You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org> on 2017/01/03 18:58:00 UTC
CC-SA 4.0
The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to ask about
Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been previously
approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and able to be
included in an Apache release?
Thanks.
[1]:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
[2]:
https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/version4/
Re: CC-SA 4.0
Posted by Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org>.
It's CC-SA 4.0 and it sounds like the system will not currently operate without it. If it's not bundled tests will fail and when you start up the application that uses it, it will go an download it. The plan is to change that and make it optional and non-bundled, but it's not a simple change and the podling is trying to make a release.
Thanks.
On 2017-01-21 12:21 (-0700), Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> Which CC license?
>
> How is it used in the project? (required, optional, merged with Apache
> licensed data, independent file etc)?
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > We decided just to dump it. It didn't seem worth the effort for what
> > little it did for us.
> >
> > That being said, we got a question about another piece of CC licensed
> > content. It's the MaxMind DB GeoLite2 Database. So it's not code, but it's
> > not exactly an image, video, or sound file either. Honestly, to me it seems
> > like this is something better left to the end user to download, but if we
> > can at least bundle it until we are able to make that change that would be
> > very helpful.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On 2017-01-12 22:46 (-0700), Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Yup - we should either remove or contact the author to see if we can
> > > encourage them to move to a Creative Commons (Public Domain), MIT or
> > Apache
> > > license.
> > >
> > > Given all they say 'an Creative Commons license'; one approach to that
> > > question could be to ask if they intend the CC-0 to be one of those
> > > available licenses.
> > >
> > > That said, given it's 9 year code, may be simpler to dump it.
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, sorry, I was not on list. Turns out it *is* code.
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/
> > > > master/traffic_ops/app/public/js/percentagebar.js
> > > >
> > > > So it sounds like this is not allowed? Not even sure why they licensed
> > it
> > > > that way in the first place.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > On 2017-01-11 22:19 (-0700), Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > If it fits (bar the version number):
> > > > >
> > > > > "Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike
> > 2.5
> > > > > <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> and Creative
> > Commons
> > > > > Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/
> > > > licenses/by-sa/3.0/>
> > > > > licenses may be included in Apache products, subject to the licenses
> > > > > attribution clauses which may require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes.
> > For
> > > > > any other type of CC-SA licensed work, please contact the Legal PMC."
> > > > >
> > > > > Then it's fine. Media is intended to mean not-source-code. i.e. an
> > image,
> > > > > video or sound file. It should be clearly marked for users that the
> > > > license
> > > > > is present in the Apache product, and where. Otherwise, no to using
> > > > > software/content under that license. If the latter seems too harsh,
> > > > provide
> > > > > more details (per Shane's reply, but I realize you may not have been
> > on
> > > > > list).
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll update resolved.html to include the 4.0 version.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Shane Curcuru <asf@shanecurcuru.org
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Phil Sorber wrote on 1/3/17 1:58 PM:
> > > > > > > The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to
> > ask
> > > > about
> > > > > > > Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been
> > previously
> > > > > > > approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and
> > able
> > > > to be
> > > > > > > included in an Apache release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could you provide a description and reference to some of the files
> > the
> > > > > > podling wants to include with CC-SA 4.0? It's important *how*
> > they fit
> > > > > > into the product to be able to work on a reply.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7
> > > > > > f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > [2]:
> > > > > > > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-
> > > > > > considerations/version4/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Shane
> > > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: CC-SA 4.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
Which CC license?
How is it used in the project? (required, optional, merged with Apache
licensed data, independent file etc)?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org> wrote:
> We decided just to dump it. It didn't seem worth the effort for what
> little it did for us.
>
> That being said, we got a question about another piece of CC licensed
> content. It's the MaxMind DB GeoLite2 Database. So it's not code, but it's
> not exactly an image, video, or sound file either. Honestly, to me it seems
> like this is something better left to the end user to download, but if we
> can at least bundle it until we are able to make that change that would be
> very helpful.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 2017-01-12 22:46 (-0700), Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Yup - we should either remove or contact the author to see if we can
> > encourage them to move to a Creative Commons (Public Domain), MIT or
> Apache
> > license.
> >
> > Given all they say 'an Creative Commons license'; one approach to that
> > question could be to ask if they intend the CC-0 to be one of those
> > available licenses.
> >
> > That said, given it's 9 year code, may be simpler to dump it.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, sorry, I was not on list. Turns out it *is* code.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/
> > > master/traffic_ops/app/public/js/percentagebar.js
> > >
> > > So it sounds like this is not allowed? Not even sure why they licensed
> it
> > > that way in the first place.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On 2017-01-11 22:19 (-0700), Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > If it fits (bar the version number):
> > > >
> > > > "Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike
> 2.5
> > > > <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> and Creative
> Commons
> > > > Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/
> > > licenses/by-sa/3.0/>
> > > > licenses may be included in Apache products, subject to the licenses
> > > > attribution clauses which may require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes.
