You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> on 2023/02/10 09:33:02 UTC
TomEE 10.x .... changing approach
Hi all,
I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x. It's
getting too big to get reviewed and it looks like a big bang operation
which is not desired. For TomEE 9.x we had to somehow do it, but then it
took months to bring the build back to green and the TCK fully green as
well.
For TomEE 10, we can avoid that and move in parallel with baby steps
without breaking the build for a very long time.
Long story short, I have reopened all PRs merged into that big PR and I'll
ask everyone to check them out, build them and make sure they are green
before they are merged.
I'll proceed the same way myself by pulling from the big PR some changes
and create smaller PRs that I can test and get into a green state.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
Re: TomEE 10.x .... changing approach
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
Hi Thomas,
Please see below some comments.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 4:30 PM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> JFYI:
> my colleague implemented the Johnzon polymorphism feature and he will try
> to get all TCK tests running
>
I reviewed with Romain and we merged. I need to run the entire TCK again
and I'll trigger a release asap if it passes.
>
> So whats left:
> - Johnzon: wait and run release
> - BVal: run release
>
Discussed with Mark as well in a separate thread. We should do a release.
I'm happy to do it as well.
> - CXF: 4.0 is already released? So just integration missing?
>
Yes, but integration is tricky and the upgrade will take a bit of time. The
trick is that they don't care about TCK so I don't know where we are.
> - OWB: ?
>
Mark started. We have a few challenges created and accepted. We have other
things to fix in order to pass the TCK.
> - BatchEE: ?
>
Mark also started on this one, but I'm not sure about the current status. I
think the upgrade broke a lot of APIs. Some modules will be pruned as well.
> - OpenJPA: no commits, also OpenJPA doesnt implement all 2.2 features.
>
Mark or Romain, do you have any update on this one?
I must say I have no idea.
> Shouldnt we just replace it with EclipseLink as default?
>
>
> Am So., 2. Apr. 2023 um 17:19 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
>
> > Johnzon is already transitioned to Jakarta. The TCK is already set up. Si
> > go ahead if you have some time. Il at DevNexus this week but I can
> > definitely trigger a release for bval.
> >
> > Le dim. 2 avr. 2023, 11:11, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> > >
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > I can try to help on implemeting johnzon stuff.
> > >
> > > MyFaces is done, yup. We even pass the TCK the first time since ever
> > > propably.
> > >
> > > bval: maybe you can trigger a release?
> > >
> > > About OpenJPA: i dont think the work has been started. Propably we
> should
> > > just switch to Eclipse-Link.
> > >
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am So., 2. Apr.
> > > 2023, 16:51:
> > >
> > > > I have been doing some other things and haven't been able to move
> > > forward.
> > > >
> > > > CDI is not too far, but we have some disagreement with the spec and
> the
> > > TCK
> > > > which are heavily tight to Weld. So it takes time to test, argue and
> > get
> > > > challenges accepted so we can then work with the spec.
> > > >
> > > > BVal is close or compliant.
> > > > BatchEE, Mark started and I think a lot of things were not compiling.
> > And
> > > > some modules can't get updated because there is no jakarta
> equivalent.
> > > > MyFaces should be done
> > > >
> > > > OpenJPA, I'm not sure about the gap
> > > > CXF is close to having a 4.x available but it requires some
> integration
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > Johnzon is close, but missing the inheritance/polymorphism part to
> > > > implement. It's a gap but the rest has been implemented already.
> > > >
> > > > On top of my head, this is where we are.
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 3:03 PM Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Don't know the current status.
> > > > >
> > > > > JL filled some challenges for CDI. As far as I can remember, there
> > are
> > > > > still some things to do for CDI (?) and Johnzon (?).
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't know the status of BatchEE, though.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gruß
> > > > > Richard
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 30.03.2023 um 22:21 +0200 schrieb Thomas
> > Andraschko:
> > > > > > Is there any further progress?
> > > > > > Are there depedencies still not ready?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently im spending time in porting DeltaSpike to EE10.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am Fr.,
> 10.
> > > > > > Feb.
> > > > > > 2023, 10:33:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x.
