You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/05/24 01:46:22 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow-rs] kazuk opened a new issue, #1733: prebuilt binary package for release.

kazuk opened a new issue, #1733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1733

   **Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.**
   A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...] 
   (This section helps Arrow developers understand the context and *why* for this feature, in addition to  the *what*)
   
   Parquet-rs provides CLI tool. but install requires Rust.
   
   **Describe the solution you'd like**
   A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
   
   - provide prebuilt package for debian, we can use [cargo-deb](https://crates.io/crates/cargo-deb).
   - provide prebuilt package for rpm, we can use [cargo-rpm](https://crates.io/crates/cargo-rpm).
   
   but `cargo-rpm` seems no maintainer.
   
   **Describe alternatives you've considered**
   A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
   
   **Additional context**
   Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [arrow-rs] tustvold commented on issue #1733: prebuilt binary package for release.

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tustvold commented on issue #1733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1733#issuecomment-1137938250

   Another option might be to provide download of a statically linked binary. I don't think we should have any shared dependencies beyond glibc and so could possibly get away with sidestepping package management? 🤔
   
   I've had success using this approach for Golang projects in the past...


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org