You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by drvillo <f....@gmail.com> on 2007/02/23 09:39:33 UTC
AMQ 4.2 status
Hi all
I'm about to release an alpha version of my service.
Since I had the impression that 4.2 was going to be released
soon I've been postponing the date in the hope to release
with
- a more stable version of AMQ (currently it's packaged with a month old
trunk rev.)
- kaha storing indexes on the filesystem rather than in memory
- and to get rid of this backport-util-concurrent.jar
Now I read that the jar has been tossed out, but how
about the quality of the codebase?
Thanks a lot for the feedback, and congratulations
for the progresses, I'm seeing AMQ getting better at each
checkout:)
Cheers
Francesco
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-tf3277616s2354.html#a9115227
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Spam: 5.0] AMQ 4.2 status
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 2/23/07, drvillo <f....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rob
>
> thanks for the quick reply
>
> will you announce when you branch 4.1 and 5?
Its already done
Here's 4.1...
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/branches/activemq-4.1/
here's what will be 5.0
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/trunk/
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: [Spam: 5.0] AMQ 4.2 status
Posted by drvillo <f....@gmail.com>.
Rob
thanks for the quick reply
will you announce when you branch 4.1 and 5?
Do you have any estimate of when this is likely to happen?
Cheers
Francesco
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> Given that a few things have changed in 4.2.x we'll be renaming that
> 5.0 as the OpenWire protocol will be enhanced, the code will move to
> Java 5 and other things are changing (such as dispatching, spool to
> disk stuff and so forth).
>
> So if you can wait a month or so, I'd go with 5.0, otherwise go for a
> 4.1.x release which should all be binary compatible with each other.
>
>
> On 2/23/07, drvillo <f....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob
>>
>> the service is announced here:
>>
>> http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/hostcount/hostcount++/
>>
>> background here:
>>
>> http://www.ripe.net/hostcount/
>>
>> What I'm interested mainly in a new release is the stability
>> of Kaha (I've just posted on this).
>> Java 5 would be nice to have, but it's quite more important
>> for example that interfaces don't change between 4.1 and 4.2,
>> there's no point in releasing a long running service which will
>> already have binary incompatibilities next month...
>>
>> thanks for the reply anyway, I would just like to know which
>> moves to take.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Francesco
>>
>>
>> rajdavies wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Francesco,
>> >
>> > just out interest what's the service you're releasing?
>> >
>> > We are currently debating about providing another maintenance version
>> > of the 4.1 branch, whilst continue to add enhancements in to trunk,
>> > with the aim to be the next major release to version 5.0
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> >
>> > Rob Davies
>> > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Feb 23, 2007, at 8:39 AM, drvillo wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi all
>> >>
>> >> I'm about to release an alpha version of my service.
>> >> Since I had the impression that 4.2 was going to be released
>> >> soon I've been postponing the date in the hope to release
>> >> with
>> >> - a more stable version of AMQ (currently it's packaged with a
>> >> month old
>> >> trunk rev.)
>> >> - kaha storing indexes on the filesystem rather than in memory
>> >> - and to get rid of this backport-util-concurrent.jar
>> >>
>> >> Now I read that the jar has been tossed out, but how
>> >> about the quality of the codebase?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks a lot for the feedback, and congratulations
>> >> for the progresses, I'm seeing AMQ getting better at each
>> >> checkout:)
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Francesco
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-
>> >> tf3277616s2354.html#a9115227
>> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-tf3277616s2354.html#a9117116
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-tf3277616s2354.html#a9117428
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Spam: 5.0] AMQ 4.2 status
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Given that a few things have changed in 4.2.x we'll be renaming that
5.0 as the OpenWire protocol will be enhanced, the code will move to
Java 5 and other things are changing (such as dispatching, spool to
disk stuff and so forth).
So if you can wait a month or so, I'd go with 5.0, otherwise go for a
4.1.x release which should all be binary compatible with each other.
On 2/23/07, drvillo <f....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob
>
> the service is announced here:
>
> http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/hostcount/hostcount++/
>
> background here:
>
> http://www.ripe.net/hostcount/
>
> What I'm interested mainly in a new release is the stability
> of Kaha (I've just posted on this).
