You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com> on 2024/01/05 05:15:18 UTC
Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
*Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the solution for
daemon thread performance issue
daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's taking
significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread startup.
Regards,
Koti
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 14/01/2024 12:43, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> hi
>
> Daemon threads have identified the performance issue inorder to complete .
>
> so bootstrap has its performance issue as this loader thread is using
> daemon thread.
>
> inorder to resolve the issue we will yield the corresponding thread
That explanation makes no sense.
If English is not your first language, try using your first language.
Someone here likely speaks it and those that don't can use Google translate.
Mark
>
> regards,
> koti
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 4:13 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> You have yet to provide an explanation of the problem you are trying to
>> solve.
>>
>> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
>> from you on this topic will be ignored.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> On 14/01/2024 12:05, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>> hi team
>>>
>>> before clicking the link or check new private window in mozilla
>>>
>>> image.png
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> when we browse the following link
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> <
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> image.png
>>>
>>> Here the code page is shown as above
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:41 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
>>> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> hi mark,
>>>
>>> please check if the code is now available at your end I verified
>>> from my end it can be visible
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
>>> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just now
>>> i committed my changes to a new public repo
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> <
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>>>
>>>
>>> Please find my attested changes in whole file 'Bootstrap.java'.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>> > Hi Team,
>>> >
>>> > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my
>>> branch along with the
>>> > pr created,
>>> >
>>> > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
>>> >
>>> > Comparing singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>> ·
>>> > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com
>>> <http://github.com>)
>>> >
>>> <
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>> <
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>>>>
>>>
>>> That URI returns a 404.
>>>
>>> Unless and until you provide the information requested,
>>> further messages
>>> from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> > From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>>
>>> > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
>>> > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon
>>> thread in tomcat
>>> > To: <dev@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org
>>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Please read my previous response and follow the
>>> instructions you were given.
>>> >
>>> > Mark
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>> >> Hi All,
>>> >>
>>> >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull
>>> request as I have
>>> >> been trying to give the change at latest.
>>> >>
>>> >> regards,
>>> >> Koti
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas
>>> <markt@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>> >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at
>>> Github
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request
>>> creation failed.
>>> >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat
>>> repository. The only
>>> >>> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for
>>> providing the solution
>>> > for
>>> >>>> daemon thread performance issue
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed
>> fix.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please also provide a better description of the problem
>>> you are trying
>>> >>> to solve.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Mark
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread
>>> activity, and it's
>>> >>> taking
>>> >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just
>>> like
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon
>>> thread startup.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Regards,
>>> >>>> Koti
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
hi all,
please find my sample example.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 1:53 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 15/01/2024 08:45, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Jan 2024, 18:13 koteswara Rao Gundapaneni, <
> > koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> hi
> >>
> >> Daemon threads have identified the performance issue inorder to
> complete .
> >>
> >
> >
> > Thread which is set as daemon by default has performance bottleneck
>
> If that were the case, there would be a general performance issue for
> every Java application.
>
> I am not aware of any general Java performance issue. You have not
> provided any evidence to support your claim that there is a performance
> issue.
>
> > I explain that as below
> >
> > myeg.setDaemon(true);
> > myeg.start();
> >
> >
> > the above start() method is taking long time to complete which is by
> > default performance bottleneck
>
> You have not explained what object "myeg" is. Based on your previous
> statements and the methods called, it appears to be an instance of Thread.
>
> Thread.start() is unlikely to take a long time to complete. Thread.run()
> might take a long time to complete but that will depend on the run()
> method.
>
> >> so bootstrap has its performance issue as this loader thread is using
> >> daemon thread.
>
> Again, you have provided no evidence to support this statement.
>
> > In our code base we have lot of places where we have the code as below as
> > mentioned above.
> >
> > myeg.setDaemon(true);
> > myeg.start();
> >
> >>
> >> inorder to resolve the issue we will yield the corresponding thread
> >
> >
> > Inorder to limit the time taking for above line of code we have the
> > solution like below
> >
> > myeg.setDaemon(true);
> > myeg.start();
> > myeg.yield();
>
> This is nonsense.
