You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Chris Chiappone <ch...@gmail.com> on 2007/05/09 17:30:21 UTC
Improving Autocompleter performance T 4.1.2
I am trying to figure out why my autocompleter performs so slowly.
I've tried multiple things to try to improve. I've tried using the
DefaultAutoComplete model, a StringAutoCompleteModel that just takes
in a List<String> and looks for a match where the List is created in
PageBeginRender and set as a abstract property, and even a
DBAutoCompleteModel that queries the db for matches.
Looking at FireBug the dojo response time is around 11000ms which is
way to long. What other things could I try to improve the performace?
Thanks,
--
~chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Improving Autocompleter performance T 4.1.2
Posted by janjonge <ja...@gmail.com>.
Please use detachable models!
Jan
mistapony wrote:
>
> I am trying to figure out why my autocompleter performs so slowly.
> I've tried multiple things to try to improve. I've tried using the
> DefaultAutoComplete model, a StringAutoCompleteModel that just takes
> in a List<String> and looks for a match where the List is created in
> PageBeginRender and set as a abstract property, and even a
> DBAutoCompleteModel that queries the db for matches.
>
> Looking at FireBug the dojo response time is around 11000ms which is
> way to long. What other things could I try to improve the performace?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> ~chris
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Improving-Autocompleter-performance-T-4.1.2-tf3716452.html#a10396701
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Improving Autocompleter performance T 4.1.2
Posted by Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr>.
+1
On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oh right - good point.
>
> I sent them an email about that just the other day and was asked to:
>
> Please send me the list of developers (names and surnames)
> which need licenses.
>
>
> So if anyone needs one let me know and I'll add you to the list. (I'm
> adding
> Howard in whether he likes it or not ;) )
>
> On 5/9/07, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> >
> > Any chance they could send us an 'apache-tapestry' license? or should i
> go
> > asking one on
> > my own?
> >
> > On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Try using http://yourkit.com/ . It leaves 0 doubt about the
> performance
> > > bottleneck in these things.
> > >
> > > On 5/9/07, Chris Chiappone <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to figure out why my autocompleter performs so slowly.
> > > > I've tried multiple things to try to improve. I've tried using the
> > > > DefaultAutoComplete model, a StringAutoCompleteModel that just takes
> > > > in a List<String> and looks for a match where the List is created in
> > > > PageBeginRender and set as a abstract property, and even a
> > > > DBAutoCompleteModel that queries the db for matches.
> > > >
> > > > Looking at FireBug the dojo response time is around 11000ms which is
> > > > way to long. What other things could I try to improve the
> performace?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ~chris
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
> > >
> > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > Open Source / JEE Consulting
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
>
--
Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
Tapestry / Tacos developer
Open Source / JEE Consulting
Re: Improving Autocompleter performance T 4.1.2
Posted by Andrea Chiumenti <ki...@gmail.com>.
This solution is a possible one and not easy at all.
The main problem is that dojo as every js variable is bound to the document
(page) so when you switch to anther page you loose it.
More dojo dynamically load small js code files, so if you have many differet
dojo require into your page you'll open many connections. This is good for
one or two but terrible when there are many of them.
Now the idea:
Since T4 has the possibility do have custom services, building a caching
dojo service that deploy dojo.js plus all page related dojo.require in a
single stram shold improve drammatically the rendering speed.
So for a given page, the first time it is accessed i will be provided only
the stream containing dojo.js. While dojo.require are called they are
intercepted by the service that will cache them in a queue.
The next time the same page is accessed, even by another user, the caching
system will provide instead of the single dojo.js, the whole called dojo
files.
But, as I said, this is not easy at all.
kiuma
On 5/9/07, Andrea Chiumenti <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 5/9/07, D&J Gredler <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh right - good point.
> > >
> > > I sent them an email about that just the other day and was asked to:
> > >
> > > Please send me the list of developers (names and surnames)
> > > which need licenses.
> > >
> > >
> > > So if anyone needs one let me know and I'll add you to the list. (I'm
> > > adding
> > > Howard in whether he likes it or not ;) )
> > >
> > > On 5/9/07, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Any chance they could send us an 'apache-tapestry' license? or
> > should i
> > > go
> > > > asking one on
> > > > my own?
> > > >
> > > > On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Try using http://yourkit.com/ . It leaves 0 doubt about the
> > > performance
> > > > > bottleneck in these things.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/9/07, Chris Chiappone < chiappone@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am trying to figure out why my autocompleter performs so
> > slowly.
> > > > > > I've tried multiple things to try to improve. I've tried using
> > the
> > > > > > DefaultAutoComplete model, a StringAutoCompleteModel that just
> > takes
> > > > > > in a List<String> and looks for a match where the List is
> > created in
> > > > > > PageBeginRender and set as a abstract property, and even a
> > > > > > DBAutoCompleteModel that queries the db for matches.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looking at FireBug the dojo response time is around 11000ms
> > which is
> > > > > > way to long. What other things could I try to improve the
> > > performace?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > ~chris
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > > Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
> > > > >
> > > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > > Open Source / JEE Consulting
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
> > >
> > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Improving Autocompleter performance T 4.1.2
Posted by Andrea Chiumenti <ki...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 5/9/07, D&J Gredler <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oh right - good point.
> >
> > I sent them an email about that just the other day and was asked to:
> >
> > Please send me the list of developers (names and surnames)
> > which need licenses.
