You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xmlrpc-dev@ws.apache.org by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> on 2005/12/18 23:32:31 UTC
VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Hi,
according to the discussions in the last weeks, I propose, that we'll
cut a new release 2.0.1.
I'm going to do the work. As there haven't been any serious changes in
the last months (and because I prefer to make my life easy), I'd like
to omit rc releases or stuff like that. If anyone intervenes, I'd be
happy to vote for another release manager. :-)
Jochen
--
Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
boat. (Mark Twain)
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 12/21/05, Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW, what SVN / branch should I use to get the latest XML-RPC head (3.0 ?)
That depends on what is going to be a version 3.0. :-)
We currently do maintain a trunk branch. And I have created a branch
b20050512_streaming, which is my proposal for 3.0.
Jochen
--
Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
boat. (Mark Twain)
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>.
2005/12/21, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>:
> On 12/21/05, Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > - Did we keep the current code (2.0.2 compatible) and have the
> > 'deprecated' warning on 3.0 or did we update code to 3.0 requested
> > methods, for example using PostMethod params instead of setHttp11.
>
> The former. I'd vote -1 for larger changes in the current project
> stage. We can check such modifications in as soon as 2.0.1 is out.
> However, being a maintenance release, it is really questionable
> whether loosing downwards compatibility isn't even reserved for the
> trunk?
Ok you're right and 3.0 is backward compatible with 2.0.2 (even with
the deprecated).
And as such we should reduce users problems when they forget to switch
to http-client 2.0.2 to 3.0 when updgrading XMLRPC 2.0 to 2.0.1
Let keep hc 3.0 for next release.
BTW, what SVN / branch should I use to get the latest XML-RPC head (3.0 ?)
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 12/21/05, Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> - Did we keep the current code (2.0.2 compatible) and have the
> 'deprecated' warning on 3.0 or did we update code to 3.0 requested
> methods, for example using PostMethod params instead of setHttp11.
The former. I'd vote -1 for larger changes in the current project
stage. We can check such modifications in as soon as 2.0.1 is out.
However, being a maintenance release, it is really questionable
whether loosing downwards compatibility isn't even reserved for the
trunk?
Jochen
--
Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
boat. (Mark Twain)
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>.
I see Jochen just update the CVS to use 3.0.
Question is :
- Did we keep the current code (2.0.2 compatible) and have the
'deprecated' warning on 3.0 or did we update code to 3.0 requested
methods, for example using PostMethod params instead of setHttp11.
>2005/12/21, Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>:
> http 3.0 is out and the fixes should be small.
>
> I could take a look at this today
>
> 2005/12/20, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>:
> > then don't wory about it :) folks can do it in the field.
> >
> > On 12/20/05, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > >
> > > > Isn't it a drop-in replacement?
> > >
> > > Indeed, it is. See patches/commons-httpclient-3.0rc2.patch.
> > >
> > > Actually, this question comes up whenever we plan a release. Waiting for
> > > httpclient 3.0 could mean wait for another year, couldn't it?
> > >
> > >
> > > Jochen
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> >
>
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>.
http 3.0 is out and the fixes should be small.
I could take a look at this today
2005/12/20, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>:
> then don't wory about it :) folks can do it in the field.
>
> On 12/20/05, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > > Isn't it a drop-in replacement?
> >
> > Indeed, it is. See patches/commons-httpclient-3.0rc2.patch.
> >
> > Actually, this question comes up whenever we plan a release. Waiting for
> > httpclient 3.0 could mean wait for another year, couldn't it?
> >
> >
> > Jochen
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
then don't wory about it :) folks can do it in the field.
On 12/20/05, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > Isn't it a drop-in replacement?
>
> Indeed, it is. See patches/commons-httpclient-3.0rc2.patch.
>
> Actually, this question comes up whenever we plan a release. Waiting for
> httpclient 3.0 could mean wait for another year, couldn't it?
>
>
> Jochen
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Isn't it a drop-in replacement?
Indeed, it is. See patches/commons-httpclient-3.0rc2.patch.
Actually, this question comes up whenever we plan a release. Waiting for
httpclient 3.0 could mean wait for another year, couldn't it?
Jochen
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Isn't it a drop-in replacement?
On 12/20/05, Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should we delay 2.0.1 to make use of the newly released Commons HttpClient 3.0 ?
>
>
> 2005/12/18, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>:
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > On 12/18/05, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > according to the discussions in the last weeks, I propose, that we'll
> > > cut a new release 2.0.1.
> > > I'm going to do the work. As there haven't been any serious changes in
> > > the last months (and because I prefer to make my life easy), I'd like
> > > to omit rc releases or stuff like that. If anyone intervenes, I'd be
> > > happy to vote for another release manager. :-)
> > >
> > > Jochen
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
> > > boat. (Mark Twain)
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> >
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Jimisola Laursen <li...@jimisola.com>.
Is it worth the risk of using something that is "cutting-edge new"?
Perhaps it would be better to support/use Commons HttpClient 3.0 with the next
major release of Apache XML-RPC (e.g. when Jochen's streaming branch is
released)?
Regards,
Jimisola
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Gomez" <he...@gmail.com>
To: <xm...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Should we delay 2.0.1 to make use of the newly released Commons HttpClient 3.0 ?
2005/12/18, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>:
> +1 from me.
>
> On 12/18/05, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > according to the discussions in the last weeks, I propose, that we'll
> > cut a new release 2.0.1.
> > I'm going to do the work. As there haven't been any serious changes in
> > the last months (and because I prefer to make my life easy), I'd like
> > to omit rc releases or stuff like that. If anyone intervenes, I'd be
> > happy to vote for another release manager. :-)
> >
> > Jochen
> >
> >
> > --
> > Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
> > boat. (Mark Twain)
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>.
Should we delay 2.0.1 to make use of the newly released Commons HttpClient 3.0 ?
2005/12/18, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>:
> +1 from me.
>
> On 12/18/05, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > according to the discussions in the last weeks, I propose, that we'll
> > cut a new release 2.0.1.
> > I'm going to do the work. As there haven't been any serious changes in
> > the last months (and because I prefer to make my life easy), I'd like
> > to omit rc releases or stuff like that. If anyone intervenes, I'd be
> > happy to vote for another release manager. :-)
> >
> > Jochen
> >
> >
> > --
> > Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
> > boat. (Mark Twain)
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
Re: VOTE: Release 2.0.1
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
On 12/18/05, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to the discussions in the last weeks, I propose, that we'll
> cut a new release 2.0.1.
> I'm going to do the work. As there haven't been any serious changes in
> the last months (and because I prefer to make my life easy), I'd like
> to omit rc releases or stuff like that. If anyone intervenes, I'd be
> happy to vote for another release manager. :-)
>
> Jochen
>
>
> --
> Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
> boat. (Mark Twain)
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/