You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Chris Mawata <ch...@gmail.com> on 2013/02/18 13:32:13 UTC
valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?
Hi all,
I am using Struts 2.3.4.1 and i noticed the notation
[n].parameterName to get a parameter of a given name
when the first ocurrance is not the one you want is
not working. I can't find any documentation that it was
removed. Can anyone point me to something? I might
not be searching by the technically correct name.
Thanks
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?
Posted by Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com>.
Yep, sure enough--interesting.
I think I'll start spinning through the docs and updating some stuff; that
was my claim to fame at one point--need to earn those stripes.
Dave
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
<mc...@apache.org>wrote:
> Looking at the regex on the bottom of the page, I'd say: it's no more
> allowed (http://goo.gl/oUlb6 click on the green button to test the regex
> pattern).
> But the regex could not represent the right behaviour, and I also didn't
> test it.
>
> Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
> VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
>
> On 18 February 2013 18:36, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > A brief look made me think [\d] was still allowed, but I also didn't play
> > with it to actually find out.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
> > <mc...@apache.org>wrote:
> >
> > > There is a good chance that this notation went away after S2-009 (
> > > http://goo.gl/NydYr), though I could be wrong .
> > >
> > > Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> > > G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> > > Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
> > > VisualizeMe:
> http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara
> > >
> > > Maurizio Cucchiara
> > >
> > >
> > > On 18 February 2013 18:14, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The [0].foo notation should allow direct access to the nth item on
> the
> > > > stack.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not aware of it intentionally going away, but I also don't use it
> > > > regularly and would need to check.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Lukasz Lenart <
> > lukaszlenart@apache.org
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 2013/2/18 Chris Mawata <ch...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > I am using Struts 2.3.4.1 and i noticed the notation
> > > > > > [n].parameterName to get a parameter of a given name
> > > > > > when the first ocurrance is not the one you want is
> > > > > > not working. I can't find any documentation that it was
> > > > > > removed. Can anyone point me to something? I might
> > > > > > not be searching by the technically correct name.
> > > > >
> > > > > I cannot recall such a notation, you can use #attr.parameterName to
> > > > > search throughout the ValueStack
> > > > >
> > > > > http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/ognl.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > --
> > > > > Łukasz
> > > > > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > e: davelnewton@gmail.com
> > > > m: 908-380-8699
> > > > s: davelnewton_skype
> > > > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
> > > > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
> > > > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
> > > > so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > e: davelnewton@gmail.com
> > m: 908-380-8699
> > s: davelnewton_skype
> > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
> > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
> > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
> > so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
> >
>
--
e: davelnewton@gmail.com
m: 908-380-8699
s: davelnewton_skype
t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?
Posted by Maurizio Cucchiara <mc...@apache.org>.
Looking at the regex on the bottom of the page, I'd say: it's no more
allowed (http://goo.gl/oUlb6 click on the green button to test the regex
pattern).
But the regex could not represent the right behaviour, and I also didn't
test it.
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 18 February 2013 18:36, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A brief look made me think [\d] was still allowed, but I also didn't play
> with it to actually find out.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
> <mc...@apache.org>wrote:
>
> > There is a good chance that this notation went away after S2-009 (
> > http://goo.gl/NydYr), though I could be wrong .
> >
> > Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> > G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> > Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
> > VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara
> >
> > Maurizio Cucchiara
> >
> >
> > On 18 February 2013 18:14, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The [0].foo notation should allow direct access to the nth item on the
> > > stack.
> > >
> > > I'm not aware of it intentionally going away, but I also don't use it
> > > regularly and would need to check.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Lukasz Lenart <
> lukaszlenart@apache.org
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2013/2/18 Chris Mawata <ch...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > I am using Struts 2.3.4.1 and i noticed the notation
> > > > > [n].parameterName to get a parameter of a given name
> > > > > when the first ocurrance is not the one you want is
> > > > > not working. I can't find any documentation that it was
> > > > > removed. Can anyone point me to something? I might
> > > > > not be searching by the technically correct name.