> For
> > > > any other type of CC-SA licensed work, please contact the Legal PMC."
> > > >
> > > > Then it's fine. Media is intended to mean not-source-code. i.e. an
> image,
> > > > video or sound file. It should be clearly marked for users that the
> > > license
> > > > is present in the Apache product, and where. Otherwise, no to using
> > > > software/content under that license. If the latter seems too harsh,
> > > provide
> > > > more details (per Shane's reply, but I realize you may not have been
> on
> > > > list).
> > > >
> > > > I'll update resolved.html to include the 4.0 version.
> > > >
> > > > Hen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Shane Curcuru <asf@shanecurcuru.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Phil Sorber wrote on 1/3/17 1:58 PM:
> > > > > > The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to
> ask
> > > about
> > > > > > Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been
> previously
> > > > > > approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and
> able
> > > to be
> > > > > > included in an Apache release?
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you provide a description and reference to some of the files
> the
> > > > > podling wants to include with CC-SA 4.0? It's important *how*
> they fit
> > > > > into the product to be able to work on a reply.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7
> > > > > f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > [2]:
> > > > > > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-
> > > > > considerations/version4/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > - Shane
> > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
Re: CC-SA 4.0
Posted by Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org>.
We decided just to dump it. It didn't seem worth the effort for what little it did for us.
That being said, we got a question about another piece of CC licensed content. It's the MaxMind DB GeoLite2 Database. So it's not code, but it's not exactly an image, video, or sound file either. Honestly, to me it seems like this is something better left to the end user to download, but if we can at least bundle it until we are able to make that change that would be very helpful.
Thanks.
On 2017-01-12 22:46 (-0700), Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yup - we should either remove or contact the author to see if we can
> encourage them to move to a Creative Commons (Public Domain), MIT or Apache
> license.
>
> Given all they say 'an Creative Commons license'; one approach to that
> question could be to ask if they intend the CC-0 to be one of those
> available licenses.
>
> That said, given it's 9 year code, may be simpler to dump it.
>
> Hen
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Yes, sorry, I was not on list. Turns out it *is* code.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/
> > master/traffic_ops/app/public/js/percentagebar.js
> >
> > So it sounds like this is not allowed? Not even sure why they licensed it
> > that way in the first place.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On 2017-01-11 22:19 (-0700), Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > If it fits (bar the version number):
> > >
> > > "Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5
> > > <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> and Creative Commons
> > > Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/
> > licenses/by-sa/3.0/>
> > > licenses may be included in Apache products, subject to the licenses
> > > attribution clauses which may require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. For
> > > any other type of CC-SA licensed work, please contact the Legal PMC."
> > >
> > > Then it's fine. Media is intended to mean not-source-code. i.e. an image,
> > > video or sound file. It should be clearly marked for users that the
> > license
> > > is present in the Apache product, and where. Otherwise, no to using
> > > software/content under that license. If the latter seems too harsh,
> > provide
> > > more details (per Shane's reply, but I realize you may not have been on
> > > list).
> > >
> > > I'll update resolved.html to include the 4.0 version.
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Phil Sorber wrote on 1/3/17 1:58 PM:
> > > > > The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to ask
> > about
> > > > > Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been previously
> > > > > approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and able
> > to be
> > > > > included in an Apache release?
> > > >
> > > > Could you provide a description and reference to some of the files the
> > > > podling wants to include with CC-SA 4.0? It's important *how* they fit
> > > > into the product to be able to work on a reply.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]:
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7
> > > > f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > > [2]:
> > > > > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-
> > > > considerations/version4/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > - Shane
> > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: CC-SA 4.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
Yup - we should either remove or contact the author to see if we can
encourage them to move to a Creative Commons (Public Domain), MIT or Apache
license.
Given all they say 'an Creative Commons license'; one approach to that
question could be to ask if they intend the CC-0 to be one of those
available licenses.
That said, given it's 9 year code, may be simpler to dump it.
Hen
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, sorry, I was not on list. Turns out it *is* code.
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/
> master/traffic_ops/app/public/js/percentagebar.js
>
> So it sounds like this is not allowed? Not even sure why they licensed it
> that way in the first place.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 2017-01-11 22:19 (-0700), Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> > If it fits (bar the version number):
> >
> > "Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5
> > <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> and Creative Commons
> > Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/
> licenses/by-sa/3.0/>
> > licenses may be included in Apache products, subject to the licenses
> > attribution clauses which may require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. For
> > any other type of CC-SA licensed work, please contact the Legal PMC."
> >
> > Then it's fine. Media is intended to mean not-source-code. i.e. an image,
> > video or sound file. It should be clearly marked for users that the
> license
> > is present in the Apache product, and where. Otherwise, no to using
> > software/content under that license. If the latter seems too harsh,
> provide
> > more details (per Shane's reply, but I realize you may not have been on
> > list).