>
> The call to vield() happens after the call to start(). It is impossible
> for the call to yield() to make the call to start() faster.
>
> > the yield method declared as above will reduce the time taking for start
> > method
>
> Again, this is nonsense. What you are stating is logically impossible.
>
> > Hope this will make sense if not I will write it in my own language
> telugu.
>
> In additional to reviewing the above nonsense, I have also reviewed the
> proposed change to Bootstrap.java that claims to "fix" whatever issue is
> observed.
>
> The proposed code doesn't even compile due to basic errors such as
> missing ';'.
>
> The proposed code attempts to call a String method (contains())on a
> String array.
>
> The proposed code attempts to assign a String to a String array.
>
> The proposed code contains multiple instances of unhandled checked
> exceptions.
>
> The proposed code attempts to pass a String when a String array is
> required.
>
> The proposed code attempts to compare a Method instance with a String
> instance
>
> With the above errors fixed the code compiles and, somewhat
> miraculously, Tomcat starts. The code has no effect until Tomcat stops
> (because of the call to daemon.setAwait(true). During the stop process a
> NoSuchMethodException is thrown because of the attempt to call the
> Catalina.yield() method that does not exist.
>
> So, in summary, we have:
>
> - a claim of a performance issue that does not exist
>
> - a claimed solution that is logically impossible
>
> - a proposed patch the doesn't compile and is full of errors
>
> - a proposed patch that, when "fixed", doesn't do anything apart from
> trigger an exception on shutdown
>
> I will not be engaging any further in this thread.
>
> Responding to threads like this wastes the Tomcat community's time and
> detracts the community from useful work. I consider threads like this to
> be harmful to the Tomcat community. Should you start further threads
> like this it is likely that you will be blocked from posting to the
> Tomcat mailing lists and/or be blocked from interacting with the Tomcat
> project at Github and/or be blocked from interacting with the Bugzilla
> instance used by Tomcat and/or blocked from interacting with the Tomcat
> project via any other services.
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 15/01/2024 08:45, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2024, 18:13 koteswara Rao Gundapaneni, <
> koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> hi
>>
>> Daemon threads have identified the performance issue inorder to complete .
>>
>
>
> Thread which is set as daemon by default has performance bottleneck
If that were the case, there would be a general performance issue for
every Java application.
I am not aware of any general Java performance issue. You have not
provided any evidence to support your claim that there is a performance
issue.
> I explain that as below
>
> myeg.setDaemon(true);
> myeg.start();
>
>
> the above start() method is taking long time to complete which is by
> default performance bottleneck
You have not explained what object "myeg" is. Based on your previous
statements and the methods called, it appears to be an instance of Thread.
Thread.start() is unlikely to take a long time to complete. Thread.run()
might take a long time to complete but that will depend on the run() method.
>> so bootstrap has its performance issue as this loader thread is using
>> daemon thread.
Again, you have provided no evidence to support this statement.
> In our code base we have lot of places where we have the code as below as
> mentioned above.
>
> myeg.setDaemon(true);
> myeg.start();
>
>>
>> inorder to resolve the issue we will yield the corresponding thread
>
>
> Inorder to limit the time taking for above line of code we have the
> solution like below
>
> myeg.setDaemon(true);
> myeg.start();
> myeg.yield();
This is nonsense.
The call to vield() happens after the call to start(). It is impossible
for the call to yield() to make the call to start() faster.
> the yield method declared as above will reduce the time taking for start
> method
Again, this is nonsense. What you are stating is logically impossible.
> Hope this will make sense if not I will write it in my own language telugu.
In additional to reviewing the above nonsense, I have also reviewed the
proposed change to Bootstrap.java that claims to "fix" whatever issue is
observed.
The proposed code doesn't even compile due to basic errors such as
missing ';'.
The proposed code attempts to call a String method (contains())on a
String array.
The proposed code attempts to assign a String to a String array.
The proposed code contains multiple instances of unhandled checked
exceptions.
The proposed code attempts to pass a String when a String array is required.
