Re: Where should JavaScript componentType samples go?

[Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>]

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:

[snip]
> ant elder wrote:
>> Thats what I'll start doing then, its easy enough to move them if 
>> anyone has
>> a different suggestion.
>>
>> If they're separate projects must they really use the
>> org.apache.tuscany.samples.javascript... package names or could that be
>> something shorter? Some of those long names are quite hard to read in 
>> the
>> scdl.
>>
>>
[snip] 
> I've been wondering about that for the java samples as well. Currently 
> we have very long package names like 
> org.apache.tuscany.samples.bigbank.account.services.stockquote for 
> example. I think it would be nicer if we could just have stockquote, 
> or sample.stockquote. What do people think?
>
I was doing some tests with our samples today and bumped again into very 
long package names like 
org.apache.tuscany.samples.bigbank.account.services.stockquote. I would 
like to make the package names in the samples shorter, something like 
sample.stockquote. Any opinions?

-- 
Jean-Sebastien

Re: Where should JavaScript componentType samples go?

[ant elder <an...@gmail.com>]

I agree, shorter names are more readable.

I used shorter names for the JavaScript samples, have a look and see if
thats better or you can suggest better names or structure:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/samples/JavaScript/

   ...ant

On 4/7/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > ant elder wrote:
> >> Thats what I'll start doing then, its easy enough to move them if
> >> anyone has
> >> a different suggestion.
> >>
> >> If they're separate projects must they really use the
> >> org.apache.tuscany.samples.javascript... package names or could that be
> >> something shorter? Some of those long names are quite hard to read in
> >> the
> >> scdl.
> >>
> >>
> [snip]
> > I've been wondering about that for the java samples as well. Currently
> > we have very long package names like
> > org.apache.tuscany.samples.bigbank.account.services.stockquote for
> > example. I think it would be nicer if we could just have stockquote,
> > or sample.stockquote. What do people think?
> >
> I was doing some tests with our samples today and bumped again into very
> long package names like
> org.apache.tuscany.samples.bigbank.account.services.stockquote. I would
> like to make the package names in the samples shorter, something like
> sample.stockquote. Any opinions?
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>