You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2006/03/23 23:08:11 UTC

[jira] Commented: (CONTINUUM-511) Continuum should use Server VM

    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-511?page=comments#action_61814 ] 

Emmanuel Venisse commented on CONTINUUM-511:
--------------------------------------------

do you have seen a difference?

> Continuum should use Server VM
> ------------------------------
>
>          Key: CONTINUUM-511
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-511
>      Project: Continuum
>         Type: Improvement

>   Components: Core system
>     Versions: 1.0.2
>     Reporter: Matthew Beermann
>     Priority: Minor
>      Fix For: 1.1
>  Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> Continuum could (should?) use the Server VM rather than the default Client VM when running as a service. I'm not fully versed in all the differences between them, but from what I do know, it seems much more appropriate.
> This would involve adding another "wrapper.java.additional" parameter to bin/win32/wrapper.conf (-server).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira