You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> on 2016/11/06 20:58:26 UTC
[VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Hi!
after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
and at the IPMC level:
http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
Resolution:
Establish the Apache Geode Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
public, related to a data management platform that provides
real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
Foundation; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
widely distributed cloud architectures.
RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
for management of the projects within the scope of
responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Geode Project:
* Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
* Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
* Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
* Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
* Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
* Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
* Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
* Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
* Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
* Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
* Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
* Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
* Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
* Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
* Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
* Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
* John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
* Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
* Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
* Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
* Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
* Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
* Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
* Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
* Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
* Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
* Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
* Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
* William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
* Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
encourage open development and increased participation in the
Apache Geode Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
Project are hereafter discharged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by William Markito Oliveira <wi...@gmail.com>.
+1
~/William
> On Nov 6, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Niall
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
>> and at the IPMC level:
>> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
>> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>>
>> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
>> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
>> Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
>>
>> Resolution:
>>
>> Establish the Apache Geode Project
>>
>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
>> public, related to a data management platform that provides
>> real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
>> throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
>>
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
>> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>> Foundation; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>> related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
>> consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
>> widely distributed cloud architectures.
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>> of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
>> for management of the projects within the scope of
>> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>> Apache Geode Project:
>>
>> * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
>> * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
>> * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
>> * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
>> * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
>> * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
>> * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
>> * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
>> * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
>> * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
>> * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
>> * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
>> * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
>> * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
>> * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
>> * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
>> * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
>> * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
>> * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>> * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
>> * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
>> * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
>> * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
>> * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
>> * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
>> * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
>> * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
>> * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
>> * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
>> * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
>>
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
>> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
>> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
>> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
>> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
>> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
>> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>> encourage open development and increased participation in the
>> Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
>> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>> Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>> Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
>> Project are hereafter discharged.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Niall
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
>
> Resolution:
>
> Establish the Apache Geode Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a data management platform that provides
> real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Geode Project:
>
> * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 11/06/2016 09:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
>
> Resolution:
>
> Establish the Apache Geode Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a data management platform that provides
> real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Geode Project:
>
> * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>.
+1
On 2016-11-06 12:58 (-0800), Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
>
> Resolution:
>
> Establish the Apache Geode Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a data management platform that provides
> real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Geode Project:
>
> * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>.
+1
On Sunday, November 6, 2016, Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Anthony
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > and at the IPMC level:
> > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
> >
> > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> >
> > Resolution:
> >
> > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> >
> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > public, related to a data management platform that provides
> > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > Foundation; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> > consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > Apache Geode Project:
> >
> > * Anilkumar Gingade <agingade@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Anthony Baker <abaker@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Ashvin Agrawal <ashvin@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Avinash Dongre <adongre@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Bruce Schuchardt <bschuchardt@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Dan Smith <upthewaterspout@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Darrel Schneider <dschneider@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Dave Barnes <dbarnes@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Eric Shu <eshu11@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Greg Chase <gregchase@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Hitesh Khamesra <hiteshkhamesra@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Jason Huynh <jasonhuynh@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Jens Deppe <jensdeppe@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Jianxia Chen <jchen21@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Jinmei Liao <jinmeiliao@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * John Blum <jxblum@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Karen Miller <kmiller@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Kirk Lund <klund@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Mark Bretl <mbretl@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Nabarun Nag <nnag@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Niall Pemberton <niallp@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Nitin Lamba <nlamba@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Sai Boorlagadda <sai_boorlagadda@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawaskar@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Udo Kohlmeyer <udo@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * William Markito <markito@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > * Xiaojian Zhou <zhouxj@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > Project are hereafter discharged.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>.
+1
Anthony
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
>
> Resolution:
>
> Establish the Apache Geode Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a data management platform that provides
> real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Geode Project:
>
> * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
> On Sunday, 6 November 2016, 21:59, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
>> and at the IPMC level:
>> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
>> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>>
>> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
>> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Roman.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 6, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
>
> Resolution:
>
> Establish the Apache Geode Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a data management platform that provides
> real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Geode Project:
>
> * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Luke Han <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM +0800, "Christian Tzolov" <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thks
>> Amol
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote:
>>
>>> +1!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton <
>> niall.pemberton@gmail.com
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of
>> all
>>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
>> majority
>>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
>>> spend
>>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
>>> worked
>>>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the
>> issues
>>>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>>>>
>>>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
>>>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going
>>> to
>>>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
>>>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
>>>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the
>> right
>>>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved
>> with
>>>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
>>> right
>>>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except
>>> to
>>>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
>>> them
>>>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves
>> and
>>>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
>>>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>>>>
>>>> Niall
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/07/2016 07:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3010) wrote:
>>>>>> +1 (binding). Great work!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>>> Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
>>>>>> Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office
>>> (8212)
>>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>>> Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-502
>>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
>>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>>> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/7/16, 10:16 AM, "gchase@gmail.com on behalf of Greg Chase" <
>>>>> gchase@gmail.com on behalf of greg@gregchase.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <
>> mbretl@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Mark
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <
>>>>> adongre@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <
>>>>> wikier@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> good luck, guys!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <
>>>>>>> johndament@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <
>>>>> roman@shaposhnik.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> after a very positive discussion in the Geode
>>> community
>>>>>>>>>>>> and at the IPMC level:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a
>>> formal
>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to
>>> graduate
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level
>> project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the
>> Incubator
>>>>> because...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for
>> the
>>>>> support,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolution:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Establish the Apache Geode Project
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in
>> the
>>>>> best
>>>>>>>>>>>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project
>>> Management
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> open-source software, for distribution at no charge
>>> to
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> public, related to a data management platform that
>>>>> provides
>>>>>>>>>>>> real-time, consistent access to data-intensive
>>>>> applications
>>>>>>>>>>>> throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project
>>>> Management
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode
>>>>> Project",
>>>>>>>>>>>> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation; and be it further
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and
>> hereby
>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of
>>>> software
>>>>>>>>>>>> related to a data management platform that provides
>>>>> real-time,
>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent access to data-intensive applications
>>>>> throughout
>>>>>>>>>>>> widely distributed cloud architectures.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President,
>> Apache
>>>>> Geode" be
>>>>>>>>>>>> and hereby is created, the person holding such
>> office
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as
>>> the
>>>>> chair
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary
>>>>> responsibility
>>>>>>>>>>>> for management of the projects within the scope of
>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be
>> it
>>>>> further
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below
>>> be
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial
>> members
>>> of
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Geode Project:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Anilkumar Gingade
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Anthony Baker
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Ashvin Agrawal
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Avinash Dongre
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Bruce Schuchardt
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Dan Smith
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Darrel Schneider
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Dave Barnes
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Eric Shu
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Greg Chase
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Hitesh Khamesra
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jason Huynh
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jens Deppe
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jianxia Chen
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jinmei Liao
>>>>>>>>>>>> * John Blum
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Karen Miller
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Konstantin Boudnik
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Kirk Lund
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Mark Bretl
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Nabarun Nag
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Niall Pemberton
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Nitin Lamba
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Roman Shaposhnik
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Sai Boorlagadda
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Swapnil Bawaskar
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Udo Kohlmeyer
>>>>>>>>>>>> * William Markito
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Xiaojian Zhou
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark
>>> Bretl
>>>>>>>>>>>> be appointed to the office of Vice President,
>> Apache
>>>>> Geode, to
>>>>>>>>>>>> serve in accordance with and subject to the
>> direction
>>>> of
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation
>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>> death, resignation, retirement, removal or
>>>>> disqualification,
>>>>>>>>>>>> or until a successor is appointed; and be it
>> further
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and
>>>>> hereby is
>>>>>>>>>>>> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws
>> intended
>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> encourage open development and increased
>>> participation
>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and
>> hereby
>>>>>>>>>>>> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of
>>> the
>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>> Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to
>> the
>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>> Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache
>>>>> Incubator
>>>>>>>>>>>> Project are hereafter discharged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.
>>>>> apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>> general-help@incubator.apache.
>>>>>>> org
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Sergio Fernández
>>>>>>>>>> Partner Technology Manager
>>>>>>>>>> Redlink GmbH
>>>>>>>>>> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
>>>>>>>>>> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>>>>>>>>>> w: http://redlink.co
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ---------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Luke Han <lu...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM +0800, "Christian Tzolov" <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> +1
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote:
>
> > +1!