> >
> >
> > So if anyone needs one let me know and I'll add you to the list. (I'm
> > adding
> > Howard in whether he likes it or not ;) )
> >
> > On 5/9/07, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> > >
> > > Any chance they could send us an 'apache-tapestry' license? or should
> i
> > go
> > > asking one on
> > > my own?
> > >
> > > On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Try using http://yourkit.com/ . It leaves 0 doubt about the
> > performance
> > > > bottleneck in these things.
> > > >
> > > > On 5/9/07, Chris Chiappone <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am trying to figure out why my autocompleter performs so slowly.
> > > > > I've tried multiple things to try to improve. I've tried using
> the
> > > > > DefaultAutoComplete model, a StringAutoCompleteModel that just
> takes
> > > > > in a List<String> and looks for a match where the List is created
> in
> > > > > PageBeginRender and set as a abstract property, and even a
> > > > > DBAutoCompleteModel that queries the db for matches.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking at FireBug the dojo response time is around 11000ms which
> is
> > > > > way to long. What other things could I try to improve the
> > performace?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ~chris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
> > > >
> > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > > Open Source / JEE Consulting
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Kuhnert
> > Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
> >
> > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
> >
>
Re: Improving Autocompleter performance T 4.1.2
Posted by D&J Gredler <dj...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oh right - good point.
>
> I sent them an email about that just the other day and was asked to:
>
> Please send me the list of developers (names and surnames)
> which need licenses.
>
>
> So if anyone needs one let me know and I'll add you to the list. (I'm
> adding
> Howard in whether he likes it or not ;) )
>
> On 5/9/07, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
> >
> > Any chance they could send us an 'apache-tapestry' license? or should i
> go
> > asking one on
> > my own?
> >
> > On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Try using http://yourkit.com/ . It leaves 0 doubt about the
> performance
> > > bottleneck in these things.
> > >
> > > On 5/9/07, Chris Chiappone <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to figure out why my autocompleter performs so slowly.
> > > > I've tried multiple things to try to improve. I've tried using the
> > > > DefaultAutoComplete model, a StringAutoCompleteModel that just takes
> > > > in a List<String> and looks for a match where the List is created in
> > > > PageBeginRender and set as a abstract property, and even a
> > > > DBAutoCompleteModel that queries the db for matches.
> > > >
> > > > Looking at FireBug the dojo response time is around 11000ms which is
> > > > way to long. What other things could I try to improve the
> performace?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ~chris
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
> > >
> > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> > Tapestry / Tacos developer
> > Open Source / JEE Consulting
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
>
Re: Improving Autocompleter performance T 4.1.2
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
Oh right - good point.
I sent them an email about that just the other day and was asked to:
Please send me the list of developers (names and surnames)
which need licenses.
So if anyone needs one let me know and I'll add you to the list. (I'm adding
Howard in whether he likes it or not ;) )
On 5/9/07, Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr> wrote:
>
> Any chance they could send us an 'apache-tapestry' license? or should i go
> asking one on
> my own?
>
> On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Try using http://yourkit.com/ . It leaves 0 doubt about the performance
> > bottleneck in these things.
> >
> > On 5/9/07, Chris Chiappone <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I am trying to figure out why my autocompleter performs so slowly.
> > > I've tried multiple things to try to improve. I've tried using the
> > > DefaultAutoComplete model, a StringAutoCompleteModel that just takes
> > > in a List<String> and looks for a match where the List is created in
> > > PageBeginRender and set as a abstract property, and even a
> > > DBAutoCompleteModel that queries the db for matches.
> > >
> > > Looking at FireBug the dojo response time is around 11000ms which is
> > > way to long. What other things could I try to improve the performace?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > --
> > > ~chris
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Kuhnert
> > Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
> >
> > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> Tapestry / Tacos developer
> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
Re: Improving Autocompleter performance T 4.1.2
Posted by Andreas Andreou <an...@di.uoa.gr>.
Any chance they could send us an 'apache-tapestry' license? or should i go
asking one on
my own?
On 5/9/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Try using http://yourkit.com/ . It leaves 0 doubt about the performance
> bottleneck in these things.
>
> On 5/9/07, Chris Chiappone <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to figure out why my autocompleter performs so slowly.
> > I've tried multiple things to try to improve. I've tried using the
> > DefaultAutoComplete model, a StringAutoCompleteModel that just takes
> > in a List<String> and looks for a match where the List is created in
> > PageBeginRender and set as a abstract property, and even a
> > DBAutoCompleteModel that queries the db for matches.
> >
> > Looking at FireBug the dojo response time is around 11000ms which is
> > way to long. What other things could I try to improve the performace?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > ~chris
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
>
--
Andreas Andreou - andyhot@apache.org - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
Tapestry / Tacos developer
Open Source / JEE Consulting
Re: Improving Autocompleter performance T 4.1.2
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
Try using http://yourkit.com/ . It leaves 0 doubt about the performance
bottleneck in these things.
On 5/9/07, Chris Chiappone <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am trying to figure out why my autocompleter performs so slowly.
> I've tried multiple things to try to improve. I've tried using the
> DefaultAutoComplete model, a StringAutoCompleteModel that just takes
> in a List<String> and looks for a match where the List is created in
> PageBeginRender and set as a abstract property, and even a
> DBAutoCompleteModel that queries the db for matches.
>
> Looking at FireBug the dojo response time is around 11000ms which is
> way to long. What other things could I try to improve the performace?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> ~chris
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com