You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pluto-dev@portals.apache.org by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org> on 2006/08/24 14:42:28 UTC

Gump Failures

Anyone looked into these?  Looks like it's due to dependency failures in 
1.0.  Any one aware of what's been going on in 1.0 that could have  
affected this. . .?

David

Re: Gump Failures

Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
Elliot Metsger wrote:
> David,
> 
> I looked at the Gump output a week or so ago...
> 
>>     [javac] 
>> /x1/gump/public/workspace/portals-pluto-1.0/portal/src/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/PortletFileUploadBase.java:290: 
>> cannot find symbol
>>     [javac] symbol  : constructor 
>> MultipartStream(java.io.InputStream,byte[])
>>     [javac] location: class org.apache.commons.fileupload.MultipartStream
>>     [javac]             MultipartStream multi = new 
>> MultipartStream(input, boundary);
> 
> It looks like a problem with the commons-fileupload dependency?

Pluto Portal depends on commons-fileupload 1.0.  The commons-fileupload 
trunk has removed the MultipartStream(java.io.InputStream,byte[]) 
constructor in r429098 [0].  As it stands, Pluto Portal won't be able to 
compile against commons-fileupload 1.2 when it is released.

> It isn't clear to me (because I'm not familiar with Gump) - is Gump 
> building the 1.0.1 tag or are they pulling the 1.0.2 branch? 

Per the gump metadata [1], gump is building the pluto 1.0.2 branch.  It 
also appears to be building commons-fileupload trunk.

> As far as 
> I know there's nothing that has been done in the 1.0.2 branch that would 
> cause this (but I've been wrong before)

See above.  The build fails due to a change in the commons-fileupload 
MultipartStream class.

> I can take responsibility for looking into this and figgurin' this one 
> out, seeing has how I've been the one messing around with 1.0.2 lately.

How should we handle this?  Update pluto's dependency to 
commons-fileupload 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT?  Make pluto work with both 
commons-fileupload 1.0 and 1.2?  Ignore it?

Thanks for the advice,
Elliot

[0] svn diff -r 429097:429098 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/MultipartStream.java

[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata/project/portals-pluto.xml

Re: Gump Failures

Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
David,

I looked at the Gump output a week or so ago...

>     [javac] /x1/gump/public/workspace/portals-pluto-1.0/portal/src/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/PortletFileUploadBase.java:290: cannot find symbol
>     [javac] symbol  : constructor MultipartStream(java.io.InputStream,byte[])
>     [javac] location: class org.apache.commons.fileupload.MultipartStream
>     [javac]             MultipartStream multi = new MultipartStream(input, boundary);

It looks like a problem with the commons-fileupload dependency?

It isn't clear to me (because I'm not familiar with Gump) - is Gump 
building the 1.0.1 tag or are they pulling the 1.0.2 branch?  As far as 
I know there's nothing that has been done in the 1.0.2 branch that would 
cause this (but I've been wrong before)

I can take responsibility for looking into this and figgurin' this one 
out, seeing has how I've been the one messing around with 1.0.2 lately.

Elliot

David H. DeWolf wrote:
> Anyone looked into these?  Looks like it's due to dependency failures in 
> 1.0.  Any one aware of what's been going on in 1.0 that could have  
> affected this. . .?
> 
> David