The proposed code attempts to compare a Method instance with a String
instance
With the above errors fixed the code compiles and, somewhat
miraculously, Tomcat starts. The code has no effect until Tomcat stops
(because of the call to daemon.setAwait(true). During the stop process a
NoSuchMethodException is thrown because of the attempt to call the
Catalina.yield() method that does not exist.
So, in summary, we have:
- a claim of a performance issue that does not exist
- a claimed solution that is logically impossible
- a proposed patch the doesn't compile and is full of errors
- a proposed patch that, when "fixed", doesn't do anything apart from
trigger an exception on shutdown
I will not be engaging any further in this thread.
Responding to threads like this wastes the Tomcat community's time and
detracts the community from useful work. I consider threads like this to
be harmful to the Tomcat community. Should you start further threads
like this it is likely that you will be blocked from posting to the
Tomcat mailing lists and/or be blocked from interacting with the Tomcat
project at Github and/or be blocked from interacting with the Bugzilla
instance used by Tomcat and/or blocked from interacting with the Tomcat
project via any other services.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
hi all,
On high level view if i look at up with reflection we use in tomcat code
for the existing class in Bootstrap and core jvm methods internally works
excellent
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 11:57 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <
koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am going to provide unit tests through which I identifies the
> performance issue at core JVM method
>
> Let me provide this
>
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, 21:15 Christopher Schultz, <
> chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 1/15/24 03:45, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> > On Sun, 14 Jan 2024, 18:13 koteswara Rao Gundapaneni, <
>> > koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> hi
>> >>
>> >> Daemon threads have identified the performance issue inorder to
>> complete .
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Thread which is set as daemon by default has performance bottleneck
>> >
>> > I explain that as below
>> >
>> > myeg.setDaemon(true);
>> > myeg.start();
>> >
>> >
>> > the above start() method is taking long time to complete which is by
>> > default performance bottleneck
>>
>> The Thread.start() method is not something under the control of the
>> Apache Tomcat team. That is a core JVM method.
>>
>> >> so bootstrap has its performance issue as this loader thread is using
>> >> daemon thread.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > In our code base we have lot of places where we have the code as below
>> as
>> > mentioned above.
>> >
>> > myeg.setDaemon(true);
>> > myeg.start();
>>
>> Whose code is "our code"?
>>
>> >> inorder to resolve the issue we will yield the corresponding thread
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Inorder to limit the time taking for above line of code we have the
>> > solution like below
>> >
>> > myeg.setDaemon(true);
>> > myeg.start();
>> > myeg.yield();
>>
>> How can a call to Thread.yield() which is made *after* a call to
>> Thread.start() make the call to Thread.start() execute more quickly?
>>
>> Here is the documentation for Thread.yield (with emphasis added by me):
>>
>> "
>> A hint to the scheduler that the current thread is willing to yield its
>> current use of a processor. **The scheduler is free to ignore this hint.**
>>
>> Yield is a heuristic attempt to improve relative progression between
>> threads that would otherwise over-utilise a CPU. Its use should be
>> combined with detailed profiling and benchmarking to ensure that it
>> actually has the desired effect.
>>
>> **It is rarely appropriate to use this method.** It may be useful for
>> debugging or testing purposes, where it may help to reproduce bugs due
>> to race conditions. It may also be useful when designing concurrency
>> control constructs such as the ones in the java.util.concurrent.locks
>> package.
>> "
>>
>> Note that calling someOtherThread.yield() actually causes the current
>> thread (e.g. Main in your likely example) to yield, rather than
>> instructing someOtherThread to yield.
>>
>> If this is intentional, it looks like what you are trying to do is
>> instruct the current thread to cause Thread called "myeg" (aka
>> someOtherThread) to start and then to immediate yield the current
>> thread's time back to the scheduler.
>>
>> This should not be necessary.
>>
>> > the yield method declared as above will reduce the time taking for start
>> > method
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hope this will make sense if not I will write it in my own language
>> telugu.
>>
>> I get the idea you are trying to convey, but it does not make much
>> technical sense to me.
>>
>> Your code for Bootstrap.start() is using reflection to invoke
>> Catalina.start from your main thread. But you are not running any of
>> your own code in any non-main thread, so of course the call to
>> Catalina.start is taking "a long time": there is a lot of work to be
>> done to bring a server online.
