You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> on 2007/01/21 21:26:43 UTC
dispatcher going STAX
Hi all,
I have on my hard drive a very basic working version of a standalone
dispatcher based on stax.
Can I commit it to /trunk/tools/dispatcher?
I changed some things to get rid of legacy naming and would explain
after I have commited.
I really just put some final hours to make it work but did not spend
much time to make it more general (there may be still some hard coded
links). I just think this would be good to add so more people can have a
look on it (Ross may have some proposals to make it forrest2
supportable).
wdyt?
salu2
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
Re: dispatcher going STAX
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:07 +0000, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 08:21 -0500, Tim Williams wrote:
>>>> On 1/21/07, Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have on my hard drive a very basic working version of a standalone
>>>>> dispatcher based on stax.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can I commit it to /trunk/tools/dispatcher?
>>>>>
>>>>> I changed some things to get rid of legacy naming and would explain
>>>>> after I have commited.
>>>>>
>>>>> I really just put some final hours to make it work but did not spend
>>>>> much time to make it more general (there may be still some hard coded
>>>>> links). I just think this would be good to add so more people can have a
>>>>> look on it (Ross may have some proposals to make it forrest2
>>>>> supportable).
>>>>>
>>>>> wdyt?
>>>> Not sure why the /trunk/tools/dispatcher location,
>> +1 for whiteboard. I'd like to play with this in conjunction with my
>> Forrest2 experiments (not sure when though).
>
> I just saw your commits on the stax dispatcher (thanks), so I guess you
> had a go.
>
> wdyt?
I like it. It will marry very well with what I am doing on the Forrest2
experiments. I'm eager to see more functionality, but did not want to
say so when we still have to get 0.8 finished ;-)
Ross
Re: dispatcher going STAX
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:07 +0000, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 08:21 -0500, Tim Williams wrote:
> >> On 1/21/07, Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I have on my hard drive a very basic working version of a standalone
> >>> dispatcher based on stax.
> >>>
> >>> Can I commit it to /trunk/tools/dispatcher?
> >>>
> >>> I changed some things to get rid of legacy naming and would explain
> >>> after I have commited.
> >>>
> >>> I really just put some final hours to make it work but did not spend
> >>> much time to make it more general (there may be still some hard coded
> >>> links). I just think this would be good to add so more people can have a
> >>> look on it (Ross may have some proposals to make it forrest2
> >>> supportable).
> >>>
> >>> wdyt?
> >> Not sure why the /trunk/tools/dispatcher location,
>
> +1 for whiteboard. I'd like to play with this in conjunction with my
> Forrest2 experiments (not sure when though).
I just saw your commits on the stax dispatcher (thanks), so I guess you
had a go.
wdyt?
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java & XML consulting, training and solutions
Re: dispatcher going STAX
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:07 +0000, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 08:21 -0500, Tim Williams wrote:
> >> On 1/21/07, Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I have on my hard drive a very basic working version of a standalone
> >>> dispatcher based on stax.
> >>>
> >>> Can I commit it to /trunk/tools/dispatcher?
> >>>
> >>> I changed some things to get rid of legacy naming and would explain
> >>> after I have commited.
> >>>
> >>> I really just put some final hours to make it work but did not spend
> >>> much time to make it more general (there may be still some hard coded
> >>> links). I just think this would be good to add so more people can have a
> >>> look on it (Ross may have some proposals to make it forrest2
> >>> supportable).
> >>>
> >>> wdyt?
> >> Not sure why the /trunk/tools/dispatcher location,
>
> +1 for whiteboard. I'd like to play with this in conjunction with my
> Forrest2 experiments (not sure when though).
whiteboard it will be.
I will add
whiteboard/dispatcher
Like said really basic so far and more a proof of concept.
salu2
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
Re: dispatcher going STAX
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 08:21 -0500, Tim Williams wrote:
>> On 1/21/07, Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have on my hard drive a very basic working version of a standalone
>>> dispatcher based on stax.
>>>
>>> Can I commit it to /trunk/tools/dispatcher?
>>>
>>> I changed some things to get rid of legacy naming and would explain
>>> after I have commited.
>>>
>>> I really just put some final hours to make it work but did not spend
>>> much time to make it more general (there may be still some hard coded
>>> links). I just think this would be good to add so more people can have a
>>> look on it (Ross may have some proposals to make it forrest2
>>> supportable).
>>>
>>> wdyt?
>> Not sure why the /trunk/tools/dispatcher location,
+1 for whiteboard. I'd like to play with this in conjunction with my
Forrest2 experiments (not sure when though).
Ross
Re: dispatcher going STAX
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 08:21 -0500, Tim Williams wrote:
> On 1/21/07, Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have on my hard drive a very basic working version of a standalone
> > dispatcher based on stax.
> >
> > Can I commit it to /trunk/tools/dispatcher?
> >
> > I changed some things to get rid of legacy naming and would explain
> > after I have commited.
> >
> > I really just put some final hours to make it work but did not spend
> > much time to make it more general (there may be still some hard coded
> > links). I just think this would be good to add so more people can have a
> > look on it (Ross may have some proposals to make it forrest2
> > supportable).
> >
> > wdyt?
>
> Not sure why the /trunk/tools/dispatcher location,
no special reason I started there to prevent confusion for myself. If
you thing whitebord/tools would be better I can commit there no problem.
> but I'm +1 on you
> commiting it.
Cheers for the feedback.
salu2
> --tim
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
Re: dispatcher going STAX
Posted by Tim Williams <wi...@gmail.com>.
On 1/21/07, Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have on my hard drive a very basic working version of a standalone
> dispatcher based on stax.
>
> Can I commit it to /trunk/tools/dispatcher?
>
> I changed some things to get rid of legacy naming and would explain
> after I have commited.
>
> I really just put some final hours to make it work but did not spend
> much time to make it more general (there may be still some hard coded
> links). I just think this would be good to add so more people can have a
> look on it (Ross may have some proposals to make it forrest2
> supportable).
>
> wdyt?
Not sure why the /trunk/tools/dispatcher location, but I'm +1 on you
commiting it.
--tim