[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2229) Making ContainerId long type

["Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14048495#comment-14048495 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-2229:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12653313/YARN-2229-wip.01.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 javac{color:red}.  The patch appears to cause the build to fail.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/4152//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Making ContainerId long type
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2229
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Tsuyoshi OZAWA
>            Assignee: Tsuyoshi OZAWA
>         Attachments: YARN-2229-wip.01.patch
>
>
> On YARN-2052, we changed containerId format: upper 10 bits are for epoch, lower 22 bits are for sequence number of Ids. This is for preserving semantics of {{ContainerId#getId()}}, {{ContainerId#toString()}}, {{ContainerId#compareTo()}}, {{ContainerId#equals}}, and {{ConverterUtils#toContainerId}}. One concern is epoch can overflow after RM restarts 1024 times.
> To avoid the problem, its better to make containerId long. We need to define the new format of container Id with preserving backward compatibility on this JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)