You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2009/09/11 08:34:43 UTC
There's still hope for 2.2...
We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug
we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is
getting very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a
number of our snapshot dependencies.
At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like
to get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are
working on and an estimate for completion.
Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.
many thanks
david jencks
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
AMQ 5.3.0 and Jetty v7 have been released.
http://www.h-online.com/open/Jetty-7-arrives-from-Eclipse-and-Webtide--/news/114427
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we
> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting
> very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of
> our snapshot dependencies.
>
> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are
> working on and an estimate for completion.
>
> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
> 2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
>
Re: put XSD schemas on G web
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 30, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Radim Kolar wrote:
>
>
>
> Ellen Tang-2 wrote:
>>
>> Ellen,
>>
>> I can't open the URL in your email:
>>
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geonimo-module-1.2.xsd<http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geronimo-module-1.2.xsd
>> >
>>
>> Is there any typo in there?
>>
>
> There is no typo, but these XSD files are not at that URL yet. My
> message
> was proposal for Geronimo web space change, because it will help
> people with
> validating XML editors to write deployement plans. I dont have
> access rights
> to upload XSD files at that location.
Hi Radim,
Does http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/ meet your needs? For example,
geronimo-module-1.2.xsd can be found here:
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/deployment-1.2
--kevan
Re: put XSD schemas on G web
Posted by Radim Kolar <hs...@sendmail.cz>.
Ellen Tang-2 wrote:
>
> Ellen,
>
> I can't open the URL in your email:
>
> http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geonimo-module-1.2.xsd<http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geronimo-module-1.2.xsd>
>
> Is there any typo in there?
>
There is no typo, but these XSD files are not at that URL yet. My message
was proposal for Geronimo web space change, because it will help people with
validating XML editors to write deployement plans. I dont have access rights
to upload XSD files at that location.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p25681686.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: put XSD schemas on G web
Posted by chi runhua <ch...@gmail.com>.
Hi Radim,
You may find XSD files under <geronimo_home>/schema directory. I didn't look
into the code to find out whether schema validation was done against local
.xsd files.
I am not sure if it's necessary to put these schema files in text/xml format
on G website if validation happens on local.
Hope someone with more experiences in G development could answer the
question.
When you are developing applications in Eclipse, I'd like to recommend GEP
cause it could help you with development of deployment plans, especially
using its Geronimo Plan Editor and wizards.
Thanks.
Jeff C
> 2009/9/25 Radim Kolar <hs...@sendmail.cz>
>
>
>> These diagrams drawn from XSD are very nice. I recommend to put plain XSD
>> files in text/xml format on G web similar how maven have it. Desired URL
>> will look like:
>>
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geronimo-module-1.2.xsd
>>
>> we can then start using this URL in xsi:schemaLocation so XML editors can
>> check syntax during typing deployement plans and then update deployment
>> examples to let people know about it.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p25610559.html
>> Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
Re: put XSD schemas on G web
Posted by Ellen Tang <lt...@gmail.com>.
Hi Radim,
I can't open the URL in your email:
http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geonimo-module-1.2.xsd<http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geronimo-module-1.2.xsd>
Is there any typo in there?
Ellen
2009/9/25 Radim Kolar <hs...@sendmail.cz>
>
> These diagrams drawn from XSD are very nice. I recommend to put plain XSD
> files in text/xml format on G web similar how maven have it. Desired URL
> will look like:
>
> http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geronimo-module-1.2.xsd
>
> we can then start using this URL in xsi:schemaLocation so XML editors can
> check syntax during typing deployement plans and then update deployment
> examples to let people know about it.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p25610559.html
> Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
put XSD schemas on G web
Posted by Radim Kolar <hs...@sendmail.cz>.
These diagrams drawn from XSD are very nice. I recommend to put plain XSD
files in text/xml format on G web similar how maven have it. Desired URL
will look like:
http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geronimo-module-1.2.xsd
we can then start using this URL in xsi:schemaLocation so XML editors can
check syntax during typing deployement plans and then update deployment
examples to let people know about it.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p25610559.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: documentation is important too
Posted by chi runhua <ch...@gmail.com>.
Hi Radim, thanks for your comments.
Details of elements in each deployment plan, you may refer to [1]. And I
hope this is what you are looking for.
About samples, Geronimo has a complex sample application named daytrader,
but its latest version for G2.2 is still under working. You may svn co the
source code for G2.1.3 from [2] for reference.
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/understanding-deployment-plans.html
[2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/daytrader/branches/2.1.3/
Anything else, please let us know.
Jeff
Re: documentation is important too
Posted by Radim Kolar <hs...@sendmail.cz>.