> > > >
> > > > I cannot recall such a notation, you can use #attr.parameterName to
> > > > search throughout the ValueStack
> > > >
> > > > http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/ognl.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > --
> > > > Łukasz
> > > > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > e: davelnewton@gmail.com
> > > m: 908-380-8699
> > > s: davelnewton_skype
> > > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
> > > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
> > > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
> > > so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> e: davelnewton@gmail.com
> m: 908-380-8699
> s: davelnewton_skype
> t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
> b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
> g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
> so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
>
Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?
Posted by Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com>.
A brief look made me think [\d] was still allowed, but I also didn't play
with it to actually find out.
Dave
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
<mc...@apache.org>wrote:
> There is a good chance that this notation went away after S2-009 (
> http://goo.gl/NydYr), though I could be wrong .
>
> Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
> VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
>
> On 18 February 2013 18:14, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The [0].foo notation should allow direct access to the nth item on the
> > stack.
> >
> > I'm not aware of it intentionally going away, but I also don't use it
> > regularly and would need to check.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlenart@apache.org
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > 2013/2/18 Chris Mawata <ch...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > I am using Struts 2.3.4.1 and i noticed the notation
> > > > [n].parameterName to get a parameter of a given name
> > > > when the first ocurrance is not the one you want is
> > > > not working. I can't find any documentation that it was
> > > > removed. Can anyone point me to something? I might
> > > > not be searching by the technically correct name.
> > >
> > > I cannot recall such a notation, you can use #attr.parameterName to
> > > search throughout the ValueStack
> > >
> > > http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/ognl.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > --
> > > Łukasz
> > > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > e: davelnewton@gmail.com
> > m: 908-380-8699
> > s: davelnewton_skype
> > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
> > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
> > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
> > so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
> >
>
--
e: davelnewton@gmail.com
m: 908-380-8699
s: davelnewton_skype
t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?
Posted by Maurizio Cucchiara <mc...@apache.org>.
There is a good chance that this notation went away after S2-009 (
http://goo.gl/NydYr), though I could be wrong .
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 18 February 2013 18:14, Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The [0].foo notation should allow direct access to the nth item on the
> stack.
>
> I'm not aware of it intentionally going away, but I also don't use it
> regularly and would need to check.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlenart@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > 2013/2/18 Chris Mawata <ch...@gmail.com>:
> > > Hi all,
> > > I am using Struts 2.3.4.1 and i noticed the notation
> > > [n].parameterName to get a parameter of a given name
> > > when the first ocurrance is not the one you want is
> > > not working. I can't find any documentation that it was
> > > removed. Can anyone point me to something? I might
> > > not be searching by the technically correct name.
> >
> > I cannot recall such a notation, you can use #attr.parameterName to
> > search throughout the ValueStack
> >
> > http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/ognl.html
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Łukasz
> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> e: davelnewton@gmail.com
> m: 908-380-8699
> s: davelnewton_skype
> t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
> b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
> g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
> so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
>
Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?
Posted by Dave Newton <da...@gmail.com>.
The [0].foo notation should allow direct access to the nth item on the
stack.
I'm not aware of it intentionally going away, but I also don't use it
regularly and would need to check.
Dave
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Lukasz Lenart <lu...@apache.org>wrote:
> 2013/2/18 Chris Mawata <ch...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi all,
> > I am using Struts 2.3.4.1 and i noticed the notation
> > [n].parameterName to get a parameter of a given name
> > when the first ocurrance is not the one you want is
> > not working. I can't find any documentation that it was
> > removed. Can anyone point me to something? I might
> > not be searching by the technically correct name.
>
> I cannot recall such a notation, you can use #attr.parameterName to
> search throughout the ValueStack
>
> http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/ognl.html
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
e: davelnewton@gmail.com
m: 908-380-8699
s: davelnewton_skype
t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
Re: valueStack [n].parameterName -- is it still there?
Posted by Lukasz Lenart <lu...@apache.org>.
2013/2/18 Chris Mawata <ch...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
> I am using Struts 2.3.4.1 and i noticed the notation
> [n].parameterName to get a parameter of a given name
> when the first ocurrance is not the one you want is
> not working. I can't find any documentation that it was
> removed. Can anyone point me to something? I might
> not be searching by the technically correct name.
I cannot recall such a notation, you can use #attr.parameterName to
search throughout the ValueStack
http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/ognl.html
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org