> > > > > > > It's
> > > > > > > getting too big to get reviewed and it looks like a big bang
> > > > > > > operation
> > > > > > > which is not desired. For TomEE 9.x we had to somehow do it,
> but
> > > > > > > then it
> > > > > > > took months to bring the build back to green and the TCK fully
> > > > > > > green as
> > > > > > > well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For TomEE 10, we can avoid that and move in parallel with baby
> > > > > > > steps
> > > > > > > without breaking the build for a very long time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Long story short, I have reopened all PRs merged into that big
> PR
> > > > > > > and I'll
> > > > > > > ask everyone to check them out, build them and make sure they
> are
> > > > > > > green
> > > > > > > before they are merged.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll proceed the same way myself by pulling from the big PR
> some
> > > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > and create smaller PRs that I can test and get into a green
> > state.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: TomEE 10.x .... changing approach
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
JFYI:
my colleague implemented the Johnzon polymorphism feature and he will try
to get all TCK tests running
So whats left:
- Johnzon: wait and run release
- BVal: run release
- CXF: 4.0 is already released? So just integration missing?
- OWB: ?
- BatchEE: ?
- OpenJPA: no commits, also OpenJPA doesnt implement all 2.2 features.
Shouldnt we just replace it with EclipseLink as default?
Am So., 2. Apr. 2023 um 17:19 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> Johnzon is already transitioned to Jakarta. The TCK is already set up. Si
> go ahead if you have some time. Il at DevNexus this week but I can
> definitely trigger a release for bval.
>
> Le dim. 2 avr. 2023, 11:11, Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> >
> a écrit :
>
> > I can try to help on implemeting johnzon stuff.
> >
> > MyFaces is done, yup. We even pass the TCK the first time since ever
> > propably.
> >
> > bval: maybe you can trigger a release?
> >
> > About OpenJPA: i dont think the work has been started. Propably we should
> > just switch to Eclipse-Link.
> >
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am So., 2. Apr.
> > 2023, 16:51:
> >
> > > I have been doing some other things and haven't been able to move
> > forward.
> > >
> > > CDI is not too far, but we have some disagreement with the spec and the
> > TCK
> > > which are heavily tight to Weld. So it takes time to test, argue and
> get
> > > challenges accepted so we can then work with the spec.
> > >
> > > BVal is close or compliant.
> > > BatchEE, Mark started and I think a lot of things were not compiling.
> And
> > > some modules can't get updated because there is no jakarta equivalent.
> > > MyFaces should be done
> > >
> > > OpenJPA, I'm not sure about the gap
> > > CXF is close to having a 4.x available but it requires some integration
> > > time.
> > >
> > > Johnzon is close, but missing the inheritance/polymorphism part to
> > > implement. It's a gap but the rest has been implemented already.
> > >
> > > On top of my head, this is where we are.
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 3:03 PM Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Don't know the current status.
> > > >
> > > > JL filled some challenges for CDI. As far as I can remember, there
> are
> > > > still some things to do for CDI (?) and Johnzon (?).
> > > >
> > > > Don't know the status of BatchEE, though.
> > > >
> > > > Gruß
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 30.03.2023 um 22:21 +0200 schrieb Thomas
> Andraschko:
> > > > > Is there any further progress?
> > > > > Are there depedencies still not ready?
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently im spending time in porting DeltaSpike to EE10.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am Fr., 10.
> > > > > Feb.
> > > > > 2023, 10:33:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x.
> > > > > > It's
> > > > > > getting too big to get reviewed and it looks like a big bang
> > > > > > operation
> > > > > > which is not desired. For TomEE 9.x we had to somehow do it, but
> > > > > > then it
> > > > > > took months to bring the build back to green and the TCK fully
> > > > > > green as
> > > > > > well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For TomEE 10, we can avoid that and move in parallel with baby
> > > > > > steps
> > > > > > without breaking the build for a very long time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Long story short, I have reopened all PRs merged into that big PR
> > > > > > and I'll
> > > > > > ask everyone to check them out, build them and make sure they are
> > > > > > green
> > > > > > before they are merged.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll proceed the same way myself by pulling from the big PR some
> > > > > > changes
> > > > > > and create smaller PRs that I can test and get into a green
> state.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: TomEE 10.x .... changing approach
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
Johnzon is already transitioned to Jakarta. The TCK is already set up. Si
go ahead if you have some time. Il at DevNexus this week but I can
definitely trigger a release for bval.
Le dim. 2 avr. 2023, 11:11, Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
a écrit :
> I can try to help on implemeting johnzon stuff.
>
> MyFaces is done, yup. We even pass the TCK the first time since ever
> propably.
>
> bval: maybe you can trigger a release?