RunHua Chi wrote:
>
> We'd like to hear more about your comments to the document such as the
> documents are not well-orgnized? what kind of topics are missing? Or you
> can
> share your experience briefly, we can help to document? I think more
> details
> will do more help.
>
I have not checked WAS CE examples, but examples on G web page didn't have
xsd files referenced in xml header, it was quite difficult to guess what
tags are used because eclipse xml editor didnt helped much. ibm
documentation also didnt mention where xsd files are available via HTTP.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/wasce/V2.1.1/en/developing-deployment-plans.html
i used some examples on web site as reference but they were too simple.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p25531272.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: documentation is important too
Posted by chi runhua <ch...@gmail.com>.
Well, I think it's something missing in Geronimo. You might want to file a
JIRA for this one.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO
And I am also interested in the struggle you experienced, as you mentioned
earlier, it took you almost entire day to write it correct.
Could you let us more details about the scenario, I believe your experience
could help us to improve the document.
Thanks alot.
Jeff C
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Radim Kolar <hs...@sendmail.cz> wrote:
>
>
> RunHua Chi wrote:
> >
> > As for the examples that you mentioned, in my understanding, G Doc
> > already
> > has certain topics for those:
> > 1. Database security realm, you may refer to
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/database-sql-realm.html
> >
> Database security realm is something different, it is about checking
> userids
> against database. I am talking about restricting access to Derby
> database itself.
> Example: (G in default setup)
> ij> connect 'jdbc:derby://localhost/SystemDatabase';
> ij> show tables;
> TABLE_SCHEM |TABLE_NAME |REMARKS
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SYS |SYSALIASES |
> SYS |SYSCHECKS |
> SYS |SYSCOLPERMS |
> SYS |SYSCOLUMNS |
>
> same for message queues. In short no security restrictions are in place.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p25450084.html
> Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: documentation is important too
Posted by Radim Kolar <hs...@sendmail.cz>.
RunHua Chi wrote:
>
> As for the examples that you mentioned, in my understanding, G Doc
> already
> has certain topics for those:
> 1. Database security realm, you may refer to
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/database-sql-realm.html
>
Database security realm is something different, it is about checking userids
against database. I am talking about restricting access to Derby
database itself.
Example: (G in default setup)
ij> connect 'jdbc:derby://localhost/SystemDatabase';
ij> show tables;
TABLE_SCHEM |TABLE_NAME |REMARKS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SYS |SYSALIASES |
SYS |SYSCHECKS |
SYS |SYSCOLPERMS |
SYS |SYSCOLUMNS |
same for message queues. In short no security restrictions are in place.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p25450084.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: documentation is important too
Posted by chi runhua <ch...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I agree that documentation is really important to the success of
Geronimo.
We have lots of changes in terms of security, web container integration
mechanism as well as GEP improvements for G2.2, and we know some of
information are not well documented yet. For the current status of G2.2 doc
development, you may refer to
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/apache-geronimo-v22-documentation-development-status.html
Beyond these items listed, I believe there are lots of topics to be updated
such as new samples, screenshots and so on. Therefore, we would appreciate
any individual who can contribute to the documents and especially for those
who has successful experiences with configuration of certain components.
As for the examples that you mentioned, in my understanding, G Doc already
has certain topics for those:
1. Database security realm, you may refer to
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/database-sql-realm.html
2. Real samples, we have sample applications for test and evaluation, you
may refer to
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/sample-applications.html#Sampleapplications-AvailableSampleApplicationsor
WAS CE samples which can be deployed on Geronimo as well
3. Tutorial for various applications' development, which might not cover
every corner by now but it would be
applaudable**<http://www.iciba.com/applaudable/>if we could have more
and more tutorials on website. For this part, you may
refer to
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/developing-web-applications.html
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/developing-ejb-applications.html
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/developing-jpa-applications.html
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/developing-application-clients.html
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/developing-web-services.html
We'd like to hear more about your comments to the document such as the
documents are not well-orgnized? what kind of topics are missing? Or you can
share your experience briefly, we can help to document? I think more details
will do more help.
Thanks alot.
Jeff C
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Radim Kolar <hs...@sendmail.cz> wrote:
>
>
> Quintin Beukes-2 wrote:
> >
> > They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can
> > potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's
> > experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's
> > success.
> >
> I see it that biggest problem with Geronimo is lack of good documentation,
> mainly good documentation on security is still missing. After reading users
> mailing list for a while people asks for documents about:
>
> How to secure internal derby database from connections into geronimo from
> outside? They want to have something like: for database XYZ user X and Y
> can
> connect. it can be probably done by binding security realm into database.
