You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by "jorisvandenbossche (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/02/24 16:31:35 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow] jorisvandenbossche commented on issue #34319: [R] v11.0.0.2 extremely slow with parquet files written in v9.0.0

jorisvandenbossche commented on issue #34319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/34319#issuecomment-1443965628

   I don't directly see a similar issue with pyarrow. Using the low-level reader (and a private method to be able to pass column indices directly instead of column names, to mimic what happens in R):
   
   ```
   In [1]: import pyarrow.parquet as pq
   
   In [2]: %timeit pq.ParquetFile("test_data.parquet").reader.read_all(column_indices=list(range(200)))
   146 ms ± 22 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
   ```
   
   That's with pyarrow 9.0, and I see basically the same for pyarrow 10.0.
   
   So maybe something changed with how the `col_select` keyword is being used?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org