You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> on 2006/05/16 19:31:41 UTC
[VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
Please vote to approve this release binary
[ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
blessing to ship this release officially.
Here's my +1
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Jonas Lim <jl...@exist.com>.
Thanks Hiram!
Here's my +1 :)
Regards,
Jonas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
To: <ac...@geronimo.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
> Hi Jonas,
>
> We has installed some RewriteRules to handle the changed links but the
> redirects do not seem to be working. So I just added a symbolic link
> that should take care of the problem once the content gets mirrors to
> the webserver.
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> On 5/17/06, Jonas Lim <jl...@exist.com> wrote:
>> corrected some broken links on the readme on svn trunk . I wonder if we
>> can
>> create a new set of distro with this minor correction?
>>
>> regards,
>> Jonas
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James Strachan" <ja...@gmail.com>
>> To: <ac...@geronimo.apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 1:31 AM
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
>>
>>
>> > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
>> > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
>> > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
>> >
>> > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
>> > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>> >
>> > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
>> > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release binary
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
>> > blessing to ship this release officially.
>> >
>> > Here's my +1
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > James
>> > -------
>> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Hi Jonas,
We has installed some RewriteRules to handle the changed links but the
redirects do not seem to be working. So I just added a symbolic link
that should take care of the problem once the content gets mirrors to
the webserver.
Regards,
Hiram
On 5/17/06, Jonas Lim <jl...@exist.com> wrote:
> corrected some broken links on the readme on svn trunk . I wonder if we can
> create a new set of distro with this minor correction?
>
> regards,
> Jonas
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Strachan" <ja...@gmail.com>
> To: <ac...@geronimo.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 1:31 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
>
>
> > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> >
> > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> >
> > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release binary
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >
> > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > blessing to ship this release officially.
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Jonas Lim <jl...@exist.com>.
corrected some broken links on the readme on svn trunk . I wonder if we can
create a new set of distro with this minor correction?
regards,
Jonas
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Strachan" <ja...@gmail.com>
To: <ac...@geronimo.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 1:31 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
> We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Rob DellaFortuna <ro...@gmail.com>.
For this release, are there plans to bring the Openwire dotnet client up to
spec with the current 4.0 java implementation?
Cheers,
Rob.
On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. quick status report on the 718 issue. I applied the patch and the
> good news is that subsequent openwire version is still compatible with
> version that is in the current 4.0 release candidate that we voted on.
> This is because our Java implementation of openwire does not
> use/validate the size prefix on each command. That size prefix was
> put there to support future NIO based transports and other openwire
> implementations where having the size prefix makes it easier to
> implement the protocol.
>
> So I'm all for just including the patch as bug fix in the next (4.1)
> release of activemq. So I'm still at +1 for releasing the current
> binary.
>
> On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > so 718 was partially valid. I'm going to rebuild and test the new
> > client against the 4.0 rc. If the patch does not break compatibility
> > with 4.0, then I think we can let 4.0 go out as is. if it does break
> > compatibility then I think we will need to recut a new release
> > candidate for 4.0.
> >
> > Any opinions?
> >
> >
> > On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > Opps. I just reviewed that patch. and It does not seem to be valid.
> > > I think I may have jumped the gun on putting in my -1. So I'm
> > > retracting my -1 for now, and asking for anybody out there that is
> > > interested in the openwire internals to peek into the AMQ-718 and
> > > double check me.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > > I retract my +1.. This issue has just been reported:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
> > > >
> > > > We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix
> > > > now, we will never be able to fix.
> > > >
> > > > So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the
> provided
> > > > patch. Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > > > > James Strachan wrote:
> > > > > > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've
> tested it
> > > > > > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various
> release
> > > > > > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files
> etc)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch
> up...
> > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release
> notes:
> > > > > >
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote to approve this release binary
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for
> their
> > > > > > blessing to ship this release officially.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's my +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Congrats on all the great work!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Alan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Hiram
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Ok. quick status report on the 718 issue. I applied the patch and the
good news is that subsequent openwire version is still compatible with
version that is in the current 4.0 release candidate that we voted on.
This is because our Java implementation of openwire does not
use/validate the size prefix on each command. That size prefix was
put there to support future NIO based transports and other openwire
implementations where having the size prefix makes it easier to
implement the protocol.
So I'm all for just including the patch as bug fix in the next (4.1)
release of activemq. So I'm still at +1 for releasing the current
binary.
On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> so 718 was partially valid. I'm going to rebuild and test the new
> client against the 4.0 rc. If the patch does not break compatibility
> with 4.0, then I think we can let 4.0 go out as is. if it does break
> compatibility then I think we will need to recut a new release
> candidate for 4.0.
>
> Any opinions?
