You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Felix Meschberger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/10/19 16:42:50 UTC
[jira] Closed: (SLING-64) Refactor Servlets and Script resolution
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Felix Meschberger closed SLING-64.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Felix Meschberger
Changes have been applied. Closing this issue for now.
> Refactor Servlets and Script resolution
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-64
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-64
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: microsling
> Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Assignee: Felix Meschberger
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: SLING-64.patch
>
>
> microsling currently defines a SlingServlet interface which has a canProcess method used to decide whether a servlet is capable of handling a request or not. I think, this mechanism will not scale well if we add more script engines or more servlets.
> As a first step towards a simpler approach, I propose the following:
> * Merge the DefaultSlingServlet and the SlingPostServlet to a single DefaultSlingServlet
> * Replace Rhino and Velocity servlets by respective ScriptEngines (and define the interface for that)
> * Refactor the SlingScriptResolver such that after resolving the script, it is also evaluated through a ScriptEngine
> * Refactor MicroSlingServlet such, that
> (1) check for a servlet by resource type
> (2) try to evaluate a script
> (3) fall back to the DefaultSlingServlet
> * Also in the MicroSlingServlet register servlets by type (currently there are none of course)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.