You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@drill.apache.org by Parth Chandra <pc...@maprtech.com> on 2015/04/15 22:37:04 UTC
Fix Version versus Target Version in JIRAs
It seems to me that we have been using Fix Version when we probably mean
Target Version.
The JIRA create issue dialog has this:
Target Version: The versions where this patch is intended to be committed.
Use "Fix Version" to note where it actually has been committed.
Perhaps we should start using the correct field?
Re: Fix Version versus Target Version in JIRAs
Posted by Chris Westin <ch...@gmail.com>.
OK, if we're not going to use Target Version, then let's get rid of it.
Having two is confusing.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Parth Chandra <pc...@maprtech.com>
wrote:
> In that case we should remove the custom target version field. The create
> issue dialog indicates that we should use target version to indicate the
> version we want the issue fixed in. This just causes confusion.
> I checked some other Apache projects, they all have fix version but no
> target version.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I prefer one field. Otherwise, the dialogs that jira shows don't have
> the
> > field that we need showing frequently (since it is a custom field, the
> > dialogs would need to be updated but that isn't something we can do
> > ourselves. (This is why, after adding the target version field, we
> stopped
> > using it.)
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Steven Phillips <sphillips@maprtech.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think there should just be one field. While the work is in progress,
> it
> > > represents the target version, and if the work is complete, it
> represents
> > > the fix version. I don't really see the point in having a "target"
> > version
> > > once it is fixed.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Chris Westin <chriswestin42@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Right. I'd like to use Target Version for when we'd like to have it
> > fixed
> > > > by, and Fix Version for when it actually got fixed.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Parth Chandra <
> pchandra@maprtech.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It seems to me that we have been using Fix Version when we probably
> > > mean
> > > > > Target Version.
> > > > >
> > > > > The JIRA create issue dialog has this:
> > > > >
> > > > > Target Version: The versions where this patch is intended to be
> > > > committed.
> > > > > Use "Fix Version" to note where it actually has been committed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps we should start using the correct field?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steven Phillips
> > > Software Engineer
> > >
> > > mapr.com
> > >
> >
>
Re: Fix Version versus Target Version in JIRAs
Posted by Parth Chandra <pc...@maprtech.com>.
In that case we should remove the custom target version field. The create
issue dialog indicates that we should use target version to indicate the
version we want the issue fixed in. This just causes confusion.
I checked some other Apache projects, they all have fix version but no
target version.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> I prefer one field. Otherwise, the dialogs that jira shows don't have the
> field that we need showing frequently (since it is a custom field, the
> dialogs would need to be updated but that isn't something we can do
> ourselves. (This is why, after adding the target version field, we stopped
> using it.)
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Steven Phillips <sp...@maprtech.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think there should just be one field. While the work is in progress, it
> > represents the target version, and if the work is complete, it represents
> > the fix version. I don't really see the point in having a "target"
> version
> > once it is fixed.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Chris Westin <ch...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Right. I'd like to use Target Version for when we'd like to have it
> fixed
> > > by, and Fix Version for when it actually got fixed.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Parth Chandra <pc...@maprtech.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It seems to me that we have been using Fix Version when we probably
> > mean
> > > > Target Version.
> > > >
> > > > The JIRA create issue dialog has this:
> > > >
> > > > Target Version: The versions where this patch is intended to be
> > > committed.
> > > > Use "Fix Version" to note where it actually has been committed.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps we should start using the correct field?
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Steven Phillips
> > Software Engineer
> >
> > mapr.com
> >
>
Re: Fix Version versus Target Version in JIRAs
Posted by Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>.
I prefer one field. Otherwise, the dialogs that jira shows don't have the
field that we need showing frequently (since it is a custom field, the
dialogs would need to be updated but that isn't something we can do
ourselves. (This is why, after adding the target version field, we stopped
using it.)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Steven Phillips <sp...@maprtech.com>
wrote:
> I think there should just be one field. While the work is in progress, it
> represents the target version, and if the work is complete, it represents
> the fix version. I don't really see the point in having a "target" version
> once it is fixed.
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Chris Westin <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Right. I'd like to use Target Version for when we'd like to have it fixed
> > by, and Fix Version for when it actually got fixed.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Parth Chandra <pc...@maprtech.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It seems to me that we have been using Fix Version when we probably
> mean
> > > Target Version.
> > >
> > > The JIRA create issue dialog has this:
> > >
> > > Target Version: The versions where this patch is intended to be
> > committed.
> > > Use "Fix Version" to note where it actually has been committed.
> > >
> > > Perhaps we should start using the correct field?
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Steven Phillips
> Software Engineer
>
> mapr.com
>
Re: Fix Version versus Target Version in JIRAs
Posted by Steven Phillips <sp...@maprtech.com>.
I think there should just be one field. While the work is in progress, it
represents the target version, and if the work is complete, it represents
the fix version. I don't really see the point in having a "target" version
once it is fixed.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Chris Westin <ch...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Right. I'd like to use Target Version for when we'd like to have it fixed
> by, and Fix Version for when it actually got fixed.
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Parth Chandra <pc...@maprtech.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It seems to me that we have been using Fix Version when we probably mean
> > Target Version.
> >
> > The JIRA create issue dialog has this:
> >
> > Target Version: The versions where this patch is intended to be
> committed.
> > Use "Fix Version" to note where it actually has been committed.
> >
> > Perhaps we should start using the correct field?
> >
>
--
Steven Phillips
Software Engineer
mapr.com
Re: Fix Version versus Target Version in JIRAs
Posted by Chris Westin <ch...@gmail.com>.
Right. I'd like to use Target Version for when we'd like to have it fixed
by, and Fix Version for when it actually got fixed.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Parth Chandra <pc...@maprtech.com>
wrote:
> It seems to me that we have been using Fix Version when we probably mean
> Target Version.
>
> The JIRA create issue dialog has this:
>
> Target Version: The versions where this patch is intended to be committed.
> Use "Fix Version" to note where it actually has been committed.
>
> Perhaps we should start using the correct field?
>
Re: Fix Version versus Target Version in JIRAs
Posted by Jason Altekruse <al...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Parth Chandra <pc...@maprtech.com>
wrote:
> It seems to me that we have been using Fix Version when we probably mean
> Target Version.
>
> The JIRA create issue dialog has this:
>
> Target Version: The versions where this patch is intended to be committed.
> Use "Fix Version" to note where it actually has been committed.
>
> Perhaps we should start using the correct field?
>
Re: Fix Version versus Target Version in JIRAs
Posted by Chris Westin <cw...@yahoo.com>.
Right. I'd like to use Target Version for when we'd like to have it fixed
by, and Fix Version for when it actually got fixed.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Parth Chandra <pc...@maprtech.com>
wrote:
> It seems to me that we have been using Fix Version when we probably mean
> Target Version.
>
> The JIRA create issue dialog has this:
>
> Target Version: The versions where this patch is intended to be committed.
> Use "Fix Version" to note where it actually has been committed.
>
> Perhaps we should start using the correct field?
>