>>
>> If you want your main thread to continue while Catalina is starting,
>> then you should run that in a separate thread. For example:
>>
>> new Thread(r -> catalina.start()).start();
>>
>> If you think there is a performance problem in Apache Tomcat, the best
>> way to demonstrate it is with a Unit Test which reproduces the problem.
>>
>> What you are presenting appears to be either a misunderstanding of
>> threading in Java or a misuse of Tomcat's Catalina class.
>>
>> If you are concerned with performance, you might want to use less
>> reflection in your code, since it's very slow compared to direct method
>> invocations.
>>
>> -chris
>>
>> >> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 4:13 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> You have yet to provide an explanation of the problem you are trying
>> to
>> >>> solve.
>> >>>
>> >>> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further
>> messages
>> >>> from you on this topic will be ignored.
>> >>>
>> >>> Mark
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 14/01/2024 12:05, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> >>>> hi team
>> >>>>
>> >>>> before clicking the link or check new private window in mozilla
>> >>>>
>> >>>> image.png
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> when we browse the following link
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> >>> <
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> image.png
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Here the code page is shown as above
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:41 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
>> >>>> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> hi mark,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> please check if the code is now available at your end I verified
>> >>>> from my end it can be visible
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
>> >>>> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <mailto:koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com
>> >>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just
>> now
>> >>>> i committed my changes to a new public repo
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> >>> <
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please find my attested changes in whole file
>> 'Bootstrap.java'.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <
>> markt@apache.org
>> >>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> >>>> > Hi Team,
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my
>> >>>> branch along with the
>> >>>> > pr created,
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Comparing
>> >>> singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
>> >>>> > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com
>> >>>> <http://github.com>)
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> <
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>> >>> <
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> That URI returns a 404.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Unless and until you provide the information requested,
>> >>>> further messages
>> >>>> from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Mark
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> >>>> > From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
>> >>>> <ma...@apache.org>>
>> >>>> > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
>> >>>> > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at
>> daemon
>> >>>> thread in tomcat
>> >>>> > To: <dev@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
>> dev@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Please read my previous response and follow the
>> >>>> instructions you were given.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Mark
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> >>>> >> Hi All,
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the
>> pull
>> >>>> request as I have
>> >>>> >> been trying to give the change at latest.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> regards,
>> >>>> >> Koti
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas
>> >>>> <markt@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be
>> added at
>> >>>> Github
>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request
>> >>>> creation failed.
>> >>>> >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat
>> >>>> repository. The only
>> >>>> >>> exception is users who have been blocked for
>> >>> spam/abuse.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for
>> >>>> providing the solution
>> >>>> > for
>> >>>> >>>> daemon thread performance issue
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the
>> proposed
>> >>> fix.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Please also provide a better description of the
>> problem
>> >>>> you are trying
>> >>>> >>> to solve.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Mark
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread
>> >>>> activity, and it's
>> >>>> >>> taking
>> >>>> >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat
>> launch.
>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is
>> just
>> >>>> like
>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the
>> daemon
>> >>>> thread startup.
>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>> Regards,
>> >>>> >>>> Koti
>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >>>> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>> >>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
>> >>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >>> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>> >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
>> >>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
I am going to provide unit tests through which I identifies the performance
issue at core JVM method
Let me provide this
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, 21:15 Christopher Schultz, <
chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/15/24 03:45, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Jan 2024, 18:13 koteswara Rao Gundapaneni, <
> > koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> hi
> >>
> >> Daemon threads have identified the performance issue inorder to
> complete .
> >>
> >
> >
> > Thread which is set as daemon by default has performance bottleneck
> >
> > I explain that as below
> >
> > myeg.setDaemon(true);
> > myeg.start();
> >
> >
> > the above start() method is taking long time to complete which is by
> > default performance bottleneck
>
> The Thread.start() method is not something under the control of the
> Apache Tomcat team. That is a core JVM method.
>
> >> so bootstrap has its performance issue as this loader thread is using
> >> daemon thread.
> >>
> >
> >
> > In our code base we have lot of places where we have the code as below as
> > mentioned above.