> >
> > I'll update resolved.html to include the 4.0 version.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Phil Sorber wrote on 1/3/17 1:58 PM:
> > > > The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to ask
> about
> > > > Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been previously
> > > > approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and able
> to be
> > > > included in an Apache release?
> > >
> > > Could you provide a description and reference to some of the files the
> > > podling wants to include with CC-SA 4.0? It's important *how* they fit
> > > into the product to be able to work on a reply.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > [1]:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7
> > > f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > [2]:
> > > > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-
> > > considerations/version4/
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > - Shane
> > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
Re: CC-SA 4.0
Posted by Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org>.
Yes, sorry, I was not on list. Turns out it *is* code.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/master/traffic_ops/app/public/js/percentagebar.js
So it sounds like this is not allowed? Not even sure why they licensed it that way in the first place.
Thanks.
On 2017-01-11 22:19 (-0700), Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> If it fits (bar the version number):
>
> "Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5
> <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> and Creative Commons
> Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>
> licenses may be included in Apache products, subject to the licenses
> attribution clauses which may require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. For
> any other type of CC-SA licensed work, please contact the Legal PMC."
>
> Then it's fine. Media is intended to mean not-source-code. i.e. an image,
> video or sound file. It should be clearly marked for users that the license
> is present in the Apache product, and where. Otherwise, no to using
> software/content under that license. If the latter seems too harsh, provide
> more details (per Shane's reply, but I realize you may not have been on
> list).
>
> I'll update resolved.html to include the 4.0 version.
>
> Hen
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
>
> > Phil Sorber wrote on 1/3/17 1:58 PM:
> > > The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to ask about
> > > Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been previously
> > > approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and able to be
> > > included in an Apache release?
> >
> > Could you provide a description and reference to some of the files the
> > podling wants to include with CC-SA 4.0? It's important *how* they fit
> > into the product to be able to work on a reply.
> >
> >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > [1]:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7
> > f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > [2]:
> > > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-
> > considerations/version4/
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Shane
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: CC-SA 4.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
If it fits (bar the version number):
"Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> and Creative Commons
Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>
licenses may be included in Apache products, subject to the licenses
attribution clauses which may require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. For
any other type of CC-SA licensed work, please contact the Legal PMC."
Then it's fine. Media is intended to mean not-source-code. i.e. an image,
video or sound file. It should be clearly marked for users that the license
is present in the Apache product, and where. Otherwise, no to using
software/content under that license. If the latter seems too harsh, provide
more details (per Shane's reply, but I realize you may not have been on
list).
I'll update resolved.html to include the 4.0 version.
Hen
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
> Phil Sorber wrote on 1/3/17 1:58 PM:
> > The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to ask about
> > Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been previously
> > approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and able to be
> > included in an Apache release?
>
> Could you provide a description and reference to some of the files the
> podling wants to include with CC-SA 4.0? It's important *how* they fit
> into the product to be able to work on a reply.
>
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7
> f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > [2]:
> > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-
> considerations/version4/
>
>
> --
>
> - Shane
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
Re: CC-SA 4.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
If it fits (bar the version number):
"Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> and Creative Commons
Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>
licenses may be included in Apache products, subject to the licenses
attribution clauses which may require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. For
any other type of CC-SA licensed work, please contact the Legal PMC."
Then it's fine. Media is intended to mean not-source-code. i.e. an image,
video or sound file. It should be clearly marked for users that the license
is present in the Apache product, and where. Otherwise, no to using
software/content under that license. If the latter seems too harsh, provide
more details (per Shane's reply, but I realize you may not have been on
list).
I'll update resolved.html to include the 4.0 version.
Hen
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
> Phil Sorber wrote on 1/3/17 1:58 PM:
> > The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to ask about
> > Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been previously
> > approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and able to be
> > included in an Apache release?
>
> Could you provide a description and reference to some of the files the
> podling wants to include with CC-SA 4.0? It's important *how* they fit
> into the product to be able to work on a reply.
>
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7
> f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > [2]:
> > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-
> considerations/version4/
>
>
> --
>
> - Shane
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
Re: CC-SA 4.0
Posted by Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org>.
Phil Sorber wrote on 1/3/17 1:58 PM:
> The Traffic Control (Incubating) PPMC was directed here [1] to ask about
> Creative Commons Share Alike 4.0 [2] which has not been previously
> approved. Basically, is this license compatible with ASL2 and able to be
> included in an Apache release?
Could you provide a description and reference to some of the files the
podling wants to include with CC-SA 4.0? It's important *how* they fit
into the product to be able to work on a reply.
> Thanks.
>
> [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eaf09b5e136a2a8f0cc01e54b08bb7f6de48cd838b75f3df5d350044@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> [2]:
> https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/version4/
--
- Shane
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org