> Java 5 would be nice to have, but it's quite more important
> for example that interfaces don't change between 4.1 and 4.2,
> there's no point in releasing a long running service which will
> already have binary incompatibilities next month...
>
> thanks for the reply anyway, I would just like to know which
> moves to take.
>
> Cheers
> Francesco
>
>
> rajdavies wrote:
> >
> > Hi Francesco,
> >
> > just out interest what's the service you're releasing?
> >
> > We are currently debating about providing another maintenance version
> > of the 4.1 branch, whilst continue to add enhancements in to trunk,
> > with the aim to be the next major release to version 5.0
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Rob Davies
> > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > On Feb 23, 2007, at 8:39 AM, drvillo wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> I'm about to release an alpha version of my service.
> >> Since I had the impression that 4.2 was going to be released
> >> soon I've been postponing the date in the hope to release
> >> with
> >> - a more stable version of AMQ (currently it's packaged with a
> >> month old
> >> trunk rev.)
> >> - kaha storing indexes on the filesystem rather than in memory
> >> - and to get rid of this backport-util-concurrent.jar
> >>
> >> Now I read that the jar has been tossed out, but how
> >> about the quality of the codebase?
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for the feedback, and congratulations
> >> for the progresses, I'm seeing AMQ getting better at each
> >> checkout:)
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Francesco
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-
> >> tf3277616s2354.html#a9115227
> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-tf3277616s2354.html#a9117116
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: [Spam: 5.0] AMQ 4.2 status
Posted by drvillo <f....@gmail.com>.
Hi Rob
the service is announced here:
http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/hostcount/hostcount++/
background here:
http://www.ripe.net/hostcount/
What I'm interested mainly in a new release is the stability
of Kaha (I've just posted on this).
Java 5 would be nice to have, but it's quite more important
for example that interfaces don't change between 4.1 and 4.2,
there's no point in releasing a long running service which will
already have binary incompatibilities next month...
thanks for the reply anyway, I would just like to know which
moves to take.
Cheers
Francesco
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Hi Francesco,
>
> just out interest what's the service you're releasing?
>
> We are currently debating about providing another maintenance version
> of the 4.1 branch, whilst continue to add enhancements in to trunk,
> with the aim to be the next major release to version 5.0
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob Davies
> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> On Feb 23, 2007, at 8:39 AM, drvillo wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm about to release an alpha version of my service.
>> Since I had the impression that 4.2 was going to be released
>> soon I've been postponing the date in the hope to release
>> with
>> - a more stable version of AMQ (currently it's packaged with a
>> month old
>> trunk rev.)
>> - kaha storing indexes on the filesystem rather than in memory
>> - and to get rid of this backport-util-concurrent.jar
>>
>> Now I read that the jar has been tossed out, but how
>> about the quality of the codebase?
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the feedback, and congratulations
>> for the progresses, I'm seeing AMQ getting better at each
>> checkout:)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Francesco
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-
>> tf3277616s2354.html#a9115227
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-tf3277616s2354.html#a9117116
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AMQ 4.2 status
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Francesco,
just out interest what's the service you're releasing?
We are currently debating about providing another maintenance version
of the 4.1 branch, whilst continue to add enhancements in to trunk,
with the aim to be the next major release to version 5.0
cheers,
Rob Davies
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
On Feb 23, 2007, at 8:39 AM, drvillo wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I'm about to release an alpha version of my service.
> Since I had the impression that 4.2 was going to be released
> soon I've been postponing the date in the hope to release
> with
> - a more stable version of AMQ (currently it's packaged with a
> month old
> trunk rev.)
> - kaha storing indexes on the filesystem rather than in memory
> - and to get rid of this backport-util-concurrent.jar
>
> Now I read that the jar has been tossed out, but how
> about the quality of the codebase?
>
> Thanks a lot for the feedback, and congratulations
> for the progresses, I'm seeing AMQ getting better at each
> checkout:)
>
> Cheers
> Francesco
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-
> tf3277616s2354.html#a9115227
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>