You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@qpid.apache.org by NimbusParc <ni...@yahoo.in> on 2013/10/01 07:47:21 UTC
Re: QPID AMQP Performance test
Which version of QPID you are using while testing ?
In the recent version of QPID-0.24, the --tcp-nodelay became Yes by default.
If you are using previous versions, you need to pass this argument to get
better performance.
amitg90 wrote
> Hi All,
>
> i am new to QPID, after downloading the software from website, i used the
> sample example code (recv.c and send.c) and modified on send side to
> continuouly send 64 bytes packets from machine A and on recevie side on
> machine B grabbing the packet and checking how much packets i received per
> sec and i am not able to see more than 18000 packets per sec (throughput
> 10Mbps).
>
> being a 1Gbps link between two machines i was hoping for more throughput
> coming out of it..
>
> i ran standard TCP performance test and it get close to 800Mbps
> throughput.
>
> can someone please suggest if there is something obvious that i am missing
> or there exist some performance script which help me understand what is
> causing low throughput..
>
> i can provide more details if that helps..
>
> thanks
> amit
--
View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/QPID-AMQP-Performance-test-tp7598833p7598848.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
RE: QPID AMQP Performance test
Posted by Am...@Dell.com.
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
Thanks Everyone for quick response..
I am trying the suggestion I got so far from everyone, will send my finding to the group to get the feedback..
Thanks
amit
-----Original Message-----
From: NimbusParc [mailto:nimbusparc@yahoo.in]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 3:41 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: QPID AMQP Performance test
Gordon Sim wrote
> On 10/01/2013 06:47 AM, NimbusParc wrote:
>> Which version of QPID you are using while testing ?
>> In the recent version of QPID-0.24, the --tcp-nodelay became Yes by
>> default.
>> If you are using previous versions, you need to pass this argument
>> to get better performance.
>
> Just for clarification, I suspect (given the executable names) that
> the question was referring to proton messenger which is on its own
> release cycle (0.5 being the latest) and where there is no tcp-nodelay option.
Oh.. When answering to this question, i am just doing the same performance test for my C++ broker.
At that time by seeing this question, i know this is about proton messenger but i don't know why i answered for the C++ broker. It was totally due to my deep involvement in testing the C++ broker.
Excuse me and What you answered above is very good with clear explanation.
Gordon Sim wrote
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@.apache
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@.apache
--
View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/QPID-AMQP-Performance-test-tp7598833p7598855.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: QPID AMQP Performance test
Posted by NimbusParc <ni...@yahoo.in>.
Gordon Sim wrote
> On 10/01/2013 06:47 AM, NimbusParc wrote:
>> Which version of QPID you are using while testing ?
>> In the recent version of QPID-0.24, the --tcp-nodelay became Yes by
>> default.
>> If you are using previous versions, you need to pass this argument to
>> get
>> better performance.
>
> Just for clarification, I suspect (given the executable names) that the
> question was referring to proton messenger which is on its own release
> cycle (0.5 being the latest) and where there is no tcp-nodelay option.
Oh.. When answering to this question, i am just doing the same performance
test for my C++ broker.
At that time by seeing this question, i know this is about proton messenger
but i don't know why i
answered for the C++ broker. It was totally due to my deep involvement in
testing the C++ broker.
Excuse me and What you answered above is very good with clear explanation.
Gordon Sim wrote
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@.apache
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@.apache
--
View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/QPID-AMQP-Performance-test-tp7598833p7598855.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: QPID AMQP Performance test
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On 10/01/2013 06:47 AM, NimbusParc wrote:
> Which version of QPID you are using while testing ?
> In the recent version of QPID-0.24, the --tcp-nodelay became Yes by default.
> If you are using previous versions, you need to pass this argument to get
> better performance.
Just for clarification, I suspect (given the executable names) that the
question was referring to proton messenger which is on its own release
cycle (0.5 being the latest) and where there is no tcp-nodelay option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org