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton <
> niall.pemberton@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> > > >
> > > > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> > > > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of
> all
> > > > commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
> majority
> > > > of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
> > > >
> > > > Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
> > spend
> > > > resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
> > worked
> > > hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the
> issues
> > > raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
> > >
> > > In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> > > graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going
> > to
> > > repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
> > > served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
> > > demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the
> right
> > > direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved
> with
> > > and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
> > right
> > > direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except
> > to
> > > change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
> > them
> > > being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves
> and
> > > theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
> > > think we should vote for them to graduate.
> > >
> > > Niall
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > With regards,
> > > > Daniel.
> > > >
> > > > On 11/07/2016 07:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3010) wrote:
> > > > > +1 (binding). Great work!
> > > > >
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > > > > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
> > > > > Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office
> > (8212)
> > > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > > > > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-502
> > > > > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> > > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> > > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> > > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > > > > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/7/16, 10:16 AM, "gchase@gmail.com on behalf of Greg Chase" <
> > > > gchase@gmail.com on behalf of greg@gregchase.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <
> mbretl@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --Mark
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <
> > > > adongre@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <
> > > > wikier@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > good luck, guys!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <
> > > > roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode
> > community
> > > > > > > > > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > > > > > > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a
> > formal
> > > > vote.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to
> > graduate
> > > > > > > > > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level
> project.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the
> Incubator
> > > > because...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for
> the
> > > > support,
> > > > > > > > > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Resolution:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in
> the
> > > > best
> > > > > > > > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > > > > > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project
> > Management
> > > > > > > > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
> > of
> > > > > > > > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > public, related to a data management platform that
> > > > provides
> > > > > > > > > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive
> > > > applications
> > > > > > > > > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project
> > > Management
> > > > > > > > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode
> > > > Project",
> > > > > > > > > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and
> hereby
> > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of
> > > software
> > > > > > > > > > > related to a data management platform that provides
> > > > real-time,
> > > > > > > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > > > throughout
> > > > > > > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President,
> Apache
> > > > Geode" be
> > > > > > > > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such
> office
> > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as
> > the
> > > > chair
> > > > > > > > > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary
> > > > responsibility
> > > > > > > > > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > > > > > > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be
> it
> > > > further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below
> > be
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial
> members
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > * Anilkumar Gingade
> > > > > > > > > > > * Anthony Baker
> > > > > > > > > > > * Ashvin Agrawal
> > > > > > > > > > > * Avinash Dongre
> > > > > > > > > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Bruce Schuchardt
> > > > > > > > > > > * Dan Smith
> > > > > > > > > > > * Darrel Schneider
> > > > > > > > > > > * Dave Barnes
> > > > > > > > > > > * Eric Shu
> > > > > > > > > > > * Greg Chase
> > > > > > > > > > > * Hitesh Khamesra
> > > > > > > > > > > * Jason Huynh
> > > > > > > > > > > * Jens Deppe
> > > > > > > > > > > * Jianxia Chen
> > > > > > > > > > > * Jinmei Liao
> > > > > > > > > > > * John Blum
> > > > > > > > > > > * Karen Miller
> > > > > > > > > > > * Konstantin Boudnik
> > > > > > > > > > > * Kirk Lund
> > > > > > > > > > > * Mark Bretl
> > > > > > > > > > > * Nabarun Nag
> > > > > > > > > > > * Niall Pemberton
> > > > > > > > > > > * Nitin Lamba
> > > > > > > > > > > * Roman Shaposhnik
> > > > > > > > > > > * Sai Boorlagadda
> > > > > > > > > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar
> > > > > > > > > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer
> > > > > > > > > > > * William Markito
> > > > > > > > > > > * Xiaojian Zhou
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark
> > Bretl
> > > > > > > > > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President,
> Apache
> > > > Geode, to
> > > > > > > > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the
> direction
> > > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation
> > > until
> > > > > > > > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or
> > > > disqualification,
> > > > > > > > > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it
> further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and
> > > > hereby is
> > > > > > > > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws
> intended
> > to
> > > > > > > > > > > encourage open development and increased
> > participation
> > > > in the
> > > > > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and
> hereby
> > > > > > > > > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of
> > the
> > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to
> the
> > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache
> > > > Incubator
> > > > > > > > > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > ---------
> > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > general-unsubscribe@incubator.
> > > > apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > general-help@incubator.apache.
> > > > > > org
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Sergio Fernández
> > > > > > > > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > > > > > > > Redlink GmbH
> > > > > > > > > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > > > > > > > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > > > > > > > w: http://redlink.co
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Christian Tzolov <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre <am...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1!
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton <
> niall.pemberton@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> > > >
> > > > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> > > > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of
> all
> > > > commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
> majority
> > > > of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
> > > >
> > > > Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
> > spend
> > > > resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
> > worked
> > > hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the
> issues
> > > raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
> > >
> > > In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> > > graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going
> > to
> > > repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
> > > served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
> > > demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the
> right
> > > direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved
> with
> > > and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
> > right
> > > direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except
> > to
> > > change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
> > them
> > > being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves
> and
> > > theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
> > > think we should vote for them to graduate.
> > >
> > > Niall
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > With regards,
> > > > Daniel.
> > > >
> > > > On 11/07/2016 07:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3010) wrote:
> > > > > +1 (binding). Great work!
> > > > >
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > > > > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
> > > > > Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office
> > (8212)
> > > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > > > > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-502
> > > > > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> > > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> > > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> > > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > > > > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/7/16, 10:16 AM, "gchase@gmail.com on behalf of Greg Chase" <
> > > > gchase@gmail.com on behalf of greg@gregchase.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag <nn...@pivotal.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <
> mbretl@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --Mark
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <
> > > > adongre@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <
> > > > wikier@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > good luck, guys!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <
> > > > roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode
> > community
> > > > > > > > > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > > > > > > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a
> > formal
> > > > vote.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to
> > graduate
> > > > > > > > > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level
> project.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the
> Incubator
> > > > because...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for
> the
> > > > support,
> > > > > > > > > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Resolution:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in
> the
> > > > best
> > > > > > > > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > > > > > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project
> > Management
> > > > > > > > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
> > of
> > > > > > > > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > public, related to a data management platform that
> > > > provides
> > > > > > > > > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive
> > > > applications
> > > > > > > > > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project
> > > Management
> > > > > > > > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode
> > > > Project",
> > > > > > > > > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and
> hereby
> > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of
> > > software
> > > > > > > > > > > related to a data management platform that provides
> > > > real-time,
> > > > > > > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > > > throughout
> > > > > > > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President,
> Apache
> > > > Geode" be
> > > > > > > > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such
> office
> > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as
> > the
> > > > chair
> > > > > > > > > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary
> > > > responsibility
> > > > > > > > > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > > > > > > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be
> it
> > > > further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below
> > be
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial
> members
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark
> > Bretl
> > > > > > > > > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President,
> Apache
> > > > Geode, to
> > > > > > > > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the
> direction
> > > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation
> > > until
> > > > > > > > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or
> > > > disqualification,
> > > > > > > > > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it
> further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and
> > > > hereby is
> > > > > > > > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws
> intended
> > to
> > > > > > > > > > > encourage open development and increased
> > participation
> > > > in the
> > > > > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and
> hereby
> > > > > > > > > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of
> > the
> > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to
> the
> > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache
> > > > Incubator
> > > > > > > > > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > ---------
> > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > general-unsubscribe@incubator.
> > > > apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > general-help@incubator.apache.
> > > > > > org
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Sergio Fernández
> > > > > > > > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > > > > > > > Redlink GmbH
> > > > > > > > > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > > > > > > > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > > > > > > > w: http://redlink.co
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Amol Kekre <am...@datatorrent.com>.
+1
Thks
Amol
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1!
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> > >
> > > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> > > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
> > > commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
> > > of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
> > >
> > > Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
> spend
> > > resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
> > >
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
> worked
> > hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
> > raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
> >
> > In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> > graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going
> to
> > repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
> > served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
> > demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
> > direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
> > and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
> right
> > direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except
> to
> > change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
> them
> > being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
> > theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
> > think we should vote for them to graduate.
