You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2010/07/31 23:21:57 UTC
[VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?
I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
developer releases?
Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In
particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
definitely not for production deploys.
We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
code has gone in.
Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
Thanks,
St.Ack
1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Vote passes. Thanks to all who voted. I'll put up the release later today.
St.Ack
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I ran this release on 15 nodes and used Import to pull in some data,
> the performance was great and all went well.
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> Ran the rc on my five node test cluster against CDH3b2 with a YCSB load over
>> night, inserted 500GB. Shut down and restarted the cluster to test
>> assignment at startup. Looks good. +1
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm +1
>>>
>>> I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate
>>> and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it
>>> basically worked.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
>>> > testing I did today leads me to +1.
>>> >
>>> > J-D
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Some notes, no vote yet:
>>> >>
>>> >> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
>>> >> link is wrong.
>>> >>
>>> >> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
>>> >> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
>>> >> why it's missing.
>>> >>
>>> >> J-D
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> >>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
>>> >>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
>>> >>> here:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
>>> >>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
>>> >>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
>>> >>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
>>> >>> developer releases?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
>>> >>> about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In
>>> >>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
>>> >>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
>>> >>> release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
>>> >>> definitely not for production deploys.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
>>> >>> code has gone in.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks,
>>> >>> St.Ack
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
I ran this release on 15 nodes and used Import to pull in some data,
the performance was great and all went well.
+1
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Ran the rc on my five node test cluster against CDH3b2 with a YCSB load over
> night, inserted 500GB. Shut down and restarted the cluster to test
> assignment at startup. Looks good. +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm +1
>>
>> I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate
>> and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it
>> basically worked.
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
>> > testing I did today leads me to +1.
>> >
>> > J-D
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> Some notes, no vote yet:
>> >>
>> >> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
>> >> link is wrong.
>> >>
>> >> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
>> >> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
>> >> why it's missing.
>> >>
>> >> J-D
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> >>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
>> >>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
>> >>> here:
>> >>>
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>> >>>
>> >>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>> >>>
>> >>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
>> >>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
>> >>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
>> >>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>> >>>
>> >>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
>> >>> developer releases?
>> >>>
>> >>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
>> >>> about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In
>> >>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
>> >>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
>> >>> release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
>> >>> definitely not for production deploys.
>> >>>
>> >>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
>> >>> code has gone in.
>> >>>
>> >>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> St.Ack
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
Ran the rc on my five node test cluster against CDH3b2 with a YCSB load over
night, inserted 500GB. Shut down and restarted the cluster to test
assignment at startup. Looks good. +1
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I'm +1
>
> I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate
> and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it
> basically worked.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
> > testing I did today leads me to +1.
> >
> > J-D
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Some notes, no vote yet:
> >>
> >> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
> >> link is wrong.
> >>
> >> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
> >> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
> >> why it's missing.
> >>
> >> J-D
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
> >>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
> >>> here:
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
> >>>
> >>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
> >>>
> >>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
> >>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
> >>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
> >>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
> >>>
> >>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
> >>> developer releases?
> >>>
> >>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
> >>> about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In
> >>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
> >>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
> >>> release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
> >>> definitely not for production deploys.
> >>>
> >>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
> >>> code has gone in.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> St.Ack
> >>>
> >>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
I'm +1
I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate
and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it
basically worked.
St.Ack
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
> testing I did today leads me to +1.
>
> J-D
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Some notes, no vote yet:
>>
>> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
>> link is wrong.
>>
>> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
>> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
>> why it's missing.
>>
>> J-D
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
>>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
>>> here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>>>
>>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>>>
>>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
>>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
>>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
>>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>>>
>>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
>>> developer releases?
>>>
>>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
>>> about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In
>>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
>>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
>>> release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
>>> definitely not for production deploys.
>>>
>>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
>>> code has gone in.
>>>
>>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
testing I did today leads me to +1.
J-D
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Some notes, no vote yet:
>
> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
> link is wrong.
>
> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
> why it's missing.
>
> J-D
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
>> here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>>
>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>>
>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>>
>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
>> developer releases?
>>
>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
>> about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In
>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
>> release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
>> definitely not for production deploys.
>>
>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
>> code has gone in.
>>
>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010726 rc2?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
Some notes, no vote yet:
- The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
link is wrong.
- HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack
is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain
why it's missing.
J-D
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the
> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available
> here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/
>
> You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/
>
> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80
> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for
> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See
> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list.
>
> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of
> developer releases?
>
> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information
> about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In
> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate
> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major
> release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its
> definitely not for production deploys.
>
> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master
> code has gone in.
>
> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions
>