>
>
> On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Opps. I just reviewed that patch. and It does not seem to be valid.
> > I think I may have jumped the gun on putting in my -1. So I'm
> > retracting my -1 for now, and asking for anybody out there that is
> > interested in the openwire internals to peek into the AMQ-718 and
> > double check me.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > I retract my +1.. This issue has just been reported:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
> > >
> > > We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix
> > > now, we will never be able to fix.
> > >
> > > So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the provided
> > > patch. Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk!
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > > > James Strachan wrote:
> > > > > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> > > > > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> > > > > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
> > > > >
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> > > > >
> > > > > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> > > > > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote to approve this release binary
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > > > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > > > >
> > > > > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > > > > blessing to ship this release officially.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's my +1
> > > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Congrats on all the great work!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Alan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
so 718 was partially valid. I'm going to rebuild and test the new
client against the 4.0 rc. If the patch does not break compatibility
with 4.0, then I think we can let 4.0 go out as is. if it does break
compatibility then I think we will need to recut a new release
candidate for 4.0.
Any opinions?
On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Opps. I just reviewed that patch. and It does not seem to be valid.
> I think I may have jumped the gun on putting in my -1. So I'm
> retracting my -1 for now, and asking for anybody out there that is
> interested in the openwire internals to peek into the AMQ-718 and
> double check me.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > I retract my +1.. This issue has just been reported:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
> >
> > We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix
> > now, we will never be able to fix.
> >
> > So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the provided
> > patch. Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk!
> >
> >
> > On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > > James Strachan wrote:
> > > > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> > > > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> > > > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> > > >
> > > > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> > > > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> > > >
> > > > Please vote to approve this release binary
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > > >
> > > > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > > > blessing to ship this release officially.
> > > >
> > > > Here's my +1
> > > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Congrats on all the great work!
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Opps. I just reviewed that patch. and It does not seem to be valid.
I think I may have jumped the gun on putting in my -1. So I'm
retracting my -1 for now, and asking for anybody out there that is
interested in the openwire internals to peek into the AMQ-718 and
double check me.
Thanks!
On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> I retract my +1.. This issue has just been reported:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
>
> We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix
> now, we will never be able to fix.
>
> So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the provided
> patch. Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk!
>
>
> On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > James Strachan wrote:
> > > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> > > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> > > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> > >
> > >
> > > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> > >
> > > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> > > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release binary
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > > blessing to ship this release officially.
> > >
> > > Here's my +1
> > >
> > +1
> >
> > Congrats on all the great work!
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
I retract my +1.. This issue has just been reported:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718
We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix
now, we will never be able to fix.
So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the provided
patch. Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk!
On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> James Strachan wrote:
> > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> >
> >
> > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> >
> > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release binary
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >
> > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > blessing to ship this release officially.
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> +1
>
> Congrats on all the great work!
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
James Strachan wrote:
> We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
>
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
>
> Here's my +1
>
+1
Congrats on all the great work!
Regards,
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gu...@worldonline.fr>.
+1
Guillaume
James Strachan wrote:
> We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
>
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
>
> Here's my +1
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Adrian Co <ac...@exist.com>.
+1
Regards,
Adrian Co
>
>
>
>>On May 16, 2006, at 10:31 AM, James Strachan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
>>>out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
>>>requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>>>
>>>http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/
>>>incubator-activemq/distributions/
>>>
>>>The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
>>>http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>>>
>>>if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
>>>http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>>>
>>>Please vote to approve this release binary
>>>
>>>[ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
>>>[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>>>
>>>If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
>>>blessing to ship this release officially.
>>>
>>>Here's my +1
>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>James
>>>-------
>>>http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Fritz Oconer <fo...@exist.com>.
+1
Regards,
Fritz
> On May 16, 2006, at 10:31 AM, James Strachan wrote:
>
> > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/
> > incubator-activemq/distributions/
> >
> > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
> >
> > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release binary
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >
> > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > blessing to ship this release officially.
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
+1
-dain
On May 16, 2006, at 10:31 AM, James Strachan wrote:
> We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/
> incubator-activemq/distributions/
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by John Sisson <jr...@gmail.com>.
+1
John
James Strachan wrote:
> We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
>
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
>
> Here's my +1
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 5/16/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
Castor - http://castor.org/
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
+1
I want to thank everyone that has been involved in this long release
and testing process. It has made ActiveMQ an outstanding piece of
software!
On 5/16/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Re: [VOTE] Release 4.0 of ActiveMQ
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1
cheers,
Rob
On 16 May 2006, at 18:31, James Strachan wrote:
> We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
> out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
> requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/
> incubator-activemq/distributions/
>
> The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up...
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html
>
> if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes:
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release
>
> Please vote to approve this release binary
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> blessing to ship this release officially.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/