> it
> would be great if we can click it in gui.
>
> same thing for message queues.
>
> oh and deployment plans are another topic. There are some samples on doc
> website but i would really like to see some real world example for example
> web application with more modules, jpa and message queues. it took me
> almost
> entire day until i managed to write it correctly myself.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p25443963.html
> Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
documentation is important too
Posted by Radim Kolar <hs...@sendmail.cz>.
Quintin Beukes-2 wrote:
>
> They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can
> potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's
> experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's
> success.
>
I see it that biggest problem with Geronimo is lack of good documentation,
mainly good documentation on security is still missing. After reading users
mailing list for a while people asks for documents about:
How to secure internal derby database from connections into geronimo from
outside? They want to have something like: for database XYZ user X and Y can
connect. it can be probably done by binding security realm into database. it
would be great if we can click it in gui.
same thing for message queues.
oh and deployment plans are another topic. There are some samples on doc
website but i would really like to see some real world example for example
web application with more modules, jpa and message queues. it took me almost
entire day until i managed to write it correctly myself.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p25443963.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Forrest Xia <fo...@gmail.com>.
Hope someone could look into
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4222. It's an important
reliability issue about db connectivity.
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Jack Cai <gr...@gmail.com>.
I finished the patch for the console filter to improve its performance:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874
Hopefully someone could review it...
-Jack
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Forrest Xia <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and
>> testing the Daytrader plugins and plans.
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>
>
> Donald, once you roll out all of changes on daytrader 2.2, I will have a
> testing on it.
>
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Forrest Xia <fo...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and
> testing the Daytrader plugins and plans.
>
>
> -Donald
Donald, once you roll out all of changes on daytrader 2.2, I will have a
testing on it.
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and
testing the Daytrader plugins and plans.
-Donald
Forrest Xia wrote:
> I am working on G 2.2 samples. Basically, I hope the existing G 2.2
> samples plugins could be installable and runable on G 2.2 server.
>
> I will post my results here soon.
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Forrest Xia <fo...@gmail.com>.
I am working on G 2.2 samples. Basically, I hope the existing G 2.2 samples
plugins could be installable and runable on G 2.2 server.
I will post my results here soon.
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
Is there an approximate date of Geronimo 2.2 release ? I remembered that
last time, what I got is in the early October.
Thanks !
2009/9/14 Jack Cai <gr...@gmail.com>
> I'm working on improving the console filter performance. Will open a
> JIRA...
>
> -Jack
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Quintin Beukes <qu...@skywalk.co.za>wrote:
>
>> There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I
>> seriously think they need to be addressed. They are:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4867
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1070
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4860
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861
>>
>> The last one is a regression of sorts (in other words is wasn't present in
>> 2.1).
>>
>> They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can
>> potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's
>> experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's
>> success.
>>
>> Q
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean
>> GERONIMO-4625
>> >
>> >
>> > 2009/9/11 Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
>> >> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the
>> alreadyexisted
>> >> exception
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
>> >> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
>> >> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot,
>> >> that will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
>> >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
>> >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>> >>
>> >> Thanks !
>> >>
>> >> 2009/9/11 David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug
>> we
>> >>> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is
>> getting very
>> >>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
>> >>> snapshot dependencies.
>> >>>
>> >>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like
>> to
>> >>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are
>> working on
>> >>> and an estimate for completion.
>> >>>
>> >>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
>> 2.2
>> >>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>> >>>
>> >>> many thanks
>> >>> david jencks
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Ivan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ivan
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Quintin Beukes
>>
>
>
--
Ivan
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Jack Cai <gr...@gmail.com>.
I'm working on improving the console filter performance. Will open a JIRA...
-Jack
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Quintin Beukes <qu...@skywalk.co.za>wrote:
> There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I
> seriously think they need to be addressed. They are:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4867
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1070
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4860
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861
>
> The last one is a regression of sorts (in other words is wasn't present in
> 2.1).
>
> They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can
> potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's
> experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's
> success.
>
> Q
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean
> GERONIMO-4625
> >
> >
> > 2009/9/11 Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
> >> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
> >> exception
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
> >> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
> >> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot,
> >> that will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
> >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
> >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >>
> >> 2009/9/11 David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
> >>>
> >>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we
> >>> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting
> very
> >>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
> >>> snapshot dependencies.
> >>>
> >>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like
> to
> >>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are
> working on
> >>> and an estimate for completion.
> >>>
> >>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
> 2.2
> >>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
> >>>
> >>> many thanks
> >>> david jencks
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ivan
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ivan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Quintin Beukes
>
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Quintin Beukes <qu...@skywalk.co.za>.
