You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Simon Pepping <sp...@leverkruid.eu> on 2008/04/28 21:36:00 UTC

Re: [Bug 44885] New: fo:inline-container implementation

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 05:03:07PM -0700, bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> This Bugzilla entry will be used for the moment to keep track of the progress
> of an implementation for fo:inline-container. The related changes are
> restricted to a handful of classes, so branching seemed like overkill. No
> commits to the trunk yet, since I see some possible overlap with Simon's
> branch.

You should not let yourself be stopped by my work. It is not going
forward very much at the moment, and in any case I will catch up with
commits to trunk.

Simon

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu

Re: [Bug 44885] New: fo:inline-container implementation

Posted by Andreas Delmelle <an...@telenet.be>.
On Apr 28, 2008, at 21:36, Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 05:03:07PM -0700, bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
>> This Bugzilla entry will be used for the moment to keep track of  
>> the progress
>> of an implementation for fo:inline-container. The related changes are
>> restricted to a handful of classes, so branching seemed like  
>> overkill. No
>> commits to the trunk yet, since I see some possible overlap with  
>> Simon's
>> branch.
>
> You should not let yourself be stopped by my work. It is not going
> forward very much at the moment, and in any case I will catch up with
> commits to trunk.

OK, thanks. I'll keep that in mind. I already checked closer, and the  
overlap seems to be minimal after all. The only major change is the  
addition of InlineContainerLM.
The changes to the other files in the layoutmgr package are limited  
to adding a few accessors or changing visibility to make information  
accessible from within the layoutmgr.inline package.

Anyway, the patch still needs some cleanup and additional testcases  
etc. Due to some copy-pasting from BlockContainerLM, there's  
obviously a lot of code-duplication and still some unused parts, and  
so on...
So the Bugzilla is more meant as a preview, for people who'd already  
like to play with it themselves.


Cheers

Andreas