You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by "Remko Popma (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/02/11 11:55:19 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-531) Rolled log files overwritten by RollingFile appender with composite time and size based policies

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Remko Popma closed LOG4J2-531.
------------------------------


Geoff, If you don't mind, I would like to close this issue (seeing that the title/description issue of data loss has been resolved). If you disagree, please feel free to re-open this issue.

I've started a new ticket (LOG4J2-535) for the new issue you found. I've tentatively called it "Rolled log files end up in the wrong directory" and used your last comment as the issue description, but please feel free to edit the title, description and anything else as you see fit.

Best regards, -Remko

> Rolled log files overwritten by RollingFile appender with composite time and size based policies
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-531
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-531
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Appenders
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-beta9
>         Environment: Ubuntu 12.04 and 13.04, java version "1.7.0_51"
>            Reporter: Geoff Ballinger
>            Assignee: Remko Popma
>             Fix For: 2.0-rc1
>
>
> We have a system which generates high volume logs which are required to be preserved for audit purposes, and have been having problems with files being unexpectedly overwritten.
> We are using a RollingFile appender with day granularity, time based and size based triggering policies, and a rollover strategy with a suitably large max value.
> I have created a simple test case with minute granularity to quickly illustrate the problem, which is v. similar to the example given in the documentation:
> {noformat}
> import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
> import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
> public class LogTest
> {
>     private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger("TestLogger");
>     public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
>     {
>         for (long i=0; ; i+=1) {
>             logger.debug("Sequence: " + i);
>             Thread.sleep(250);
>         }
>     }
> }
> {noformat}
> ... with a config of:
> {noformat}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <Configuration>
>     <Appenders>
>         <RollingFile name="Test" fileName="logs/test.log" filePattern="logs/test/$${date:yyyyMMddHHmm}/TEST-%d{yyyyMMddHHmm}-%i.log.gz">
>             <PatternLayout pattern="%d %p (%t) [%c] - %m%n"/>
>             <Policies>
>                 <TimeBasedTriggeringPolicy />
>                 <SizeBasedTriggeringPolicy size="1 KB"/>
>             </Policies>
>             <DefaultRolloverStrategy max="999999"/>
>         </RollingFile>
>     </Appenders>
>     <Loggers>
>         <Root level="debug">
>             <AppenderRef ref="Test"/>
>         </Root>
>     </Loggers>
> </Configuration>
> {noformat}
> If this is run as is many of the rollover logfiles have other files written over them and are lost, as can clearly be seen by the gaps in the remaining sequence numbers, and the order the sequence numbers appear in the resulting files.
> If the time based policy is removed from the config and it is re-run then all sequence numbers are correctly stored and in the expected order., Without the time based trigger some are carried over into the folder for the next period which is not ideal, though is what we are using at present to avoid data loss.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org