> >
> > Niall
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > With regards,
> > > Daniel.
> > >
> > > On 11/07/2016 07:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3010) wrote:
> > > > +1 (binding). Great work!
> > > >
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > > > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
> > > > Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office
> (8212)
> > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > > > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-502
> > > > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > > > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/7/16, 10:16 AM, "gchase@gmail.com on behalf of Greg Chase" <
> > > gchase@gmail.com on behalf of greg@gregchase.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1!
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag <nn...@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --Mark
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <
> > > adongre@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <
> > > wikier@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > good luck, guys!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <
> > > roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode
> community
> > > > > > > > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > > > > > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a
> formal
> > > vote.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to
> graduate
> > > > > > > > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator
> > > because...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the
> > > support,
> > > > > > > > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Resolution:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the
> > > best
> > > > > > > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > > > > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project
> Management
> > > > > > > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
> of
> > > > > > > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge
> to
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > public, related to a data management platform that
> > > provides
> > > > > > > > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive
> > > applications
> > > > > > > > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project
> > Management
> > > > > > > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode
> > > Project",
> > > > > > > > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of
> the
> > > > > > > > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > is
> > > > > > > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of
> > software
> > > > > > > > > > related to a data management platform that provides
> > > real-time,
> > > > > > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > > throughout
> > > > > > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache
> > > Geode" be
> > > > > > > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office
> > to
> > > > > > > > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as
> the
> > > chair
> > > > > > > > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary
> > > responsibility
> > > > > > > > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > > > > > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it
> > > further
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below
> be
> > > and
> > > > > > > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark
> Bretl
> > > > > > > > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache
> > > Geode, to
> > > > > > > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction
> > of
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation
> > until
> > > > > > > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or
> > > disqualification,
> > > > > > > > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and
> > > hereby is
> > > > > > > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended
> to
> > > > > > > > > > encourage open development and increased
> participation
> > > in the
> > > > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > > > > > > > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of
> the
> > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the
> > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache
> > > Incubator
> > > > > > > > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > ---------
> > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.
> > > apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > general-help@incubator.apache.
> > > > > org
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Sergio Fernández
> > > > > > > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > > > > > > Redlink GmbH
> > > > > > > > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > > > > > > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > > > > > > w: http://redlink.co
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>.
+1!
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> >
> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
> > commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
> > of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
> >
> > Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
> > resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
> >
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've worked
> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>
> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going to
> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the right
> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except to
> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for them
> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>
> Niall
>
>
>
> >
> > With regards,
> > Daniel.
> >
> > On 11/07/2016 07:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3010) wrote:
> > > +1 (binding). Great work!
> > >
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
> > > Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
> > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-502
> > > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/7/16, 10:16 AM, "gchase@gmail.com on behalf of Greg Chase" <
> > gchase@gmail.com on behalf of greg@gregchase.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag <nn...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > --Mark
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <
> > adongre@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <
> > wikier@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > good luck, guys!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <
> > roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > > > > > > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > > > > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > > > > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal
> > vote.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > > > > > > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator
> > because...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the
> > support,
> > > > > > > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Resolution:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the
> > best
> > > > > > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > > > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > > > > > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > > > > > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
> > the
> > > > > > > > > public, related to a data management platform that
> > provides
> > > > > > > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive
> > applications
> > > > > > > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project
> Management
> > > > > > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode
> > Project",
> > > > > > > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > > > > > > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> is
> > > > > > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of
> software
> > > > > > > > > related to a data management platform that provides
> > real-time,
> > > > > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > throughout
> > > > > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache
> > Geode" be
> > > > > > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office
> to
> > > > > > > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the
> > chair
> > > > > > > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary
> > responsibility
> > > > > > > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > > > > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it
> > further
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be
> > and
> > > > > > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of
> > the
> > > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > > > > > > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache
> > Geode, to
> > > > > > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction
> of
> > the
> > > > > > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation
> until
> > > > > > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or
> > disqualification,
> > > > > > > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and
> > hereby is
> > > > > > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > > > > > > > > encourage open development and increased participation
> > in the
> > > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > > > > > > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the
> > Apache
> > > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the
> > Apache
> > > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache
> > Incubator
> > > > > > > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > ------------------------------
> > > > > > ---------
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.
> > apache.org
> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > general-help@incubator.apache.
> > > > org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Sergio Fernández
> > > > > > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > > > > > Redlink GmbH
> > > > > > > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > > > > > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > > > > > w: http://redlink.co
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> >> >
> >> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> >> > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
> >> > commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
> majority
> >> > of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
> >> >
> >> > Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
> spend
> >> > resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
> >> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
> worked
> > hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
> > raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
> >
> > In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> > graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going
> to
> > repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
> > served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
> > demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
> > direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
> > and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
> right
> > direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except
> to
> > change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
> them
> > being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
> > theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
> > think we should vote for them to graduate.
>
> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
> historically cause problems over time.
>
I only see a discussion about one specific project and I also see a board
member in that discussion saying that having a company over represented is
not an issue and the number of committees from a single company is not a
concern.
>
> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated? Surely we serve the
> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
>
> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
> building the community first.
>
I think you have to judge this project by its actions.
One example was that the documentation for Geode was hosted on a company
website - we raised this as a concern and they donated the whole Geode
technical docs to the ASF.
Really though I believe its about how they run the project. I think they
have created an open and welcoming community that will should attract more
contributors and reduce the dominance of one company. I also don't believe
theres anything left for them to learn here. At some point we have to trust
them to govern themselves and holding them here until they meet a specific
percentage diversity doesn't serve any purpose.
Niall
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Cos,
Did you mean this section?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
John
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:41 PM Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity
> requirement"
> in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and there, but so far it
> isn't an official IPMC requirement.
>
> And I'd hate to make a "diversity scape-goat" out of the project that has
> created a very welcome environment!
>
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:14PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern
> with
> > >>> > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of
> all
> > >>> > commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
> majority
> > >>> > of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
> spend
> > >>> > resources on this project, that the project would still be as
> viable?
> > >>> >
> > >> Hi Daniel,
> > >>
> > >> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
> worked
> > >> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the
> issues
> > >> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
> > >>
> > >> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> > >> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not
> going to
> > >> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better
> with
> > >> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have
> they
> > >> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the
> right
> > >> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved
> with
> > >> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
> right
> > >> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and
> except to
> > >> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
> them
> > >> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves
> and
> > >> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why
> I
> > >> think we should vote for them to graduate.
> > >
> > > Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
> > > board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects
> that
> > > are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
> > > historically cause problems over time.
> >
> > I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
> >
> > > Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
> >
> > I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in
> the
> > Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
> > new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
> >
> > > Surely we serve the
> > > Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
> > > (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP
> status?
> >
> > I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
> > (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
> > "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
> > votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
> > Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
> >
> > I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity
> requirement
> > simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
> >
> > > I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
> > > should the company opt out of working on the project, and more
> concerned
> > > with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting
> to
> > > see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
> > > building the community first.
> >
> > Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good
> number
> > of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with
> this
> > community.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
And here as well, with the precise specification of at a minimum 3
independent committers:
> The project is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there are at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single company or entity that is vital to the success of the project)
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Graduation+Requirements
Martijn
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 11:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>> Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity requirement"
>> in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and there, but so far it
>> isn't an official IPMC requirement.
>
> It's very prominently displayed in our graduation guideline.
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
>
>>
>> And I'd hate to make a "diversity scape-goat" out of the project that has
>> created a very welcome environment!
>>
>> Cos
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:14PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>>>>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
>>>>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
>>>>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
>>>>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've worked
>>>>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
>>>>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>>>>>
>>>>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
>>>>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going to
>>>>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
>>>>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
>>>>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
>>>>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
>>>>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the right
>>>>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except to
>>>>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for them
>>>>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
>>>>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
>>>>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>>>>
>>>> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
>>>> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
>>>> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
>>>> historically cause problems over time.
>>>
>>> I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
>>>
>>>> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
>>>
>>> I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in the
>>> Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
>>> new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
>>>
>>>> Surely we serve the
>>>> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
>>>> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
>>>
>>> I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
>>> (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
>>> "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
>>> votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
>>> Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
>>>
>>> I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity requirement
>>> simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
>>>
>>>> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
>>>> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
>>>> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
>>>> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
>>>> building the community first.
