You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ojb-user@db.apache.org by sa...@04web.com on 2004/06/22 11:31:17 UTC
ojb-blank libs
The link to "additional required libraries" points to severall libraries
that are needed but they are already included on the source
distribution.
The ones that are missing, in order to execute the ojb-blank target are:
- jdo.jar
- jdori.jar
- j2ee.jar
Pedro Salgado
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
Re: ojb-blank libs
Posted by sa...@04web.com.
> salgado.pc@04web.com wrote:
>
I understood :)... and that took some time (registration and j2ee
download) :(
> Btw, We will make a pre-compiled ojb-blank.jar available with the 1.0
> (which does not need j2ee or jdo libraries).
That will certainly be a nice to have.
I am finishing a OJB/Torque application setup (to be used over and over
again through ant) so that I dont need to install ojb/torque on all
projects to generate my db or model. The idea is to have the database
settings on the severall property files on different projects so that I
can reuse the ant targets on that application.
It also helps when using on a specific db (because of licences, for
example) and deploying on another... or using the same db but with
different parameters (URLs, users, etc). It also makes it easy to handle
the db configurations issues if a "db dictionary" is implemented.
Thank you,
Pedro Salgado
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
Re: ojb-blank libs
Posted by Thomas Dudziak <to...@first.fhg.de>.
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>Look at how the FreeTTS project handles the "Legal/License" issues of the
>dist or jars.
>
>they wrap the jars in an original license agreement, then the
>user/developer can accept or decline the agreements.
>
>
We might do that (though there might be an Apache policy regarding
non-Apache compatible licenses that would prevent us from doing so), but
these libraries are only required for building OJB from source so its
probably easier to modify the build file to allow building OJB form
source without the components that require these libraries. And if
somebody wants to use these components, then she should/has to get this
other stuff (J2EE and/or JDO RI) anyway.
Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
Re: ojb-blank libs
Posted by Jason Pyeron <jp...@pyerotechnics.com>.
Look at how the FreeTTS project handles the "Legal/License" issues of the
dist or jars.
they wrap the jars in an original license agreement, then the
user/developer can accept or decline the agreements.
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
> salgado.pc@04web.com wrote:
>
> > The ones that are missing, in order to execute the ojb-blank target are:
> >
> > - jdo.jar
> > - jdori.jar
> > - j2ee.jar
> >
> >
> Due to license issues, we're not allowed to bundle them with OJB, but
> rather the user has to download them manually. Currently you need to add
> the j2ee libraries (from Java J2EE SDK from http://java.sun.com) and jdo
> libraries (also from http://java.sun.com, search for JDO RI) to the lib
> subfolder in order to build OJB from source which is a prerequisite for
> building the ojb-blank target.
> Btw, We will make a pre-compiled ojb-blank.jar available with the 1.0
> (which does not need j2ee or jdo libraries).
>
> Tom
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com -
- Partner & Sr. Manager Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. -
- +1 (443) 451-2697 500 West University Parkway #1S -
- +1 (410) 808-6646 (c) Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 -
- -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and
notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you
is prohibited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
Re: ojb-blank libs
Posted by Thomas Dudziak <to...@first.fhg.de>.
salgado.pc@04web.com wrote:
> The link to "additional required libraries" points to severall libraries
>that are needed but they are already included on the source
>distribution.
>
>
Right, this page specifies libraries that are only required by certain
parts of OJB and thus might not be need by everyone.
> The ones that are missing, in order to execute the ojb-blank target are:
>
> - jdo.jar
> - jdori.jar
> - j2ee.jar
>
>
Due to license issues, we're not allowed to bundle them with OJB, but
rather the user has to download them manually. Currently you need to add
the j2ee libraries (from Java J2EE SDK from http://java.sun.com) and jdo
libraries (also from http://java.sun.com, search for JDO RI) to the lib
subfolder in order to build OJB from source which is a prerequisite for
building the ojb-blank target.
Btw, We will make a pre-compiled ojb-blank.jar available with the 1.0
(which does not need j2ee or jdo libraries).
Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org