You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by ji...@apache.org on 2004/05/13 17:46:56 UTC
[jira] Created: (XERCESC-1212) Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: XERCESC-1212
Summary: Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Type: Bug
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Major
Project: Xerces-C++
Components:
Utilities
Validating Parser (DTD)
Validating Parser (Schema) (Xerces 1.5 or up only)
Versions:
2.5.0
Assignee:
Reporter: Robert Buck
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 8:46 AM
Updated: Thu, 13 May 2004 8:46 AM
Environment: ALL
Description:
For those developers that use the freely distributable math library, or fdlibm, a conflict exists between the definition of UNKNOWN. Specifically, if you include fdlibm headers prior to xerces-c headers, xerces-c user applications will not compile.
Choosing common names such as UNKNOWN is not helpful to those of us that link in many third-party libraries, since the likelihood that a conflict will exist with such a name is greatly increased. Please prefix the names with something that distinguishes the enum value as being from Xerces-C. In the very least, set it as a standard practice in future enum types to use more conspicuous names. It would be nice if you changed these before these names get entrenched in C++ user code.
I do have a work-around, but it's rather ugly. I just raise this to your attention, mostly to suggest the adoption of such a coding practice.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
[jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1212) Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Posted by ji...@apache.org.
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Jesse Pelton
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 9:45 AM
Body:
Does your compiler support C++ namespaces? Namespaces are designed to address precisely this issue, and Xerces provides tools that you should be able to use to resolve the issue. See http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/program-others.html#CPPNamespace.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212?page=comments#action_35526
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: XERCESC-1212
Summary: Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Type: Bug
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Major
Project: Xerces-C++
Components:
Utilities
Validating Parser (DTD)
Validating Parser (Schema) (Xerces 1.5 or up only)
Versions:
2.5.0
Assignee:
Reporter: Robert Buck
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 8:46 AM
Updated: Thu, 13 May 2004 9:45 AM
Environment: ALL
Description:
For those developers that use the freely distributable math library, or fdlibm, a conflict exists between the definition of UNKNOWN. Specifically, if you include fdlibm headers prior to xerces-c headers, xerces-c user applications will not compile.
Choosing common names such as UNKNOWN is not helpful to those of us that link in many third-party libraries, since the likelihood that a conflict will exist with such a name is greatly increased. Please prefix the names with something that distinguishes the enum value as being from Xerces-C. In the very least, set it as a standard practice in future enum types to use more conspicuous names. It would be nice if you changed these before these names get entrenched in C++ user code.
I do have a work-around, but it's rather ugly. I just raise this to your attention, mostly to suggest the adoption of such a coding practice.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
[jira] Updated: (XERCESC-1212) Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Posted by xe...@xml.apache.org.
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Alberto Massari (mailto:amassari@progress.com)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 3:34 AM
Changes:
Component changed to Build
Component changed from Utilities
Component changed from Validating Parser (DTD)
Component changed from Validating Parser (Schema) (Xerces 1.5 or up only)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
For a full history of the issue, see:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212?page=history
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: XERCESC-1212
Summary: Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Type: Bug
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Major
Project: Xerces-C++
Components:
Build
Versions:
2.5.0
Assignee:
Reporter: Robert Buck
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 8:46 AM
Updated: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 3:34 AM
Environment: ALL
Description:
For those developers that use the freely distributable math library, or fdlibm, a conflict exists between the definition of UNKNOWN. Specifically, if you include fdlibm headers prior to xerces-c headers, xerces-c user applications will not compile.
Choosing common names such as UNKNOWN is not helpful to those of us that link in many third-party libraries, since the likelihood that a conflict will exist with such a name is greatly increased. Please prefix the names with something that distinguishes the enum value as being from Xerces-C. In the very least, set it as a standard practice in future enum types to use more conspicuous names. It would be nice if you changed these before these names get entrenched in C++ user code.
I do have a work-around, but it's rather ugly. I just raise this to your attention, mostly to suggest the adoption of such a coding practice.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
[jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1212) Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Posted by ji...@apache.org.
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Robert Buck
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 10:36 AM
Body:
I can do that as well, if I can only find on Sun's site where they would take bug reports on fdlibm, and convince them to make the change.
Since fdlibm has a greater install base (at least presently), it would make sense (at least in my own mind) changing it in Xerces-C. Especially since this is actually rather new code in Xerces-C. Whereas, the code in fdlibm is 11 years older than the Xerces-C code. I'm not saying what Sun Microsystems did was all that brilliant - the developers that wrote this ought to have known better than to use something as common as UNKNOWN in a #define. That's just asking for trouble.