>>>
>>> Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good number
>>> of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with this
>>> community.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Roman.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 11/08/2016 11:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity requirement"
> in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and there, but so far it
> isn't an official IPMC requirement.
It's very prominently displayed in our graduation guideline.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
>
> And I'd hate to make a "diversity scape-goat" out of the project that has
> created a very welcome environment!
>
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:14PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>>>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
>>>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
>>>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
>>>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>>>>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've worked
>>>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
>>>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>>>>
>>>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
>>>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going to
>>>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
>>>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
>>>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
>>>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
>>>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the right
>>>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except to
>>>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for them
>>>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
>>>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
>>>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>>>
>>> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
>>> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
>>> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
>>> historically cause problems over time.
>>
>> I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
>>
>>> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
>>
>> I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in the
>> Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
>> new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
>>
>>> Surely we serve the
>>> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
>>> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
>>
>> I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
>> (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
>> "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
>> votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
>> Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
>>
>> I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity requirement
>> simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
>>
>>> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
>>> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
>>> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
>>> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
>>> building the community first.
>>
>> Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good number
>> of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with this
>> community.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity requirement"
in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and there, but so far it
isn't an official IPMC requirement.
And I'd hate to make a "diversity scape-goat" out of the project that has
created a very welcome environment!
Cos
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:14PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> >>> >
> >>> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> >>> > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
> >>> > commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
> >>> > of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
> >>> >
> >>> > Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
> >>> > resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
> >>> >
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've worked
> >> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
> >> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
> >>
> >> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> >> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going to
> >> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
> >> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
> >> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
> >> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
> >> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the right
> >> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except to
> >> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for them
> >> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
> >> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
> >> think we should vote for them to graduate.
> >
> > Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
> > board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
> > are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
> > historically cause problems over time.
>
> I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
>
> > Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
>
> I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in the
> Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
> new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
>
> > Surely we serve the
> > Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
> > (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
>
> I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
> (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
> "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
> votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
> Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
>
> I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity requirement
> simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
>
> > I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
> > should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
> > with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
> > see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
> > building the community first.
>
> Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good number
> of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with this
> community.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 11/09/2016 12:58 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>>>>>>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of
>>>> all
>>>>>>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
>>>> majority
>>>>>>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
>>>> spend
>>>>>>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
>>>> worked
>>>>>>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the
>>>> issues
>>>>>>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
>>>>>>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not
>>>> going to
>>>>>>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
>>>>>>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
>>>>>>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the
>>>> right
>>>>>>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved
>>>> with
>>>>>>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
>>>> right
>>>>>>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and
>>>> except to
>>>>>>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
>>>> them
>>>>>>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves
>>>> and
>>>>>>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
>>>>>>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
>>>>>> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
>>>>>> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
>>>>>> historically cause problems over time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in
>>>> the
>>>>> Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
>>>>> new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
>>>>
>>>> If it turns the project into a more diverse/dispersed community, I'd say
>>>> that's added value. We can argue all night whether that's up to the
>>>> IPMC, the project or the board to figure out, I'm not sure we'll agree
>>>> there :)
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Surely we serve the
>>>>>> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
>>>>>> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
>>>>>
>>>>> I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
>>>>> (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
>>>>> "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
>>>>> votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
>>>>> Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity
>>>> requirement
>>>>> simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
>>>>
>>>> Except it's not pointless for the foundation, we've seen that. we're
>>>> seeing that right now with several projects that either die completely
>>>> or take a very wrong turn because someone higher up the food chain
>>>> thinks otherwise about the project(s), and that also hurts the
>>>> foundation - let's not pretend that never happens. I can't say whether
>>>> this would be true for Geode (how would I know?), but a 96+% chunk of
>>>> all contributions coming from people affiliated with a single company is
>>>> worrisome to me.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
>>>>>> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
>>>>>> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
>>>>>> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
>>>>>> building the community first.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good
>>>> number
>>>>> of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with
>>>> this
>>>>> community.
>>>>
>>>> I'd say Rich should vote what he feels is right, not what "a good number
>>>> of us" think is right. That's not how consensus works.
>>>>
>>>> You'll notice that I haven't just said "-1, I don't like it". But I also
>>>> haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why this isn't a problem,
>>>> save a "we're sure it's not a problem" reply.
>>>>
>>>> If I were to look purely at contributions to the codebase, there is no
>>>> indication that this issue is at all being worked on, on the contrary,
>>>> if you look at contributions over time, the percentage that is purely
>>>> pivotal keeps going up and up, and now sits at >96% in the past 6 months.
>>>>
>>>> Voting in new committers is one thing, but if it doesn't lead to some
>>>> sort of dispersion of who has a deciding role in the project, then I
>>>> don't believe the current strategy is working.
>>>>
>>>> Furthermore, there is little to no recognition that this is even a
>>>> potential issue. I'd love to see people at least *acknowledging* that
>>>> this is something they have to work on, that'll give us something
>>>> tangible to relate to when deciding on a vote.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps you could re-read my first post, because I believe did acknowledge
>>> it.
>>
>> I didn't read it as such, but this does help towards that :) Thanks.
>
> Btw, this point I wholeheartedly agree with: if Geode gets to graduate, it will
> be joining a number of projects that need to be ever vigilant about undue
> corporate influence.
>
> From that standpoint, the community had a number of experiences around
> brand management, etc. that I believe served as a set of useful lessons in
> explaining how to go about this goal in an effective manner. The role of the
> board, of course, is central to making sure this goal is always a priority, but
> I also believe that this community has learned (and taken to heart) the fact
> that IPMC (regardless of a status of the project) and ComDev can be great
> resources.
>
> But once again, thanks for stressing this Daniel -- this is one of those things
> that can't be stressed enough.
As an FWIW, I would have spoken up sooner in the discuss thread, but eh,
work... so sorry about being late to the show. I don't mean to throw any
sticks in the general voting, I just want assurances that these are
issues projects are aware of and are, at the very least, attempting to
handle.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io>.
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:06 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
>>
>> So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there?
>>
>
> I know when I pointed this out to the PPMC a few weeks ago, the pivotal
> site went offline. Was it restored since then?
>
Nope, http://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/about_geode.html <http://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/about_geode.html> is the only site that hosts Geode documentation. The former site (http://geode.docs.pivotal.io <http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/>) no longer works.
The site that Justin found (https://github.com/project-geode/docs <https://github.com/project-geode/docs>) was used to host the documentation sources prior to contributing them to the Geode project. I agree that it should be taken down. In the meantime I’ll try and get the README updated to point to the current documentation sources in the Geode repo.
Thanks,
Anthony
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode.
>
> Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right?
>
> > the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
>
> So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there?
>
I know when I pointed this out to the PPMC a few weeks ago, the pivotal
site went offline. Was it restored since then?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode.
>
> Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right?
>
This is about ASF trademarks. Just because a company creates a product
based on an ASF project doesn't mean they have to mention it at all.
However IF they do mention the project, then they have to comply with the
trademark policy.
>
> > the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
>
> So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there?
>
The Geode website does so.
Niall
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode.
Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right?
> the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>.
Hi,
The new Apache licensed and branded documentation is available for viewing
through the Geode community web site at http://geode.apache.org/
docs/guide/about_geode.html.
--Mark
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check
> if
> > the PPMC are managing the brand correctly.
> >
> > A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For
> > instance [1] mentions Apache once but has no trademark attribution or
> > mention of ASF.
> >
>
> This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode. It mentions Geode 3 times and the
> main one is the largest font "In-Memory Data Grid powered by Apache Geode".
> The other two are links are to blog posts - one of which was prior to
> entering incubation (their press release about donating to Geode to the
> ASF).
>
> I take your point about the trademark attribution and will raise it.
>
>
> > The German version of the page has no mention of Apache [6], and some
> > attribution here would also be nice [7].
> >
>
> The German page is about Gemfire, not Geode and the only reference are the
> two links to the two blog post mentioned above. AIUI Vendors don't have to
> metion Apache when talking about their own product.
>
>
> >
> > But in other places it’s better like the blogs [2][5] (and more) and here
> > [4] telling people where to go for support.
