You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> on 2008/02/29 14:45:37 UTC
Ongoing Aegis cleanup
Hearing no feedback, I studied the Aegis Configuration object further. I
concluded that it is, in fact, a good modular container of the type creation
options, with an unhelpful name.
So, next commit will rename it to TypeCreationOptions, preserving the old
name as an @deprecated subclass.
I've also been added javadoc.
The Confluence doc will need work; I still wonder if we should fork all of
confluence for 2.1 before we get more hopelessly confused pages containing
mixtures of 2.0.x and 2.1 doc.
Re: Ongoing Aegis cleanup
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
+1 for forking the confluence for 2.1.
Willem
Benson Margulies wrote:
> Hearing no feedback, I studied the Aegis Configuration object further. I
> concluded that it is, in fact, a good modular container of the type creation
> options, with an unhelpful name.
>
> So, next commit will rename it to TypeCreationOptions, preserving the old
> name as an @deprecated subclass.
>
> I've also been added javadoc.
>
> The Confluence doc will need work; I still wonder if we should fork all of
> confluence for 2.1 before we get more hopelessly confused pages containing
> mixtures of 2.0.x and 2.1 doc.
>
>
Re: Ongoing Aegis cleanup
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Friday 29 February 2008, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Salut Guillaume,
>
> I believe we still hope to release 2.1 with a week or so.
Uhh... not quite. I'm targetting end of March. Definitely still time
to get bugs fixed and things cleaned up.
That said, PLEASE start using the snapshots if possible. The more
people banging on it, the better.
Dan
> I would
> recommend using 2.1 snapshots if you want to do anything complex with
> Aegis. 2.0.xworks, but
> 2.1 has a revamped configuration architecture and I, for one, can
> provide much better support.
>
> --benson
>
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:56 AM, tog <gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Hi Benson,
> >
> > I am using aegis and am wondering when is due 2.1. Is the current
> > 2.1 snapshot the version you would recommend for testing the new
> > aegis module ?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Guillaume
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Benson Margulies
> > <bi...@gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hearing no feedback, I studied the Aegis Configuration object
> > > further. I concluded that it is, in fact, a good modular container
> > > of the type
> >
> > creation
> >
> > > options, with an unhelpful name.
> > >
> > > So, next commit will rename it to TypeCreationOptions, preserving
> > > the
> >
> > old
> >
> > > name as an @deprecated subclass.
> > >
> > > I've also been added javadoc.
> > >
> > > The Confluence doc will need work; I still wonder if we should
> > > fork all
> >
> > of
> >
> > > confluence for 2.1 before we get more hopelessly confused pages
> >
> > containing
> >
> > > mixtures of 2.0.x and 2.1 doc.
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Guillaume
> > PGP KeyID:C1A0A73F FingerPrint:A4A2 73C0 E7D4 6437 8185 D05E ECF2
> > AD84 C1A0 A73F
> > http://cheztog.blogspot.com
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: Ongoing Aegis cleanup
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Salut Guillaume,
I believe we still hope to release 2.1 with a week or so. I would recommend
using 2.1 snapshots if you want to do anything complex with Aegis.
2.0.xworks, but
2.1 has a revamped configuration architecture and I, for one, can provide
much better support.
--benson
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:56 AM, tog <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> I am using aegis and am wondering when is due 2.1. Is the current 2.1
> snapshot the version you would recommend for testing the new aegis
> module ?
>
> Cheers
> Guillaume
>
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hearing no feedback, I studied the Aegis Configuration object further. I
> > concluded that it is, in fact, a good modular container of the type
> creation
> > options, with an unhelpful name.
> >
> > So, next commit will rename it to TypeCreationOptions, preserving the
> old
> > name as an @deprecated subclass.
> >
> > I've also been added javadoc.
> >
> > The Confluence doc will need work; I still wonder if we should fork all
> of
> > confluence for 2.1 before we get more hopelessly confused pages
> containing
> > mixtures of 2.0.x and 2.1 doc.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Guillaume
> PGP KeyID:C1A0A73F FingerPrint:A4A2 73C0 E7D4 6437 8185 D05E ECF2
> AD84 C1A0 A73F
> http://cheztog.blogspot.com
>
Re: Ongoing Aegis cleanup
Posted by tog <gu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Benson,
I am using aegis and am wondering when is due 2.1. Is the current 2.1
snapshot the version you would recommend for testing the new aegis
module ?
Cheers
Guillaume
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hearing no feedback, I studied the Aegis Configuration object further. I
> concluded that it is, in fact, a good modular container of the type creation
> options, with an unhelpful name.
>
> So, next commit will rename it to TypeCreationOptions, preserving the old
> name as an @deprecated subclass.
>
> I've also been added javadoc.
>
> The Confluence doc will need work; I still wonder if we should fork all of
> confluence for 2.1 before we get more hopelessly confused pages containing
> mixtures of 2.0.x and 2.1 doc.
>
--
Best Regards
Guillaume
PGP KeyID:C1A0A73F FingerPrint:A4A2 73C0 E7D4 6437 8185 D05E ECF2
AD84 C1A0 A73F
http://cheztog.blogspot.com