>
> About OpenJPA: i dont think the work has been started. Propably we should
> just switch to Eclipse-Link.
>
> Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am So., 2. Apr.
> 2023, 16:51:
>
> > I have been doing some other things and haven't been able to move
> forward.
> >
> > CDI is not too far, but we have some disagreement with the spec and the
> TCK
> > which are heavily tight to Weld. So it takes time to test, argue and get
> > challenges accepted so we can then work with the spec.
> >
> > BVal is close or compliant.
> > BatchEE, Mark started and I think a lot of things were not compiling. And
> > some modules can't get updated because there is no jakarta equivalent.
> > MyFaces should be done
> >
> > OpenJPA, I'm not sure about the gap
> > CXF is close to having a 4.x available but it requires some integration
> > time.
> >
> > Johnzon is close, but missing the inheritance/polymorphism part to
> > implement. It's a gap but the rest has been implemented already.
> >
> > On top of my head, this is where we are.
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 3:03 PM Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Don't know the current status.
> > >
> > > JL filled some challenges for CDI. As far as I can remember, there are
> > > still some things to do for CDI (?) and Johnzon (?).
> > >
> > > Don't know the status of BatchEE, though.
> > >
> > > Gruß
> > > Richard
> > >
> > > Am Donnerstag, dem 30.03.2023 um 22:21 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> > > > Is there any further progress?
> > > > Are there depedencies still not ready?
> > > >
> > > > Currently im spending time in porting DeltaSpike to EE10.
> > > >
> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am Fr., 10.
> > > > Feb.
> > > > 2023, 10:33:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x.
> > > > > It's
> > > > > getting too big to get reviewed and it looks like a big bang
> > > > > operation
> > > > > which is not desired. For TomEE 9.x we had to somehow do it, but
> > > > > then it
> > > > > took months to bring the build back to green and the TCK fully
> > > > > green as
> > > > > well.
> > > > >
> > > > > For TomEE 10, we can avoid that and move in parallel with baby
> > > > > steps
> > > > > without breaking the build for a very long time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Long story short, I have reopened all PRs merged into that big PR
> > > > > and I'll
> > > > > ask everyone to check them out, build them and make sure they are
> > > > > green
> > > > > before they are merged.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll proceed the same way myself by pulling from the big PR some
> > > > > changes
> > > > > and create smaller PRs that I can test and get into a green state.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: TomEE 10.x .... changing approach
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
I can try to help on implemeting johnzon stuff.
MyFaces is done, yup. We even pass the TCK the first time since ever
propably.
bval: maybe you can trigger a release?
About OpenJPA: i dont think the work has been started. Propably we should
just switch to Eclipse-Link.
Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am So., 2. Apr.
2023, 16:51:
> I have been doing some other things and haven't been able to move forward.
>
> CDI is not too far, but we have some disagreement with the spec and the TCK
> which are heavily tight to Weld. So it takes time to test, argue and get
> challenges accepted so we can then work with the spec.
>
> BVal is close or compliant.
> BatchEE, Mark started and I think a lot of things were not compiling. And
> some modules can't get updated because there is no jakarta equivalent.
> MyFaces should be done
>
> OpenJPA, I'm not sure about the gap
> CXF is close to having a 4.x available but it requires some integration
> time.
>
> Johnzon is close, but missing the inheritance/polymorphism part to
> implement. It's a gap but the rest has been implemented already.
>
> On top of my head, this is where we are.
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 3:03 PM Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Don't know the current status.
> >
> > JL filled some challenges for CDI. As far as I can remember, there are
> > still some things to do for CDI (?) and Johnzon (?).
> >
> > Don't know the status of BatchEE, though.
> >
> > Gruß
> > Richard
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 30.03.2023 um 22:21 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> > > Is there any further progress?
> > > Are there depedencies still not ready?
> > >
> > > Currently im spending time in porting DeltaSpike to EE10.
> > >
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am Fr., 10.
> > > Feb.
> > > 2023, 10:33:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x.
> > > > It's
> > > > getting too big to get reviewed and it looks like a big bang
> > > > operation
> > > > which is not desired. For TomEE 9.x we had to somehow do it, but
> > > > then it
> > > > took months to bring the build back to green and the TCK fully
> > > > green as
> > > > well.
> > > >
> > > > For TomEE 10, we can avoid that and move in parallel with baby
> > > > steps
> > > > without breaking the build for a very long time.