> >
> > Why is the documentation here [3] MIT licensed and copyright Pivotal? I
> > assume this is just out of date and should be removed or redirect / point
> > people to the new documentation?
> >
>
> The docs have now been donated to the ASF and are checked into the ASF Git
> repo - the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
>
> Niall
>
>
> >
> > Of course the PPMC may be aware of these issues and working on them.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire
> > 2. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/news/become-a-found
> > ing-contributor-of-project-geode
> > 3. https://github.com/project-geode/docs
> > 4. https://discuss.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/206097347-How-c
> > an-I-get-support-for-Geode-
> > 5. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/case-studies/four-
> > real-world-use-cases-for-an-in-memory-data-grid
> > 6. https://pivotal.io/de/big-data/pivotal-gemfire
> > 7. https://pivotal.io/open-source
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if
> the PPMC are managing the brand correctly.
>
> A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For
> instance [1] mentions Apache once but has no trademark attribution or
> mention of ASF.
>
This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode. It mentions Geode 3 times and the
main one is the largest font "In-Memory Data Grid powered by Apache Geode".
The other two are links are to blog posts - one of which was prior to
entering incubation (their press release about donating to Geode to the
ASF).
I take your point about the trademark attribution and will raise it.
> The German version of the page has no mention of Apache [6], and some
> attribution here would also be nice [7].
>
The German page is about Gemfire, not Geode and the only reference are the
two links to the two blog post mentioned above. AIUI Vendors don't have to
metion Apache when talking about their own product.
>
> But in other places it’s better like the blogs [2][5] (and more) and here
> [4] telling people where to go for support.
>
> Why is the documentation here [3] MIT licensed and copyright Pivotal? I
> assume this is just out of date and should be removed or redirect / point
> people to the new documentation?
>
The docs have now been donated to the ASF and are checked into the ASF Git
repo - the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
Niall
>
> Of course the PPMC may be aware of these issues and working on them.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire
> 2. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/news/become-a-found
> ing-contributor-of-project-geode
> 3. https://github.com/project-geode/docs
> 4. https://discuss.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/206097347-How-c
> an-I-get-support-for-Geode-
> 5. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/case-studies/four-
> real-world-use-cases-for-an-in-memory-data-grid
> 6. https://pivotal.io/de/big-data/pivotal-gemfire
> 7. https://pivotal.io/open-source
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Justin, as usual thanks a million for your feedback. That part of the thread
> has now moved to private@geode, but in summary a whole bunch of PMC
> members (including myself) are now working with Pivotal to update a few
> pages ASAP. We're all (including Pivotal) in agreement on what needs to
> be done.
Great! Nothing I saw there was too serious and there were examples where the right thing was being done (that I didn’t include).
As long as the PPMC/PMC is on top of this (and it sounds like they) all is good IMO.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>.
Justin, as usual thanks a million for your feedback. That part of the thread
has now moved to private@geode, but in summary a whole bunch of PMC
members (including myself) are now working with Pivotal to update a few
pages ASAP. We're all (including Pivotal) in agreement on what needs to
be done.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if the PPMC are managing the brand correctly.
>
> A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For instance [1] mentions Apache once but has no trademark attribution or mention of ASF.
> The German version of the page has no mention of Apache [6], and some attribution here would also be nice [7].
>
> But in other places it’s better like the blogs [2][5] (and more) and here [4] telling people where to go for support.
>
> Why is the documentation here [3] MIT licensed and copyright Pivotal? I assume this is just out of date and should be removed or redirect / point people to the new documentation?
>
> Of course the PPMC may be aware of these issues and working on them.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire
> 2. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/news/become-a-founding-contributor-of-project-geode
> 3. https://github.com/project-geode/docs
> 4. https://discuss.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/206097347-How-can-I-get-support-for-Geode-
> 5. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/case-studies/four-real-world-use-cases-for-an-in-memory-data-grid
> 6. https://pivotal.io/de/big-data/pivotal-gemfire
> 7. https://pivotal.io/open-source
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if the PPMC are managing the brand correctly.
A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For instance [1] mentions Apache once but has no trademark attribution or mention of ASF.
The German version of the page has no mention of Apache [6], and some attribution here would also be nice [7].
But in other places it’s better like the blogs [2][5] (and more) and here [4] telling people where to go for support.
Why is the documentation here [3] MIT licensed and copyright Pivotal? I assume this is just out of date and should be removed or redirect / point people to the new documentation?
Of course the PPMC may be aware of these issues and working on them.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire
2. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/news/become-a-founding-contributor-of-project-geode
3. https://github.com/project-geode/docs
4. https://discuss.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/206097347-How-can-I-get-support-for-Geode-
5. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/case-studies/four-real-world-use-cases-for-an-in-memory-data-grid
6. https://pivotal.io/de/big-data/pivotal-gemfire
7. https://pivotal.io/open-source
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>>>>>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of
>>> all
>>>>>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
>>> majority
>>>>>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
>>> spend
>>>>>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
>>> worked
>>>>>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the
>>> issues
>>>>>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
>>>>>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not
>>> going to
>>>>>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
>>>>>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
>>>>>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the
>>> right
>>>>>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved
>>> with
>>>>>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
>>> right
>>>>>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and
>>> except to
>>>>>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
>>> them
>>>>>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves
>>> and
>>>>>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
>>>>>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
>>>>> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
>>>>> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
>>>>> historically cause problems over time.
>>>>
>>>> I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
>>>>
>>>>> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in
>>> the
>>>> Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
>>>> new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
>>>
>>> If it turns the project into a more diverse/dispersed community, I'd say
>>> that's added value. We can argue all night whether that's up to the
>>> IPMC, the project or the board to figure out, I'm not sure we'll agree
>>> there :)
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Surely we serve the
>>>>> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
>>>>> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
>>>>
>>>> I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
>>>> (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
>>>> "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
>>>> votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
>>>> Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
>>>>
>>>> I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity
>>> requirement
>>>> simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
>>>
>>> Except it's not pointless for the foundation, we've seen that. we're
>>> seeing that right now with several projects that either die completely
>>> or take a very wrong turn because someone higher up the food chain
>>> thinks otherwise about the project(s), and that also hurts the
>>> foundation - let's not pretend that never happens. I can't say whether
>>> this would be true for Geode (how would I know?), but a 96+% chunk of
>>> all contributions coming from people affiliated with a single company is
>>> worrisome to me.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
>>>>> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
>>>>> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
>>>>> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
>>>>> building the community first.
>>>>
>>>> Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good
>>> number
>>>> of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with
>>> this
>>>> community.
>>>
>>> I'd say Rich should vote what he feels is right, not what "a good number
>>> of us" think is right. That's not how consensus works.
>>>
>>> You'll notice that I haven't just said "-1, I don't like it". But I also
>>> haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why this isn't a problem,
>>> save a "we're sure it's not a problem" reply.
>>>
>>> If I were to look purely at contributions to the codebase, there is no
>>> indication that this issue is at all being worked on, on the contrary,
>>> if you look at contributions over time, the percentage that is purely
>>> pivotal keeps going up and up, and now sits at >96% in the past 6 months.
>>>
>>> Voting in new committers is one thing, but if it doesn't lead to some
>>> sort of dispersion of who has a deciding role in the project, then I
>>> don't believe the current strategy is working.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, there is little to no recognition that this is even a
>>> potential issue. I'd love to see people at least *acknowledging* that
>>> this is something they have to work on, that'll give us something
>>> tangible to relate to when deciding on a vote.
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps you could re-read my first post, because I believe did acknowledge
>> it.
>
> I didn't read it as such, but this does help towards that :) Thanks.
Btw, this point I wholeheartedly agree with: if Geode gets to graduate, it will
be joining a number of projects that need to be ever vigilant about undue
corporate influence.
From that standpoint, the community had a number of experiences around
brand management, etc. that I believe served as a set of useful lessons in
explaining how to go about this goal in an effective manner. The role of the
board, of course, is central to making sure this goal is always a priority, but
I also believe that this community has learned (and taken to heart) the fact
that IPMC (regardless of a status of the project) and ComDev can be great
resources.
But once again, thanks for stressing this Daniel -- this is one of those things
that can't be stressed enough.
