add whatever information you think is required to help users avoid any confusion.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 27/01/2010, at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Scott:
> Actually, no where on that page does it say "trunk". What it does say is "...approximately to changes since Release 4.0..." which could potentially lead new users - looking for more information about various release contents - to assume that these changes apply to OFBiz releases.
>
> So, I'm back to my original question concerning whether or not Selenium support is in 9.04. I was told to read this document and everything it pointed to. I did. And...I made some incorrect assumptions.
>
> I made the original request on the User's mailing list. I'm a user and not a committer. How am I suppose to know that this document refers to trunk commits if that is not clearly stated on the document?
>
> BTW, I'm not faulting Hans. Thank you Hans for helping me.
>
> Regards,
> Ruth
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz"
> ruth.hoffman@myofbiz.com
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> Read what? The main new features page refers to what is going on in the trunk and has no bearing on the release branches after their creation. The release branches don't receive new features, only bug fixes.
>>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> On 27/01/2010, at 7:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Scott:
>>>
>>> Read it and weep :-)
>>>
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features
>>>
>>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ashish:
>>>>> If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04?
>>>>>
>>>> It does? Since when?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What bug fix drove this change?
>>>>> [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.]
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>
>>>>> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Comments inline:
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ashish
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Scott:
>>>>>>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question.
>>>>>>> Next question: should it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes
>>>>>> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported
>>>>>> in trunk would make others life easy IMO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Ruth,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the
>>>>>>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ant download-selenium
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This returns the following error:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main
>>>>>>>>> Build".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version
>>>>>>>>> 899857?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com>.
Hi Scott:
Actually, no where on that page does it say "trunk". What it does say is
"...approximately to changes since Release 4.0..." which could
potentially lead new users - looking for more information about various
release contents - to assume that these changes apply to OFBiz releases.
So, I'm back to my original question concerning whether or not Selenium
support is in 9.04. I was told to read this document and everything it
pointed to. I did. And...I made some incorrect assumptions.
I made the original request on the User's mailing list. I'm a user and
not a committer. How am I suppose to know that this document refers to
trunk commits if that is not clearly stated on the document?
BTW, I'm not faulting Hans. Thank you Hans for helping me.
Regards,
Ruth
----------------------------------------------------
Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz"
ruth.hoffman@myofbiz.com
Scott Gray wrote:
> Read what? The main new features page refers to what is going on in the trunk and has no bearing on the release branches after their creation. The release branches don't receive new features, only bug fixes.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 27/01/2010, at 7:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Scott:
>>
>> Read it and weep :-)
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features
>>
>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>
>>> On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Ashish:
>>>> If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It does? Since when?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> What bug fix drove this change?
>>>> [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.]
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ruth
>>>>
>>>> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Comments inline:
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ashish
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Scott:
>>>>>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question.
>>>>>> Next question: should it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes
>>>>> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported
>>>>> in trunk would make others life easy IMO.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Ruth,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the
>>>>>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ant download-selenium
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This returns the following error:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main
>>>>>>>> Build".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version
>>>>>>>> 899857?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Read what? The main new features page refers to what is going on in the trunk and has no bearing on the release branches after their creation. The release branches don't receive new features, only bug fixes.
Regards
Scott
On 27/01/2010, at 7:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Scott:
>
> Read it and weep :-)
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Ashish:
>>> If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04?
>>>
>>
>> It does? Since when?
>>
>>
>>> What bug fix drove this change?
>>> [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.]
>>> Regards,
>>> Ruth
>>>
>>> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
>>>
>>>> Comments inline:
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ashish
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Scott:
>>>>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question.
>>>>> Next question: should it?
>>>>>
>>>> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes
>>>> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect
>>>>>>
>>>>> this?
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported
>>>> in trunk would make others life easy IMO.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ruth,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the
>>>>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ant download-selenium
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This returns the following error:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main
>>>>>>> Build".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version
>>>>>>> 899857?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com>.
Hi Scott:
Read it and weep :-)
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features
Scott Gray wrote:
> On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Ashish:
>> If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04?
>>
>
> It does? Since when?
>
>
>> What bug fix drove this change?
>> [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.]
>> Regards,
>> Ruth
>>
>> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
>>
>>> Comments inline:
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ashish
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Scott:
>>>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question.
>>>> Next question: should it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes
>>> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported
>>> in trunk would make others life easy IMO.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ruth
>>>>
>>>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ruth,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the
>>>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ant download-selenium
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This returns the following error:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main
>>>>>> Build".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version
>>>>>> 899857?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
On 27/01/2010, at 6:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Ashish:
> If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04?
It does? Since when?
> What bug fix drove this change?
> [IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.]
> Regards,
> Ruth
>
> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
>> Comments inline:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Ashish
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Scott:
>>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question.
>>> Next question: should it?
>>>
>>
>> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes
>> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix.
>>
>>
>>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect
>>>>
>>> this?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported
>> in trunk would make others life easy IMO.
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ruth
>>>
>>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ruth,
>>>>
>>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase
>>>> Regards
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> HotWax Media
>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the
>>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
>>>>>
>>>>> ant download-selenium
>>>>>
>>>>> This returns the following error:
>>>>>
>>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main
>>>>> Build".
>>>>>
>>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version
>>>>> 899857?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com>.
Hi Ashish:
If that is the case, then why is Java 1.6 now required for 9.04? What
bug fix drove this change?
[IMHO, a significant change in the release as some users such as myself
are not able to upgrade to 1.6 at this point.]
Regards,
Ruth
Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
> Comments inline:
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Ashish
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Scott:
>> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question.
>> Next question: should it?
>>
>
> I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes
> were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix.
>
>
>>> Or should the documentation be amended to reflect
>>>
>> this?
>>
>
> Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported
> in trunk would make others life easy IMO.
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Ruth
>>
>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ruth,
>>>
>>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase
>>> Regards
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> HotWax Media
>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the
>>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
>>>>
>>>> ant download-selenium
>>>>
>>>> This returns the following error:
>>>>
>>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main
>>>> Build".
>>>>
>>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857
>>>>
>>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version
>>>> 899857?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ruth
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Ashish Vijaywargiya <vi...@gmail.com>.
Comments inline:
Thanks!
--
Ashish
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com> wrote:
> Hi Scott:
> Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question.
> Next question: should it?
I don't think that it should be back ported to RB9.04 as those changes
were the feature enhancement instead of bug fix.
>>Or should the documentation be amended to reflect
> this?
Yes, updating the document with mention that this feature is supported
in trunk would make others life easy IMO.
> Regards,
> Ruth
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ruth,
>>
>> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> HotWax Media
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>
>>
>> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the
>>> necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
>>>
>>> ant download-selenium
>>>
>>> This returns the following error:
>>>
>>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main
>>> Build".
>>>
>>> for Release 9.04 version 899857
>>>
>>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version
>>> 899857?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ruth
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Ruth Hoffman <rh...@aesolves.com>.
Hi Scott:
Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question.
Next question: should it? Or should the documentation be amended to
reflect this?
Regards,
Ruth
Scott Gray wrote:
> Hi Ruth,
>
> I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
>
> On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>
>
>> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
>>
>> ant download-selenium
>>
>> This returns the following error:
>>
>> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main Build".
>>
>> for Release 9.04 version 899857
>>
>> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version 899857?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ruth
>>
>
>
Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Hi Ruth,
I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> According to the documentation, I should be able to download the necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:
>
> ant download-selenium
>
> This returns the following error:
>
> Target "download-selenium" does not exist in the project "OFBiz Main Build".
>
> for Release 9.04 version 899857
>
> Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version 899857?
>
> Regards,
> Ruth