[ANN] notice of upcoming vote for M1

[Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>]

I think that we have worked through the issues found for M1. The only 
item that I know
of is the addition of the svn commands that Cliff posted today as 
follow-up to go and get
the MINA snapshot which is a nice touch I think we should add. (Thanks 
to all those that
helped in some way)

Aside from that, if you see anything on M1 speak up now... if there are 
no issues raised
then I think we can begin a vote thread for M1 Tuesday the 28th, 
(tomorrow) I will do so
sometime latter in the day, unless Rajith wants to do that :-)

Regards
Carl.

Re: [ANN] notice of upcoming vote for M1

[Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>]

Paul,

I have added this disclaimer to the notices file.

Carl.


Paul Fremantle wrote:
> I've looked at the issue of you guys shipping with JMS. In general it
> is not good to ship Java Platform Interface (java.* javax.*)
> interfaces without passing the relevant TCK. However, as long as you
> label this release correctly, we should be ok.
>
> So please include clear documentation that this release does not pass
> the TCK tests and that the JMS support is "alpha" or "beta" and not
> compliant with the JMS spec.
>
> Paul
>
> On 11/27/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think that we have worked through the issues found for M1. The only
>> item that I know
>> of is the addition of the svn commands that Cliff posted today as
>> follow-up to go and get
>> the MINA snapshot which is a nice touch I think we should add. (Thanks
>> to all those that
>> helped in some way)
>>
>> Aside from that, if you see anything on M1 speak up now... if there are
>> no issues raised
>> then I think we can begin a vote thread for M1 Tuesday the 28th,
>> (tomorrow) I will do so
>> sometime latter in the day, unless Rajith wants to do that :-)
>>
>> Regards
>> Carl.
>>
>
>

Re: [ANN] notice of upcoming vote for M1

[Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>]

I've looked at the issue of you guys shipping with JMS. In general it
is not good to ship Java Platform Interface (java.* javax.*)
interfaces without passing the relevant TCK. However, as long as you
label this release correctly, we should be ok.

So please include clear documentation that this release does not pass
the TCK tests and that the JMS support is "alpha" or "beta" and not
compliant with the JMS spec.

Paul

On 11/27/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I think that we have worked through the issues found for M1. The only
> item that I know
> of is the addition of the svn commands that Cliff posted today as
> follow-up to go and get
> the MINA snapshot which is a nice touch I think we should add. (Thanks
> to all those that
> helped in some way)
>
> Aside from that, if you see anything on M1 speak up now... if there are
> no issues raised
> then I think we can begin a vote thread for M1 Tuesday the 28th,
> (tomorrow) I will do so
> sometime latter in the day, unless Rajith wants to do that :-)
>
> Regards
> Carl.
>


-- 
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

Re: [ANN] notice of upcoming vote for M1

[Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>]

I guess we should just finally check that we've been able to get the broker
running successfully (and connect to it with a client) on every platfrom:

Windows
Linux
Unix

I'll start checking now (have had it up wth previous RCs but will recheck) -
please post if you've been able to do this ok already ?

Thanks,
Marnie


On 11/27/06, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> thank you all for helping to make the release a sucess.
>
> >>sometime latter in the day, unless Rajith wants to do that :-)
> Carl , be my guest , your are most welcomed to do so :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
> On 11/27/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think that we have worked through the issues found for M1. The only
> > item that I know
> > of is the addition of the svn commands that Cliff posted today as
> > follow-up to go and get
> > the MINA snapshot which is a nice touch I think we should add. (Thanks
> > to all those that
> > helped in some way)
> >
> > Aside from that, if you see anything on M1 speak up now... if there are
> > no issues raised
> > then I think we can begin a vote thread for M1 Tuesday the 28th,
> > (tomorrow) I will do so
> > sometime latter in the day, unless Rajith wants to do that :-)
> >
> > Regards
> > Carl.
> >
>
>

Re: [ANN] notice of upcoming vote for M1

[Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>]

thank you all for helping to make the release a sucess.

>>sometime latter in the day, unless Rajith wants to do that :-)
Carl , be my guest , your are most welcomed to do so :)

Regards,

Rajith

On 11/27/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> I think that we have worked through the issues found for M1. The only
> item that I know
> of is the addition of the svn commands that Cliff posted today as
> follow-up to go and get
> the MINA snapshot which is a nice touch I think we should add. (Thanks
> to all those that
> helped in some way)
>
> Aside from that, if you see anything on M1 speak up now... if there are
> no issues raised
> then I think we can begin a vote thread for M1 Tuesday the 28th,
> (tomorrow) I will do so
> sometime latter in the day, unless Rajith wants to do that :-)
>
> Regards
> Carl.
>