You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2013/11/27 23:35:08 UTC
Branching 0.98
It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm thinking
about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1.
Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian army
into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer.
There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)
That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days.
Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor loading
failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book),
HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031 (Add
a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual).
There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support), HBASE-7057
(store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run
integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts with
the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513 (why
is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527
(remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given the
current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out except
HBASE-7781.
During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been done
elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC integration
testing.
Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial.
Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed security
features. I have it on good authority these will be completed this week.
Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
On Thursday, November 28, 2013, Ted Yu wrote:
> 'HBASE-4811 Support reverse scan' has gone through 28 iterations of review.
> Do you think it can make it into 0.98?
>
I see you +1ed that issue. I haven't branched trunk yet. If you are
planning to commit it this week to trunk then it will be in 0.98 when I
branch next week.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Andy:
Fix for HBASE-10005 was checked in.
Previously the test failure was observed on Linux. I will verify the fix
next week.
'HBASE-4811 Support reverse scan' has gone through 28 iterations of review.
Do you think it can make it to 0.98.0 ?
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm thinking
> about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1.
>
> Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian army
> into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer.
>
> There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)
> That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days.
>
> Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor loading
> failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book),
> HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031 (Add
> a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual).
>
> There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support), HBASE-7057
> (store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run
> integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts with
> the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513 (why
> is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527
> (remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given the
> current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out except
> HBASE-7781.
>
> During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been done
> elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC integration
> testing.
>
> Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial.
>
> Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed security
> features. I have it on good authority these will be completed this week.
> Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Thanks guys. I'll try it myself first. Some time ago I was on ASF Jenkins
and didn't seem to have it.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:11 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> You beat me to it, Stack. :)
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 7:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Branching 0.98
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
> > ...It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
> > karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
> >
> >
> I can do this Andrew (you should have same Karma as I but I've done this
> before...)
> St.Ack
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Thanks Stack!
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Andy:
> > I have pointed these two builds at branch 0.98
> > You can kick off builds directly.
> >
> >
> I deleted these and made two new ones whose provenance I know. I made a
> hbase-0.98, and a hbase-0.98-on-hadoop-1.1 in the hbase group (I just
> committed the change that sets hadoop2 as default on this branch). I made
> these use java7 too.
>
>
>
> > Stack should be able to grant you karma.
> >
>
>
> I followed instructions here: http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins Try
> it now Andy.
>
> St.Ack
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andy:
> I have pointed these two builds at branch 0.98
> You can kick off builds directly.
>
>
I deleted these and made two new ones whose provenance I know. I made a
hbase-0.98, and a hbase-0.98-on-hadoop-1.1 in the hbase group (I just
committed the change that sets hadoop2 as default on this branch). I made
these use java7 too.
> Stack should be able to grant you karma.
>
I followed instructions here: http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins Try
it now Andy.
St.Ack
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Andy:
I have pointed these two builds at branch 0.98
You can kick off builds directly.
Stack should be able to grant you karma.
Cheers
On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Alas I'm not presented with the Configure menu option either. So how does
> one to about getting Jenkins karma?
>
>
> On Friday, December 6, 2013, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for your assistance Ted!
>>
>> On Friday, December 6, 2013, Ted Yu wrote:
>>
>>> Andy:
>>> I have created the following two jobs by copying corresponding 0.96
>>> Jenkins
>>> jobs:
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.98/
>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.98-hadoop2/
>>>
>>> Feel free to configure them as you see fit.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jenkins doesn't present a 'New Job' option for me when I'm logged in
>>> with
>>>> my ASF credentials, so I'm not able to clone the 0.96 jobs for 0.98. It
>>>> would be really helpful if someone with the necessary karma could do
>>> that
>>>> for me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:11 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You beat me to it, Stack. :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>>>>> To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 7:12 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Branching 0.98
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ...It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
>>>>>> karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
>>>>> I can do this Andrew (you should have same Karma as I but I've done
>>> this
>>>>> before...)
