You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by fachhoch <fa...@gmail.com> on 2010/11/01 19:35:01 UTC
wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
I am using wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8 , will this combination work
fine or can cause any issues ?
I cannot upgrade to wicket push to 1.4.12 because of bugs .
Please tell me if it is ok to use this combination ?
--
View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-4-12-and-wicket-push-1-4-8-tp3022594p3022594.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
Posted by fachhoch <fa...@gmail.com>.
ok i will try the new version and test it .
why I need push here is I display status in each of these panels.
mine is a workflow application as workflow changes for a PK I have to update
the current status which is shown in these panels.
--
View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-4-12-and-wicket-push-1-4-8-tp3022594p3027752.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
Posted by Rodolfo Hansen <kr...@gmail.com>.
IT does not work well for components INSIDE the datatable,
You are not using push behavior correctly, if the push behavior adds a
persistence communication channel between a component and the server,
the channel will break once the component is removed.
I still don't understand why you need push in these examples...
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 07:20 -0700, fachhoch wrote:
> Please suggest me if comet works with lazyloading components ?
>
> also I use AjaxDefaultDatatable each row in the datatable has a panel ,
> each panel which listens to its own channel all channels are unique, the
> datatbale also has ajaxpagination so when 2 page is selected the datatbale
> is repainted and new panels are created for each row
>
> this was my use case and I had problems with comet , so in simple words does
> comet supports components which are replaced by ajax ?
>
>
>
>
Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
Posted by fachhoch <fa...@gmail.com>.
Please suggest me if comet works with lazyloading components ?
also I use AjaxDefaultDatatable each row in the datatable has a panel ,
each panel which listens to its own channel all channels are unique, the
datatbale also has ajaxpagination so when 2 page is selected the datatbale
is repainted and new panels are created for each row
this was my use case and I had problems with comet , so in simple words does
comet supports components which are replaced by ajax ?
--
View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-4-12-and-wicket-push-1-4-8-tp3022594p3027089.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
Posted by Sebastian <no...@gmx.net>.
As part of wicketstuff 1.4.13 we have the new implementation released
now. give it a try and also check the examples since the API has changed.
Regards,
seb
On 01.11.2010 19:35, fachhoch wrote:
>
> I am using wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8 , will this combination work
> fine or can cause any issues ?
> I cannot upgrade to wicket push to 1.4.12 because of bugs .
> Please tell me if it is ok to use this combination ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
Posted by Rodolfo Hansen <kr...@gmail.com>.
Yes, this is safe.
Sebastian did some great work cleaning up the original API and classes.
The examples have also been extended to make the usage scenarios much
clearer.
We are working on moving all this work into wicketstuff right now, we
would love for you to test it later as it becomes available, but please
feel free to use the previous (1.4.8) release as it is still the most
stable.
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:35 -0700, fachhoch wrote:
> I am using wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8 , will this combination work
> fine or can cause any issues ?
> I cannot upgrade to wicket push to 1.4.12 because of bugs .
> Please tell me if it is ok to use this combination ?