You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@edgent.apache.org by "Dale LaBossiere (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/01 22:17:25 UTC

[jira] [Created] (QUARKS-107) Add sample use of new Range class in recipe3 - detect value out of range?

Dale LaBossiere created QUARKS-107:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: Add sample use of new Range class in recipe3 - detect value out of range?
                 Key: QUARKS-107
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QUARKS-107
             Project: Quarks
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Dale LaBossiere



Add sample use of new Range class in recipe3 - detect value out of range?


Either or both of the recipe's existing samples could be use Range, or one of them could be cloned to use it.

```
TStream<Double> simpleFiltered = temp.filter(tuple ->
            tuple < TEMP_LOW || tuple > TEMP_HIGH);
// could be
TStream<Double> simpleFiltered = temp.filter(Ranges.open(TEMP_LOW, TEMP_HIGH);

TStream<Double> deadbandFiltered = Filters.deadband(temp,
            identity(), tuple -> tuple >= TEMP_LOW && tuple <= TEMP_HIGH);
// could instead be
TStream<Double> deadbandFiltered = Filters.deadband(temp,
            identity(), Ranges.closed(TEMP_LOW, TEMP_HIGH));
```

Use of a Range simplifies the code a bit.  I can also avoid mistakes if one's code "duplicates" the expressions for a particular range in multiple places.  

Using Range can be more compelling for the simplicity with which a range may be expressed and created from a config file for an app.  e.g. imagine how one would express the range in a Properties config file.  A range property value in a Properties file would simply be:
```
# my sensor filter range
myFilterRange=[71.0..98.0]
```
and the app code to create the Range would simply be:
```
Range<Double> myFilterRange = Ranges.valueOfDouble(props.getProperty("myFilterRange"));
```

Another compelling case is making a filter range dynamically changeable, for example as a result of some received IoT "device command".  The range could be declared like:
```
AtomicReference<Range<Double>> myFilterRange = new AtomicReference<>(
    Ranges.valueOfDouble(props.getProperty("myFilterRange"));  // initial range value

// code in the device's set-filter-range cmd handler is ultimately:
//   myFilterRange.set(Ranges.valueOfDouble(the-new-range-string-from-the-cmd));  // sets a new Range object

// Using the changeable filter range is simply:
TStream<Double> simpleFiltered = temp.filter(myFilterRange.get());
```

Dynamic filter Predicates is probably a good recipe unto itself :-)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)