>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> - Andy
>>>>
>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>> (via Tom White)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Alas I'm not presented with the Configure menu option either. So how does
one to about getting Jenkins karma?
On Friday, December 6, 2013, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Thank you very much for your assistance Ted!
>
> On Friday, December 6, 2013, Ted Yu wrote:
>
>> Andy:
>> I have created the following two jobs by copying corresponding 0.96
>> Jenkins
>> jobs:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.98/
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.98-hadoop2/
>>
>> Feel free to configure them as you see fit.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Jenkins doesn't present a 'New Job' option for me when I'm logged in
>> with
>> > my ASF credentials, so I'm not able to clone the 0.96 jobs for 0.98. It
>> > would be really helpful if someone with the necessary karma could do
>> that
>> > for me.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:11 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > You beat me to it, Stack. :)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ________________________________
>> > > From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>> > > To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 7:12 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: Branching 0.98
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > ...It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
>> > > > karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > I can do this Andrew (you should have same Karma as I but I've done
>> this
>> > > before...)
>> > > St.Ack
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > - Andy
>> >
>> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> > (via Tom White)
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Thank you very much for your assistance Ted!
On Friday, December 6, 2013, Ted Yu wrote:
> Andy:
> I have created the following two jobs by copying corresponding 0.96 Jenkins
> jobs:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.98/
> https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.98-hadoop2/
>
> Feel free to configure them as you see fit.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Jenkins doesn't present a 'New Job' option for me when I'm logged in with
> > my ASF credentials, so I'm not able to clone the 0.96 jobs for 0.98. It
> > would be really helpful if someone with the necessary karma could do that
> > for me.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:11 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > You beat me to it, Stack. :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Stack <stack@duboce.net <javascript:;>>
> > > To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 7:12 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Branching 0.98
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org<javascript:;>
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > ...It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
> > > > karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I can do this Andrew (you should have same Karma as I but I've done
> this
> > > before...)
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Andy:
I have created the following two jobs by copying corresponding 0.96 Jenkins
jobs:
https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.98/
https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.98-hadoop2/
Feel free to configure them as you see fit.
Cheers
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Jenkins doesn't present a 'New Job' option for me when I'm logged in with
> my ASF credentials, so I'm not able to clone the 0.96 jobs for 0.98. It
> would be really helpful if someone with the necessary karma could do that
> for me.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:11 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > You beat me to it, Stack. :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 7:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: Branching 0.98
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > > ...It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
> > > karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
> > >
> > >
> > I can do this Andrew (you should have same Karma as I but I've done this
> > before...)
> > St.Ack
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Jenkins doesn't present a 'New Job' option for me when I'm logged in with
my ASF credentials, so I'm not able to clone the 0.96 jobs for 0.98. It
would be really helpful if someone with the necessary karma could do that
for me.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:11 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> You beat me to it, Stack. :)
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 7:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Branching 0.98
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
> > ...It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
> > karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
> >
> >
> I can do this Andrew (you should have same Karma as I but I've done this
> before...)
> St.Ack
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>.
You beat me to it, Stack. :)
________________________________
From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: Branching 0.98
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
> karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
>
>
I can do this Andrew (you should have same Karma as I but I've done this
before...)
St.Ack
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
> karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
>
>
I can do this Andrew (you should have same Karma as I but I've done this
before...)
St.Ack
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
I will do it now.
JM
2013/12/4 Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
> Do you mind creating a release tag for 99 in jira?
>
> Thanks,
> Enis
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I've branched for 0.98. Trunk now builds as 0.99.0-SNAPSHOT. The new
> branch
> > 0.98 builds as 0.98.0-SNAPSHOT. Checked the Git mirror, the new branch
> and
> > POM updates have already made it over. Looks good.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > As you've probably noticed I've been holding as some last minute
> details
> > > come in. However I am going to make the branch today. I will just do
> the
> > > svn copy some time in the afternoon here, so that will be overnight in
> > the
> > > Pacific timezone. It would be tremendously helpful if someone with
> > Jenkins
> > > karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thursday, November 28, 2013, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > >
> > >> It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm
> > >> thinking about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1.