But alas, I still would like to request that either (or both) the following occur:
a. establish a prefix convention for enums, perhaps X_ for future code
b. change this particular enum to something other than "UNKNOWN" (please?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212?page=comments#action_35529
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: XERCESC-1212
Summary: Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Type: Bug
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Major
Project: Xerces-C++
Components:
Utilities
Validating Parser (DTD)
Validating Parser (Schema) (Xerces 1.5 or up only)
Versions:
2.5.0
Assignee:
Reporter: Robert Buck
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 8:46 AM
Updated: Thu, 13 May 2004 10:36 AM
Environment: ALL
Description:
For those developers that use the freely distributable math library, or fdlibm, a conflict exists between the definition of UNKNOWN. Specifically, if you include fdlibm headers prior to xerces-c headers, xerces-c user applications will not compile.
Choosing common names such as UNKNOWN is not helpful to those of us that link in many third-party libraries, since the likelihood that a conflict will exist with such a name is greatly increased. Please prefix the names with something that distinguishes the enum value as being from Xerces-C. In the very least, set it as a standard practice in future enum types to use more conspicuous names. It would be nice if you changed these before these names get entrenched in C++ user code.
I do have a work-around, but it's rather ugly. I just raise this to your attention, mostly to suggest the adoption of such a coding practice.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
[jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1212) Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Posted by ji...@apache.org.
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Robert Buck
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 9:55 AM
Body:
Yes, but namespaces is not at issue - the C preprocessor is. The issue specifically is that many C libraries use #define. This particular one (fdlibm) does the following:
#define UNKNOWN 5
That is the issue. The only way around this is to change the definition, or change the name of the enum in Xerces. The latter is preferable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212?page=comments#action_35527
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: XERCESC-1212
Summary: Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Type: Bug
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Major
Project: Xerces-C++
Components:
Utilities
Validating Parser (DTD)
Validating Parser (Schema) (Xerces 1.5 or up only)
Versions:
2.5.0
Assignee:
Reporter: Robert Buck
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 8:46 AM
Updated: Thu, 13 May 2004 9:55 AM
Environment: ALL
Description:
For those developers that use the freely distributable math library, or fdlibm, a conflict exists between the definition of UNKNOWN. Specifically, if you include fdlibm headers prior to xerces-c headers, xerces-c user applications will not compile.
Choosing common names such as UNKNOWN is not helpful to those of us that link in many third-party libraries, since the likelihood that a conflict will exist with such a name is greatly increased. Please prefix the names with something that distinguishes the enum value as being from Xerces-C. In the very least, set it as a standard practice in future enum types to use more conspicuous names. It would be nice if you changed these before these names get entrenched in C++ user code.
I do have a work-around, but it's rather ugly. I just raise this to your attention, mostly to suggest the adoption of such a coding practice.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
[jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1212) Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Posted by ji...@apache.org.
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: David Bertoni
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 10:16 AM
Body:
I hope you've also filed the same request with the developers of that library. After all, it's that library which is at fault, and UNKNOWN could conflict libraries other than Xerces-C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212?page=comments#action_35528
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1212
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: XERCESC-1212
Summary: Xerces-C Conflicts with fdlibm: enum names too common
Type: Bug
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Major
Project: Xerces-C++
Components:
Utilities
Validating Parser (DTD)
Validating Parser (Schema) (Xerces 1.5 or up only)
Versions:
2.5.0
Assignee:
Reporter: Robert Buck
Created: Thu, 13 May 2004 8:46 AM
Updated: Thu, 13 May 2004 10:16 AM
Environment: ALL
Description:
For those developers that use the freely distributable math library, or fdlibm, a conflict exists between the definition of UNKNOWN. Specifically, if you include fdlibm headers prior to xerces-c headers, xerces-c user applications will not compile.
Choosing common names such as UNKNOWN is not helpful to those of us that link in many third-party libraries, since the likelihood that a conflict will exist with such a name is greatly increased. Please prefix the names with something that distinguishes the enum value as being from Xerces-C. In the very least, set it as a standard practice in future enum types to use more conspicuous names. It would be nice if you changed these before these names get entrenched in C++ user code.
I do have a work-around, but it's rather ugly. I just raise this to your attention, mostly to suggest the adoption of such a coding practice.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org