Thanks,
Roman.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>>>>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of
>> all
>>>>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
>> majority
>>>>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
>> spend
>>>>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
>> worked
>>>>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the
>> issues
>>>>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>>>>>
>>>>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
>>>>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not
>> going to
>>>>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
>>>>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
>>>>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the
>> right
>>>>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved
>> with
>>>>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
>> right
>>>>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and
>> except to
>>>>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
>> them
>>>>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves
>> and
>>>>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
>>>>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>>>>
>>>> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
>>>> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
>>>> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
>>>> historically cause problems over time.
>>>
>>> I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
>>>
>>>> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
>>>
>>> I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in
>> the
>>> Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
>>> new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
>>
>> If it turns the project into a more diverse/dispersed community, I'd say
>> that's added value. We can argue all night whether that's up to the
>> IPMC, the project or the board to figure out, I'm not sure we'll agree
>> there :)
>>
>>>
>>>> Surely we serve the
>>>> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
>>>> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
>>>
>>> I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
>>> (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
>>> "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
>>> votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
>>> Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
>>>
>>> I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity
>> requirement
>>> simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
>>
>> Except it's not pointless for the foundation, we've seen that. we're
>> seeing that right now with several projects that either die completely
>> or take a very wrong turn because someone higher up the food chain
>> thinks otherwise about the project(s), and that also hurts the
>> foundation - let's not pretend that never happens. I can't say whether
>> this would be true for Geode (how would I know?), but a 96+% chunk of
>> all contributions coming from people affiliated with a single company is
>> worrisome to me.
>>
>>>
>>>> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
>>>> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
>>>> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
>>>> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
>>>> building the community first.
>>>
>>> Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good
>> number
>>> of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with
>> this
>>> community.
>>
>> I'd say Rich should vote what he feels is right, not what "a good number
>> of us" think is right. That's not how consensus works.
>>
>> You'll notice that I haven't just said "-1, I don't like it". But I also
>> haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why this isn't a problem,
>> save a "we're sure it's not a problem" reply.
>>
>> If I were to look purely at contributions to the codebase, there is no
>> indication that this issue is at all being worked on, on the contrary,
>> if you look at contributions over time, the percentage that is purely
>> pivotal keeps going up and up, and now sits at >96% in the past 6 months.
>>
>> Voting in new committers is one thing, but if it doesn't lead to some
>> sort of dispersion of who has a deciding role in the project, then I
>> don't believe the current strategy is working.
>>
>> Furthermore, there is little to no recognition that this is even a
>> potential issue. I'd love to see people at least *acknowledging* that
>> this is something they have to work on, that'll give us something
>> tangible to relate to when deciding on a vote.
>>
>
> Perhaps you could re-read my first post, because I believe did acknowledge
> it.
I didn't read it as such, but this does help towards that :) Thanks.
With regards,
Daniel.
>
> Niall
>
>
>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Roman.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> >>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of
> all
> >>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
> majority
> >>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
> spend
> >>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
> >>>>>
> >>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>
> >>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
> worked
> >>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the
> issues
> >>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
> >>>
> >>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> >>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not
> going to
> >>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
> >>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
> >>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the
> right
> >>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved
> with
> >>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
> right
> >>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and
> except to
> >>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
> them
> >>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves
> and
> >>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
> >>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
> >>
> >> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
> >> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
> >> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
> >> historically cause problems over time.
> >
> > I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
> >
> >> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
> >
> > I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in
> the
> > Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
> > new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
>
> If it turns the project into a more diverse/dispersed community, I'd say
> that's added value. We can argue all night whether that's up to the
> IPMC, the project or the board to figure out, I'm not sure we'll agree
> there :)
>
> >
> >> Surely we serve the
> >> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
> >> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
> >
> > I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
> > (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
> > "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
> > votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
> > Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
> >
> > I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity
> requirement
> > simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
>
> Except it's not pointless for the foundation, we've seen that. we're
> seeing that right now with several projects that either die completely
> or take a very wrong turn because someone higher up the food chain
> thinks otherwise about the project(s), and that also hurts the
> foundation - let's not pretend that never happens. I can't say whether
> this would be true for Geode (how would I know?), but a 96+% chunk of
> all contributions coming from people affiliated with a single company is
> worrisome to me.
>
> >
> >> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
> >> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
> >> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
> >> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
> >> building the community first.
> >
> > Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good
> number
> > of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with
> this
> > community.
>
> I'd say Rich should vote what he feels is right, not what "a good number
> of us" think is right. That's not how consensus works.
>
> You'll notice that I haven't just said "-1, I don't like it". But I also
> haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why this isn't a problem,
> save a "we're sure it's not a problem" reply.
>
> If I were to look purely at contributions to the codebase, there is no
> indication that this issue is at all being worked on, on the contrary,
> if you look at contributions over time, the percentage that is purely
> pivotal keeps going up and up, and now sits at >96% in the past 6 months.
>
> Voting in new committers is one thing, but if it doesn't lead to some
> sort of dispersion of who has a deciding role in the project, then I
> don't believe the current strategy is working.
>
> Furthermore, there is little to no recognition that this is even a
> potential issue. I'd love to see people at least *acknowledging* that
> this is something they have to work on, that'll give us something
> tangible to relate to when deciding on a vote.
>
Perhaps you could re-read my first post, because I believe did acknowledge
it.
Niall
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
I am frankly not informed enough to vote up or down. I remain concerned at
the rate we turn out projects that are monocultures but I will trust the
people to whom this decision is delegated.
On Nov 8, 2016 18:51, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern
> with
> >>>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of
> all
> >>>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast
> majority
> >>>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further
> spend
> >>>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as
> viable?
> >>>>>>
> >>>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've
> worked
> >>>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the
> issues
> >>>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
> >>>>
> >>>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> >>>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not
> going to
> >>>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better
> with
> >>>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have
> they
> >>>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the
> right
> >>>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved
> with
> >>>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the
> right
> >>>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and
> except to
> >>>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for
> them
> >>>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves
> and
> >>>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why
> I
> >>>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
> >>>
> >>> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
> >>> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects
> that
> >>> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
> >>> historically cause problems over time.
> >>
> >> I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of
> problems.
> >>
> >>> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
> >>
> >> I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in
> the
> >> Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
> >> new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
> >
> > If it turns the project into a more diverse/dispersed community, I'd say
> > that's added value. We can argue all night whether that's up to the
> > IPMC, the project or the board to figure out, I'm not sure we'll agree
> > there :)
> >
> >>
> >>> Surely we serve the
> >>> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
> >>> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP
> status?
> >>
> >> I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
> >> (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
> >> "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
> >> votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
> >> Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
> >>
> >> I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity
> requirement
> >> simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
> >
> > Except it's not pointless for the foundation, we've seen that. we're
> > seeing that right now with several projects that either die completely
> > or take a very wrong turn because someone higher up the food chain
> > thinks otherwise about the project(s), and that also hurts the
> > foundation - let's not pretend that never happens. I can't say whether
> > this would be true for Geode (how would I know?), but a 96+% chunk of
> > all contributions coming from people affiliated with a single company is
> > worrisome to me.
> >
> >>
> >>> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
> >>> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more
> concerned
> >>> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting
> to
> >>> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
> >>> building the community first.
> >>
> >> Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good
> number
> >> of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with
> this
> >> community.
> >
> > I'd say Rich should vote what he feels is right, not what "a good number
> > of us" think is right. That's not how consensus works.
>
> True. But it is *my* right to try and convince Rich to change his mind in a
> certain direction. Whether he gets convinced or not -- is, as you pointed
> out,
> up to him.
>
> > You'll notice that I haven't just said "-1, I don't like it". But I also
> > haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why this isn't a problem,
> > save a "we're sure it's not a problem" reply.
>
> I don't think we can present any material evidence that project is going
> to be free from "we own it" mentality for ANY given project. First of all,
> there's no way to predict the future. Which means that the strongest
> argument we can present is only this: "the behavior during 19 months
> hasn't exhibited signs of 'we own it' mentality and all the signs point to
> the fact that it is unlikely to be a problem". This is the argument that is
> being presented here.
