You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by BJ Freeman <bj...@free-man.net> on 2010/07/01 18:45:55 UTC
Re: feature category and feature configuration
data model book Vol I page 76-79.
=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
Wai Tam sent the following on 6/30/2010 8:13 AM:
>
> Hello,
>
> Any takers for this question?
>
> Thanks,
> Wai
> ----------------------
> Take for example I have the following virtual products and associated
> variants with the shown features
>
> polo shirt
> color:
> red...price $1
> green...price $2
> size:
> small...price $3
> medium...price $4
> clown shirt
> color:
> red...price $5
> green...price $6
> size:
> small...price $7
> medium...price $8
> dress pant
> color:
> red...price $9
> green...price $10
> size:
> small...price $11
> medium...price $12
>
> All of these product variants use the same similar product feature
> categories 'color' and 'size' and the features have differing pricing
> depending on what virtual product it applies to. Does that mean it is
> necessary to create separate feature categories and associated features for
> Polo shirt, Clown shirt, and dress pant as specified below?
>
> ProductFeatureCategory:
> POLOSHIRT_COLOR
> ProductFeature:
> POLOSHIRT_COLOR_RED
> POLOSHIRT_COLOR_GREEN
> POLOSHIRT_SIZE_SMALL
> POLOSHIRT_SIZE_MEDIUM
>
> ProductFeatureCategory:
> CLOWNSHIRT_COLOR
> ProductFeature:
> CLOWNSHIRT_COLOR_RED
> CLOWNSHIRT_COLOR_GREEN
> CLOWNSHIRT_SIZE_SMALL
> CLOWNSHIRT_SIZE_MEDIUM
>
> ProductFeatureCategory:
> DRESSPANT_COLOR
> ProductFeature:
> DRESSPANT_COLOR_RED
> DRESSPANT_COLOR_GREEN
> DRESSPANT_SIZE_SMALL
> DRESSPANT_SIZE_MEDIUM
>
> If the above configuration is correct, does that imply that in practice,
> features and feature categories easily grow to be very large and difficult
> to manage?
>
> Thanks
> Wai