> > > >
> > > > Long story short, I have reopened all PRs merged into that big PR
> > > > and I'll
> > > > ask everyone to check them out, build them and make sure they are
> > > > green
> > > > before they are merged.
> > > >
> > > > I'll proceed the same way myself by pulling from the big PR some
> > > > changes
> > > > and create smaller PRs that I can test and get into a green state.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >
> >
> >
>
Re: TomEE 10.x .... changing approach
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
I have been doing some other things and haven't been able to move forward.
CDI is not too far, but we have some disagreement with the spec and the TCK
which are heavily tight to Weld. So it takes time to test, argue and get
challenges accepted so we can then work with the spec.
BVal is close or compliant.
BatchEE, Mark started and I think a lot of things were not compiling. And
some modules can't get updated because there is no jakarta equivalent.
MyFaces should be done
OpenJPA, I'm not sure about the gap
CXF is close to having a 4.x available but it requires some integration
time.
Johnzon is close, but missing the inheritance/polymorphism part to
implement. It's a gap but the rest has been implemented already.
On top of my head, this is where we are.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 3:03 PM Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org> wrote:
> Don't know the current status.
>
> JL filled some challenges for CDI. As far as I can remember, there are
> still some things to do for CDI (?) and Johnzon (?).
>
> Don't know the status of BatchEE, though.
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
> Am Donnerstag, dem 30.03.2023 um 22:21 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> > Is there any further progress?
> > Are there depedencies still not ready?
> >
> > Currently im spending time in porting DeltaSpike to EE10.
> >
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am Fr., 10.
> > Feb.
> > 2023, 10:33:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x.
> > > It's
> > > getting too big to get reviewed and it looks like a big bang
> > > operation
> > > which is not desired. For TomEE 9.x we had to somehow do it, but
> > > then it
> > > took months to bring the build back to green and the TCK fully
> > > green as
> > > well.
> > >
> > > For TomEE 10, we can avoid that and move in parallel with baby
> > > steps
> > > without breaking the build for a very long time.
> > >
> > > Long story short, I have reopened all PRs merged into that big PR
> > > and I'll
> > > ask everyone to check them out, build them and make sure they are
> > > green
> > > before they are merged.
> > >
> > > I'll proceed the same way myself by pulling from the big PR some
> > > changes
> > > and create smaller PRs that I can test and get into a green state.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
>
>
Re: TomEE 10.x .... changing approach
Posted by Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>.
Don't know the current status.
JL filled some challenges for CDI. As far as I can remember, there are
still some things to do for CDI (?) and Johnzon (?).
Don't know the status of BatchEE, though.
Gruß
Richard
Am Donnerstag, dem 30.03.2023 um 22:21 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> Is there any further progress?
> Are there depedencies still not ready?
>
> Currently im spending time in porting DeltaSpike to EE10.
>
> Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am Fr., 10.
> Feb.
> 2023, 10:33:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x.
> > It's
> > getting too big to get reviewed and it looks like a big bang
> > operation
> > which is not desired. For TomEE 9.x we had to somehow do it, but
> > then it
> > took months to bring the build back to green and the TCK fully
> > green as
> > well.
> >
> > For TomEE 10, we can avoid that and move in parallel with baby
> > steps
> > without breaking the build for a very long time.
> >
> > Long story short, I have reopened all PRs merged into that big PR
> > and I'll
> > ask everyone to check them out, build them and make sure they are
> > green
> > before they are merged.
> >
> > I'll proceed the same way myself by pulling from the big PR some
> > changes
> > and create smaller PRs that I can test and get into a green state.
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
Re: TomEE 10.x .... changing approach
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Is there any further progress?
Are there depedencies still not ready?
Currently im spending time in porting DeltaSpike to EE10.
Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am Fr., 10. Feb.
2023, 10:33:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x. It's
> getting too big to get reviewed and it looks like a big bang operation
> which is not desired. For TomEE 9.x we had to somehow do it, but then it
> took months to bring the build back to green and the TCK fully green as
> well.
>
> For TomEE 10, we can avoid that and move in parallel with baby steps
> without breaking the build for a very long time.
>
> Long story short, I have reopened all PRs merged into that big PR and I'll
> ask everyone to check them out, build them and make sure they are green
> before they are merged.
>
> I'll proceed the same way myself by pulling from the big PR some changes
> and create smaller PRs that I can test and get into a green state.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>