[GitHub] spark issue #19354: [SPARK-20992][Scheduler] Add links in documentation to N...

[barnardb <gi...@git.apache.org>]

Github user barnardb commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19354
  
    I totally understand the reluctance to have non-ASF projects in a list headed by "The system currently supports…". Looking at the [Powered By](https://spark.apache.org/powered-by.html) page, it doesn't look like the best way to help users find third-party cluster integrations. The [Spark Packages](https://spark-packages.org) site @srowen mentions seems a slightly better fit, but I don't think it would occur to me that I could look there for cluster manager integrations. Would it be appropriate to remove the Kubernetes and Nomad items from the list of supported cluster managers, and instead follow the list with a short line that links to these integrations but makes their unsupported status clear? Something like:
    
    > Third-party projects (not supported by the Spark project) exist to add support for [Kubernetes](https://github.com/apache-spark-on-k8s/) and [Nomad](https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad-spark) as cluster managers.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org