>
> Now, as with any argument that is not rooted is science, but rather comes
> from observing social dynamics -- you never ever going to have an ironclad
> opinion (short of, may be personally spending enough time yourself
> observing
> said social dynamics). That is why the opinion of mentors and IPMC members
> embedded in the community and some of the data points presented in the
> DISCUSS
> thread (like the fact that the PMC chair is at this point a Pivotal
> alumni, no
> longer working for the company but still active in the project) could
> help boost
> your level of comfort in that we're making the right call here.
>
> Honestly, this is the best we can do. And just like with the other choice
> that
> a lot of people are facing today -- once you've heard all the sides (and
> you
> really should -- echochambers are awful!) you'll have to make your own
> call.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>>>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
>>>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
>>>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
>>>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>>>>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've worked
>>>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
>>>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>>>>
>>>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
>>>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going to
>>>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
>>>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
>>>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
>>>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
>>>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the right
>>>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except to
>>>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for them
>>>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
>>>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
>>>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>>>
>>> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
>>> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
>>> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
>>> historically cause problems over time.
>>
>> I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
>>
>>> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
>>
>> I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in the
>> Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
>> new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
>
> If it turns the project into a more diverse/dispersed community, I'd say
> that's added value. We can argue all night whether that's up to the
> IPMC, the project or the board to figure out, I'm not sure we'll agree
> there :)
>
>>
>>> Surely we serve the
>>> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
>>> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
>>
>> I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
>> (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
>> "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
>> votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
>> Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
>>
>> I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity requirement
>> simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
>
> Except it's not pointless for the foundation, we've seen that. we're
> seeing that right now with several projects that either die completely
> or take a very wrong turn because someone higher up the food chain
> thinks otherwise about the project(s), and that also hurts the
> foundation - let's not pretend that never happens. I can't say whether
> this would be true for Geode (how would I know?), but a 96+% chunk of
> all contributions coming from people affiliated with a single company is
> worrisome to me.
>
>>
>>> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
>>> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
>>> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
>>> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
>>> building the community first.
>>
>> Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good number
>> of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with this
>> community.
>
> I'd say Rich should vote what he feels is right, not what "a good number
> of us" think is right. That's not how consensus works.
True. But it is *my* right to try and convince Rich to change his mind in a
certain direction. Whether he gets convinced or not -- is, as you pointed out,
up to him.
> You'll notice that I haven't just said "-1, I don't like it". But I also
> haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why this isn't a problem,
> save a "we're sure it's not a problem" reply.
I don't think we can present any material evidence that project is going
to be free from "we own it" mentality for ANY given project. First of all,
there's no way to predict the future. Which means that the strongest
argument we can present is only this: "the behavior during 19 months
hasn't exhibited signs of 'we own it' mentality and all the signs point to
the fact that it is unlikely to be a problem". This is the argument that is
being presented here.
Now, as with any argument that is not rooted is science, but rather comes
from observing social dynamics -- you never ever going to have an ironclad
opinion (short of, may be personally spending enough time yourself observing
said social dynamics). That is why the opinion of mentors and IPMC members
embedded in the community and some of the data points presented in the DISCUSS
thread (like the fact that the PMC chair is at this point a Pivotal alumni, no
longer working for the company but still active in the project) could
help boost
your level of comfort in that we're making the right call here.
Honestly, this is the best we can do. And just like with the other choice that
a lot of people are facing today -- once you've heard all the sides (and you
really should -- echochambers are awful!) you'll have to make your own call.
Thanks,
Roman.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>>>>> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
>>>>> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
>>>>> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
>>>>> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>>>>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've worked
>>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
>>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>>>
>>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
>>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going to
>>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
>>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
>>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
>>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
>>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the right
>>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except to
>>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for them
>>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
>>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
>>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>>
>> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
>> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
>> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
>> historically cause problems over time.
>
> I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
>
>> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
>
> I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in the
> Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
> new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
If it turns the project into a more diverse/dispersed community, I'd say
that's added value. We can argue all night whether that's up to the
IPMC, the project or the board to figure out, I'm not sure we'll agree
there :)
>
>> Surely we serve the
>> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
>> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
>
> I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
> (regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
> "Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
> votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
> Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
>
> I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity requirement
> simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
Except it's not pointless for the foundation, we've seen that. we're
seeing that right now with several projects that either die completely
or take a very wrong turn because someone higher up the food chain
thinks otherwise about the project(s), and that also hurts the
foundation - let's not pretend that never happens. I can't say whether
this would be true for Geode (how would I know?), but a 96+% chunk of
all contributions coming from people affiliated with a single company is
worrisome to me.
>
>> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
>> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
>> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
>> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
>> building the community first.
>
> Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good number
> of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with this
> community.
I'd say Rich should vote what he feels is right, not what "a good number
of us" think is right. That's not how consensus works.
You'll notice that I haven't just said "-1, I don't like it". But I also
haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why this isn't a problem,
save a "we're sure it's not a problem" reply.
If I were to look purely at contributions to the codebase, there is no
indication that this issue is at all being worked on, on the contrary,
if you look at contributions over time, the percentage that is purely
pivotal keeps going up and up, and now sits at >96% in the past 6 months.
Voting in new committers is one thing, but if it doesn't lead to some
sort of dispersion of who has a deciding role in the project, then I
don't believe the current strategy is working.
Furthermore, there is little to no recognition that this is even a
potential issue. I'd love to see people at least *acknowledging* that
this is something they have to work on, that'll give us something
tangible to relate to when deciding on a vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>> >
>>> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>>> > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
>>> > commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
>>> > of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>>> >
>>> > Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
>>> > resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>>> >
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've worked
>> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
>> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>>
>> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
>> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going to
>> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
>> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
>> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
>> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
>> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the right
>> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except to
>> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for them
>> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
>> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
>> think we should vote for them to graduate.
>
> Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
> board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
> are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
> historically cause problems over time.
I think that other discussion addresses a very different set of problems.
> Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated?
I'd rather flip your argument around and say: at this point sitting in the
Incubator adds no value to the project nor does it teach anything
new or useful to its PPMC or a community at large.
> Surely we serve the
> Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
> (and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
I disagree. The Incubator is a place to make sure that the community
(regardless of its composition) truly understands and practices the
"Apache Way". As has been suggested on this thread by a number of
votes from project's mentors and IPMC members embedded in the
Geode community that mission has been accomplished.
I see no reason to hold the project hostage over the diversity requirement
simply because it is pointless for IPMC, project and the foundation.
> I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
> should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
> with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
> see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
> building the community first.
Then you really should be voting "yes" on this thread. There's a good number
of us on IPMC who believe that "we own it" is really not a problem with this
community.
Thanks,
Roman.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>> >
>> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>> > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
>> > commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
>> > of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>> >
>> > Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
>> > resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>> >
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've worked
> hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
> raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
>
> In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
> graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going to
> repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
> served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
> demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
> direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
> and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the right
> direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except to
> change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for them
> being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
> theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
> think we should vote for them to graduate.
Given the discussions around single-vendor projects that are raging on
board@ I would have to agree with Daniel's concerns here. Projects that
are heavily dominated by a single vendor/company/organization
historically cause problems over time.
Is there a huge rush to get this project graduated? Surely we serve the
Foundation, and this project, better, by ensuring that this problem
(and, yes, it's a problem) is addressed before we grant them TLP status?
I'm personally less concerned with the sustainability of the project
should the company opt out of working on the project, and more concerned
with the kind of monoculture "we own it" problems that we're starting to
see crop up in other projects that were allowed to graduate without
building the community first.
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>
> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
> commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
> of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
>
> Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
> resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
>
Hi Daniel,
I've observed this project since it joined the incubator and they've worked
hard to create an open and welcoming community and to fix all the issues
raised that could be barriers to their graduation.
In terms of percentages, these things have been debated previously in
graduation of projects such as Ignite, Flume, Tez etc and I'm not going to
repeat the arguments from those discussions. Geode would be better with
served with a wider community, but I think what matters is 1) have they
demonstrated the behaviors we expect and 2) are they moving in the right
direction. Geode is a great community and a pleasure to be involved with
and I would say yes to both of these. I believe they are going in the right
direction to make this project less dependent on one company and except to
change the percentages you've pointed out, theres no purpose left for them
being in the incubator. They've shown that they can manage themselves and
theres enough independent oversight to mitigate concerns which is why I
think we should vote for them to graduate.
