You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2004/03/24 01:28:39 UTC
Re: [r9077] HTTP status code for attempted (and unsupported)
multi-author commits
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 01:11, Daniel Rall wrote:
> r9077 is a bug fix which sets the transaction author (if previously unset) and
> blocks multi-author commit. You've nominated r9077 for backport to the 1.0.x
> branch, and it generally seems like a great candidate. One comment -- my
> reading of RFC2616 indicates that a 501 status code would be more appropriate
> than a 500 for attempts at unsupported operations. I'd like this change to be
> part of the r9077 backport nomination. Thoughts?
+1.
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: [r9077] HTTP status code for attempted (and unsupported) multi-author commits
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:28:39AM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 01:11, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > r9077 is a bug fix which sets the transaction author (if previously unset) and
> > blocks multi-author commit. You've nominated r9077 for backport to the 1.0.x
> > branch, and it generally seems like a great candidate. One comment -- my
> > reading of RFC2616 indicates that a 501 status code would be more appropriate
> > than a 500 for attempts at unsupported operations. I'd like this change to be
> > part of the r9077 backport nomination. Thoughts?
>
> +1.
+1 from me, too.
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org