You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com> on 2012/05/09 12:11:37 UTC

Re: [VOTE] Apache Nutch 1.5 release rc #1

Hi Chris

Any chance you could do a RC2 for the trunk soonish? We've been a bit stuck
since mid April and it would be nice to move on. If not I can try and spin
a RC myself but it is likely to be hilarious :-)

Re-Maven : I am not against moving to Maven at all : it would make it
easier to publish the artefacts + nice integration with Eclipse + most devs
familiar with it etc... not sure about the best way to deal with the
plugins though - treat them as modules? any thoughts on this?

Thanks

Julien

On 19 April 2012 14:51, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

> Hey Julien thanks for the help below. I will try running some of the ant
> tasks
> (sorry I'm a Maven wonk ;) ) and get this working hopefully this week. I
> have
> a big proposal deadline on Friday but should come up for air after that
> heading into the weekend and get this done.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 3:56 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
>
> > Hi Chris
> >
> >
> > >
> > > -1 the versions of the deps for hadoop, tika and possibly others are
> not correct in the pom.xml found in the src archive and on the mvn
> repository, which will be a problem for whoever tries to use the pom.xml
> file e.g. in Eclipse or more annoyingly declare Nutch as a dependency with
> Ivy / Maven. Did you regenerate the pom file from the ivy one?
> >
> > I didn't regenerate it -- but will try and do so for RC #2.
> >
> > Should have been done automatically when calling 'ant deploy' - if not
> might be that the maven task jar is missing from lib
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I remember that we mentioned delivering the content of runtime/local
> in the binary archive instead of having the sources + runtime/deploy as
> well.
> > [..snip...]
> > >  I don't think it would take much time to do that, so what about doing
> it now? We could rename the archive into apache-nutch-1.5-local-bin maybe
> to make the content clearer.
> >
> > +1 to the above, but I think we can just have it be apache-nutch-1.5-bin
> -- no need to rename it to local. We can just
> > reference this ML thread for documentation in the future.
> >
> >
> > I've committed in trunk revision 1327896 a new ant task which will
> generate a binary package as described above. You'll probably need to
> modify the code for the tar / zip as well but this should give you a
> starting point
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > --
> >
> > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
> >
> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
> >
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>


-- 
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering

http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble

Re: [VOTE] Apache Nutch 1.5 release rc #1

Posted by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>.
Hi Everyone,

Is there anything I can do to help along the trunk RC? We all
mentioned a couple of areas for improvement just before we got stuck.
This weekend I am happy to stick in some time to get it moving again!

Lewis

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
<ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hey Julien,
>
> On May 9, 2012, at 3:11 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris
>>
>> Any chance you could do a RC2 for the trunk soonish? We've been a bit stuck since mid April and it would be nice to move on. If not I can try and spin a RC myself but it is likely to be hilarious :-)
>
> Haha, no worries. I will try and get one going for this weekend. And I'm sure you'd do fine! :)
>
>>
>> Re-Maven : I am not against moving to Maven at all : it would make it easier to publish the artefacts + nice integration with Eclipse + most devs familiar with it etc... not sure about the best way to deal with the plugins though - treat them as modules? any thoughts on this?
>
> Yeah this is something I would definitely like to explore for 1.6+ -- I think we could just do Maven pom.xml files for each plugin and then do a multi-aggregator core
> project that built core first, then all the plugins post facto.
>
> I will file an issue to explore this for 1.6.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>



-- 
Lewis

Re: [VOTE] Apache Nutch 1.5 release rc #1

Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hey Julien,

On May 9, 2012, at 3:11 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:

> Hi Chris
> 
> Any chance you could do a RC2 for the trunk soonish? We've been a bit stuck since mid April and it would be nice to move on. If not I can try and spin a RC myself but it is likely to be hilarious :-)

Haha, no worries. I will try and get one going for this weekend. And I'm sure you'd do fine! :)

> 
> Re-Maven : I am not against moving to Maven at all : it would make it easier to publish the artefacts + nice integration with Eclipse + most devs familiar with it etc... not sure about the best way to deal with the plugins though - treat them as modules? any thoughts on this?

Yeah this is something I would definitely like to explore for 1.6+ -- I think we could just do Maven pom.xml files for each plugin and then do a multi-aggregator core
project that built core first, then all the plugins post facto. 

I will file an issue to explore this for 1.6.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Chris

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++