> > >>
> > >> Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian
> > >> army into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer.
> > >>
> > >> There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version:
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)
> > >> That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days.
> > >>
> > >> Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor
> loading
> > >> failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book),
> > >> HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031
> > (Add
> > >> a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual).
> > >>
> > >> There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support),
> HBASE-7057
> > >> (store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run
> > >> integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts
> > with
> > >> the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513
> > (why
> > >> is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527
> > >> (remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given
> the
> > >> current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out
> > except
> > >> HBASE-7781.
> > >>
> > >> During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been
> done
> > >> elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC
> integration
> > >> testing.
> > >>
> > >> Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial.
> > >>
> > >> Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed
> > >> security features. I have it on good authority these will be completed
> > this
> > >> week. Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>
> > >> - Andy
> > >>
> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > >> (via Tom White)
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>.
Do you mind creating a release tag for 99 in jira?
Thanks,
Enis
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've branched for 0.98. Trunk now builds as 0.99.0-SNAPSHOT. The new branch
> 0.98 builds as 0.98.0-SNAPSHOT. Checked the Git mirror, the new branch and
> POM updates have already made it over. Looks good.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > As you've probably noticed I've been holding as some last minute details
> > come in. However I am going to make the branch today. I will just do the
> > svn copy some time in the afternoon here, so that will be overnight in
> the
> > Pacific timezone. It would be tremendously helpful if someone with
> Jenkins
> > karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, November 28, 2013, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> >
> >> It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm
> >> thinking about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1.
> >>
> >> Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian
> >> army into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer.
> >>
> >> There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)
> >> That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days.
> >>
> >> Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor loading
> >> failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book),
> >> HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031
> (Add
> >> a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual).
> >>
> >> There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support), HBASE-7057
> >> (store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run
> >> integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts
> with
> >> the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513
> (why
> >> is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527
> >> (remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given the
> >> current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out
> except
> >> HBASE-7781.
> >>
> >> During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been done
> >> elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC integration
> >> testing.
> >>
> >> Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial.
> >>
> >> Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed
> >> security features. I have it on good authority these will be completed
> this
> >> week. Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> - Andy
> >>
> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> >> (via Tom White)
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
I've branched for 0.98. Trunk now builds as 0.99.0-SNAPSHOT. The new branch
0.98 builds as 0.98.0-SNAPSHOT. Checked the Git mirror, the new branch and
POM updates have already made it over. Looks good.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> As you've probably noticed I've been holding as some last minute details
> come in. However I am going to make the branch today. I will just do the
> svn copy some time in the afternoon here, so that will be overnight in the
> Pacific timezone. It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
> karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
>
>
> On Thursday, November 28, 2013, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
>> It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm
>> thinking about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1.
>>
>> Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian
>> army into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer.
>>
>> There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)
>> That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days.
>>
>> Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor loading
>> failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book),
>> HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031 (Add
>> a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual).
>>
>> There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support), HBASE-7057
>> (store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run
>> integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts with
>> the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513 (why
>> is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527
>> (remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given the
>> current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out except
>> HBASE-7781.
>>
>> During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been done
>> elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC integration
>> testing.
>>
>> Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial.
>>
>> Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed
>> security features. I have it on good authority these will be completed this
>> week. Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branching 0.98
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
As you've probably noticed I've been holding as some last minute details
come in. However I am going to make the branch today. I will just do the
svn copy some time in the afternoon here, so that will be overnight in the
Pacific timezone. It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
On Thursday, November 28, 2013, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm thinking
> about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1.
>
> Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian
> army into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer.
>
> There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)
> That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days.
>
> Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor loading
> failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book),
> HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031 (Add
> a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual).
>
> There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support), HBASE-7057
> (store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run
> integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts with
> the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513 (why
> is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527
> (remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given the
> current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out except
> HBASE-7781.
>
> During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been done
> elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC integration
> testing.
>
> Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial.
>
> Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed security
> features. I have it on good authority these will be completed this week.
> Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)