[RESULT][VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.1

[Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>]

OK, thanks, everyone, finally, we pass this vote, I will promote the
artifacts soon !
+1 : Rick McGuire, Donald Woods, Joe Bohn

2010/6/2 Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>

> OK, thanks for clarifying it, Kevan
> I will wait to tomorrow, if no objection, I hope to pass this long time
> vote.
>
> 2010/6/2 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
>>
>> On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Ivan wrote:
>>
>> I checked the Tomcat's own NOTICE files, we do not distribute those
>> components in the customized Tomcat release.
>>
>> Quoted from NOTICE file :
>>
>> The Windows Installer is built with the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System
>> (NSIS), which is open source software. The original software and related
>> information is available at http://nsis.sourceforge.net.
>> Java compilation software for JSP pages is provided by Eclipse, which is
>> open source software. The original software and related information is
>> available at http://www.eclipse.org. For the bayeux implementation
>> The org.apache.cometd.bayeux API is derivative work originating at the
>> Dojo Foundation * Copyright 2007-2008 Guy Molinari * Copyright 2007-2008
>> Filip Hanik * Copyright 2007 Dojo Foundation * Copyright 2007 Mort Bay
>> Consulting Pty. Ltd.
>> The original XML Schemas for Java EE Deployment Descriptors: -
>> javaee_5.xsd - javaee_web_services_1_2.xsd -
>> javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd - javaee_6.xsd -
>> javaee_web_services_1_3.xsd - javaee_web_services_client_1_3.xsd -
>> web-app_3_0.xsd - web-common_3_0.xsd - web-fragment_3_0.xsd - jsp_2_2.xsd
>> may be obtained from http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/
>>
>> In the LICENSE file, I found other licenses except for ASL in the
>> following :
>> 1.  Eclipse Public License - v 1.0
>> 2. zlib/libpng license.
>> 3. bzip2 license.
>> 4. Common Public License version 1.0.
>> 5. COMMON DEVELOPMENT AND DISTRIBUTION LICENSE (CDDL) Version 1.0
>>
>> All those licenses are for Tomcat sub components.
>>
>> I am not quite familiar those license issues, but since we do not
>> distribute those components, we should not require to add them.
>> Comments ?
>>
>>
>> As long as the LICENSE/NOTICE information do not cover any of the
>> source/binaries that we are releasing, then that sounds correct.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>



-- 
Ivan