There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I
seriously think they need to be addressed. They are:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4867
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1070
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4860
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861
The last one is a regression of sorts (in other words is wasn't present in 2.1).
They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can
potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's
experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's
success.
Q
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean GERONIMO-4625
>
>
> 2009/9/11 Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>
>>
>> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
>> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
>> exception
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
>> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
>> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot,
>> that will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
>> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
>> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>> 2009/9/11 David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
>>>
>>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we
>>> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very
>>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
>>> snapshot dependencies.
>>>
>>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
>>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on
>>> and an estimate for completion.
>>>
>>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2
>>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>>
>>> many thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ivan
>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
--
Quintin Beukes
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean
GERONIMO-4625<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603>
2009/9/11 Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>
> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
> exception
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot, that
> will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>
> Thanks !
>
> 2009/9/11 David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
>
> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we had
>> problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very
>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
>> snapshot dependencies.
>>
>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on
>> and an estimate for completion.
>>
>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2
>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>
>> many thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
--
Ivan
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
I'm working on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4852
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4851
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4850
And hopefully they can be included in G22
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
> exception
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot, that
> will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>
> Thanks !
>
> 2009/9/11 David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
>
> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we had
>> problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very
>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
>> snapshot dependencies.
>>
>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on
>> and an estimate for completion.
>>
>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2
>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>
>> many thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
--
Shawn
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
exception
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot, that
will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
Thanks !
2009/9/11 David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we had
> problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very
> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
> snapshot dependencies.
>
> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on
> and an estimate for completion.
>
> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2
> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
>
--
Ivan
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Jack Cai <gr...@gmail.com>.
David, are you working on a new TranQL release in order to include the stale
connection patch?
-Jack
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just rolled back to the 1.7 level of javamail.
>
> Also, Jarek updated the openejbVersion to 3.1.2.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
>
> Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Agree, if that is the last set of artifacts holding up the release, then
>> we can roll back to 1.7.
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>>
>>>> I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has checked
>>>> in several fixes in the past few months....
>>>>
>>> I'm not sure those fixes are worth spinning a new javamail release just
>>> for inclusion on the 2.2 release.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Donald
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Jencks wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we
>>>>> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very
>>>>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
>>>>> snapshot dependencies.
>>>>>
>>>>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like
>>>>> to get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working
>>>>> on and an estimate for completion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
>>>>> 2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>>>>
>>>>> many thanks
>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Just rolled back to the 1.7 level of javamail.
Also, Jarek updated the openejbVersion to 3.1.2.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Agree, if that is the last set of artifacts holding up the release, then
> we can roll back to 1.7.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>> I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has
>>> checked in several fixes in the past few months....
>> I'm not sure those fixes are worth spinning a new javamail release
>> just for inclusion on the 2.2 release.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> David Jencks wrote:
>>>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug
>>>> we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is
>>>> getting very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a
>>>> number of our snapshot dependencies.
>>>>
>>>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd
>>>> like to get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what
>>>> they are working on and an estimate for completion.
>>>>
>>>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get
>>>> into 2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>>>
>>>> many thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Agree, if that is the last set of artifacts holding up the release, then
we can roll back to 1.7.
-Donald
Rick McGuire wrote:
> Donald Woods wrote:
>> I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has
>> checked in several fixes in the past few months....
> I'm not sure those fixes are worth spinning a new javamail release just
> for inclusion on the 2.2 release.
>
> Rick
>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> David Jencks wrote:
>>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug
>>> we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is
>>> getting very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a
>>> number of our snapshot dependencies.
>>>
>>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like
>>> to get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are
>>> working on and an estimate for completion.
>>>
>>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
>>> 2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>>
>>> many thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Donald Woods wrote:
> I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has
> checked in several fixes in the past few months....
I'm not sure those fixes are worth spinning a new javamail release just
for inclusion on the 2.2 release.
Rick
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> David Jencks wrote:
>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug
>> we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is
>> getting very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a
>> number of our snapshot dependencies.
>>
>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like
>> to get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are
>> working on and an estimate for completion.
>>
>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
>> 2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>
>> many thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has checked
in several fixes in the past few months....
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
> We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we
> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting
> very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of
> our snapshot dependencies.
>
> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are
> working on and an estimate for completion.
>
> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
> 2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
>
Re: There's still hope for 2.2...
Posted by frapien <fr...@gmx.de>.
are there any new release plans for 2.2?
3Q2009 is over and needs an update under
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-22-release-status.html
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p26156696.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.