Niall
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 11/07/2016 07:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3010) wrote:
> > +1 (binding). Great work!
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
> > Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
> > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-502
> > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> >
> > On 11/7/16, 10:16 AM, "gchase@gmail.com on behalf of Greg Chase" <
> gchase@gmail.com on behalf of greg@gregchase.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1!
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag <nn...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > --Mark
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <
> adongre@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <
> wikier@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > good luck, guys!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <
> roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > > > > > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > > > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > > > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal
> vote.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > > > > > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator
> because...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the
> support,
> > > > > > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Resolution:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the
> best
> > > > > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > > > > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > > > > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
> the
> > > > > > > > public, related to a data management platform that
> provides
> > > > > > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive
> applications
> > > > > > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > > > > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode
> Project",
> > > > > > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > > > > > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> > > > > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > > > > > > > related to a data management platform that provides
> real-time,
> > > > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications
> throughout
> > > > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache
> Geode" be
> > > > > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > > > > > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the
> chair
> > > > > > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary
> responsibility
> > > > > > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > > > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it
> further
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be
> and
> > > > > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of
> the
> > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > > > > > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache
> Geode, to
> > > > > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of
> the
> > > > > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > > > > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or
> disqualification,
> > > > > > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and
> hereby is
> > > > > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > > > > > > > encourage open development and increased participation
> in the
> > > > > > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > > > > > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the
> Apache
> > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the
> Apache
> > > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache
> Incubator
> > > > > > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> > > > > ---------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.
> apache.org
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.
> > > org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Sergio Fernández
> > > > > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > > > > Redlink GmbH
> > > > > > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > > > > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > > > > w: http://redlink.co
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
of tickets and email, as well as a 73% stake in the proposed PMC?
Is the IPMC satisfied that, should this company opt to not further spend
resources on this project, that the project would still be as viable?
With regards,
Daniel.
On 11/07/2016 07:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3010) wrote:
> +1 (binding). Great work!
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
> Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-502
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> On 11/7/16, 10:16 AM, "gchase@gmail.com on behalf of Greg Chase" <gchase@gmail.com on behalf of greg@gregchase.com> wrote:
>
> +1!
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag <nn...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > --Mark
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fern�ndez <wi...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > good luck, guys!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <
> > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > > > > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > > > > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> > > > > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Resolution:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > > > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > > > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > > > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > > > > > > public, related to a data management platform that provides
> > > > > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > > > > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > > > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> > > > > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > > > > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> > > > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > > > > > > related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> > > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> > > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> > > > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > > > > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > > > > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > > > > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > > > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > > > > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > > > > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> > > > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > > > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > > > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > > > > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> > > > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > > > > > > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > > > > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > > > > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > > > > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > > > > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ---------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.
> > org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sergio Fern�ndez
> > > > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > > > Redlink GmbH
> > > > > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > > > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > > > w: http://redlink.co
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3010)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
+1 (binding). Great work!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-502
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On 11/7/16, 10:16 AM, "gchase@gmail.com on behalf of Greg Chase" <gchase@gmail.com on behalf of greg@gregchase.com> wrote:
+1!
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag <nn...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > --Mark
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > good luck, guys!
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > > > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > > > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> > > > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Resolution:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > > > >
> > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > > > > > public, related to a data management platform that provides
> > > > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > > > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> > > > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > > > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> > > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > > > > > related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> > > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > > > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > > > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > > > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > > > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > > > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> > > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > > > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> > > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > > > > > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > > > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > > > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > > > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > > > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > > > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.
> org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sergio Fernández
> > > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > > Redlink GmbH
> > > > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > > w: http://redlink.co
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Greg Chase <gr...@gregchase.com>.
+1!
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag <nn...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > --Mark
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > good luck, guys!
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > > > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > > > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> > > > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Resolution:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > > > >
> > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > > > > > public, related to a data management platform that provides
> > > > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > > > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> > > > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > > > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> > > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > > > > > related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> > > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > > > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > > > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > > > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > > > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > > > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> > > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > > > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> > > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > > > > > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > > > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > > > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > > > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > > > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > > > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.
> org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sergio Fernández
> > > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > > Redlink GmbH
> > > > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > > w: http://redlink.co
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Nabarun Nag <nn...@pivotal.io>.
+1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> --Mark
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > good luck, guys!
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> > > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > > >
> > > > > Resolution:
> > > > >
> > > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > > >
> > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > > > > public, related to a data management platform that provides
> > > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > >
> > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> > > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > > >
> > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> > > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > > > > related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > > >
> > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > >
> > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > > >
> > > > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> > > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > > > >
> > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > > > > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > > >
> > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > > >
> > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergio Fernández
> > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > Redlink GmbH
> > > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > > w: http://redlink.co
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>.
+1
--Mark
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > good luck, guys!
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
> > > >
> > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> > > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > > >
> > > > Resolution:
> > > >
> > > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > > >
> > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > > > public, related to a data management platform that provides
> > > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > >
> > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > > > Foundation; and be it further
> > > >
> > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > > > related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > >
> > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > >
> > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > > > Apache Geode Project:
> > > >
> > > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > > >
> > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > > >
> > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > > > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > > >
> > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > > >
> > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925
> > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > w: http://redlink.co
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> good luck, guys!
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > > and at the IPMC level:
> > > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
> > >
> > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> > > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> > >
> > > Resolution:
> > >
> > > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> > >
> > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > > public, related to a data management platform that provides
> > > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > >
> > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > > Foundation; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > > related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> > > consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > > Apache Geode Project:
> > >
> > > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> > >
> > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
+1
good luck, guys!
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> > and at the IPMC level:
> > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
> >
> > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> > Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> > Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
> >
> > Resolution:
> >
> > Establish the Apache Geode Project
> >
> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > public, related to a data management platform that provides
> > real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> > throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > Foundation; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> > consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > Apache Geode Project:
> >
> > * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> > * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> > * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> > * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> > * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> > * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> > * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> > * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> > * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> > * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> > * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> > * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> > * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> > * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> > * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> > * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> > * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> > * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> > * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> > * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> > * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> > * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> > * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> > * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> > * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> > * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> > * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> > * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> > * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > Apache Geode Project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > Project are hereafter discharged.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
+1
On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
>
> Resolution:
>
> Establish the Apache Geode Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a data management platform that provides
> real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Geode Project:
>
> * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
+1 [binding]
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 12:58PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
> Apache Geode from the incubator to top level project.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Geode from the Incubator because...
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> Roman (on behalf of the Apache Geode PPMC).
>
> Resolution:
>
> Establish the Apache Geode Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a data management platform that provides
> real-time, consistent access to data-intensive applications
> throughout widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Geode Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a data management platform that provides real-time,
> consistent access to data-intensive applications throughout
> widely distributed cloud architectures.
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Geode" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Geode Project:
>
> * Anilkumar Gingade <ag...@apache.org>
> * Anthony Baker <ab...@apache.org>
> * Ashvin Agrawal <as...@apache.org>
> * Avinash Dongre <ad...@apache.org>
> * Barry Oglesby < boglesby@apache.org>
> * Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@apache.org>
> * Dan Smith <up...@apache.org>
> * Darrel Schneider <ds...@apache.org>
> * Dave Barnes <db...@apache.org>
> * Eric Shu <es...@apache.org>
> * Greg Chase <gr...@apache.org>
> * Hitesh Khamesra <hi...@apache.org>
> * Jason Huynh <ja...@apache.org>
> * Jens Deppe <je...@apache.org>
> * Jianxia Chen <jc...@apache.org>
> * Jinmei Liao <ji...@apache.org>
> * John Blum <jx...@apache.org>
> * Karen Miller <km...@apache.org>
> * Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> * Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> * Mark Bretl <mb...@apache.org>
> * Nabarun Nag <nn...@apache.org>
> * Niall Pemberton <ni...@apache.org>
> * Nitin Lamba <nl...@apache.org>
> * Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> * Sai Boorlagadda <sa...@apache.org>
> * Swapnil Bawaskar <sb...@apache.org>
> * Udo Kohlmeyer <ud...@apache.org>
> * William Markito <ma...@apache.org>
> * Xiaojian Zhou <zh...@apache.org>
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mark Bretl
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Geode, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Geode PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Geode Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Geode podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org