> >
> > myeg.setDaemon(true);
> > myeg.start();
>
> Whose code is "our code"?
>
> >> inorder to resolve the issue we will yield the corresponding thread
> >>
> >
> >
> > Inorder to limit the time taking for above line of code we have the
> > solution like below
> >
> > myeg.setDaemon(true);
> > myeg.start();
> > myeg.yield();
>
> How can a call to Thread.yield() which is made *after* a call to
> Thread.start() make the call to Thread.start() execute more quickly?
>
> Here is the documentation for Thread.yield (with emphasis added by me):
>
> "
> A hint to the scheduler that the current thread is willing to yield its
> current use of a processor. **The scheduler is free to ignore this hint.**
>
> Yield is a heuristic attempt to improve relative progression between
> threads that would otherwise over-utilise a CPU. Its use should be
> combined with detailed profiling and benchmarking to ensure that it
> actually has the desired effect.
>
> **It is rarely appropriate to use this method.** It may be useful for
> debugging or testing purposes, where it may help to reproduce bugs due
> to race conditions. It may also be useful when designing concurrency
> control constructs such as the ones in the java.util.concurrent.locks
> package.
> "
>
> Note that calling someOtherThread.yield() actually causes the current
> thread (e.g. Main in your likely example) to yield, rather than
> instructing someOtherThread to yield.
>
> If this is intentional, it looks like what you are trying to do is
> instruct the current thread to cause Thread called "myeg" (aka
> someOtherThread) to start and then to immediate yield the current
> thread's time back to the scheduler.
>
> This should not be necessary.
>
> > the yield method declared as above will reduce the time taking for start
> > method
> >
> >
> >
> > Hope this will make sense if not I will write it in my own language
> telugu.
>
> I get the idea you are trying to convey, but it does not make much
> technical sense to me.
>
> Your code for Bootstrap.start() is using reflection to invoke
> Catalina.start from your main thread. But you are not running any of
> your own code in any non-main thread, so of course the call to
> Catalina.start is taking "a long time": there is a lot of work to be
> done to bring a server online.
>
> If you want your main thread to continue while Catalina is starting,
> then you should run that in a separate thread. For example:
>
> new Thread(r -> catalina.start()).start();
>
> If you think there is a performance problem in Apache Tomcat, the best
> way to demonstrate it is with a Unit Test which reproduces the problem.
>
> What you are presenting appears to be either a misunderstanding of
> threading in Java or a misuse of Tomcat's Catalina class.
>
> If you are concerned with performance, you might want to use less
> reflection in your code, since it's very slow compared to direct method
> invocations.
>
> -chris
>
> >> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 4:13 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> You have yet to provide an explanation of the problem you are trying to
> >>> solve.
> >>>
> >>> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further
> messages
> >>> from you on this topic will be ignored.
> >>>
> >>> Mark
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 14/01/2024 12:05, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >>>> hi team
> >>>>
> >>>> before clicking the link or check new private window in mozilla
> >>>>
> >>>> image.png
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> when we browse the following link
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >>> <
> >>>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> image.png
> >>>>
> >>>> Here the code page is shown as above
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:41 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
> >>>> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> hi mark,
> >>>>
> >>>> please check if the code is now available at your end I verified
> >>>> from my end it can be visible
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
> >>>> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just
> now
> >>>> i committed my changes to a new public repo
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >>> <
> >>>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Please find my attested changes in whole file
> 'Bootstrap.java'.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <
> markt@apache.org
> >>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >>>> > Hi Team,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my
> >>>> branch along with the
> >>>> > pr created,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Comparing
> >>> singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
> >>>> > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com
> >>>> <http://github.com>)
> >>>> >
> >>>> <
> >>>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
> >>> <
> >>>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> That URI returns a 404.
> >>>>
> >>>> Unless and until you provide the information requested,
> >>>> further messages
> >>>> from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mark
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >>>> > From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
> >>>> <ma...@apache.org>>
> >>>> > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
> >>>> > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon
> >>>> thread in tomcat
> >>>> > To: <dev@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
> dev@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Please read my previous response and follow the
> >>>> instructions you were given.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Mark
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >>>> >> Hi All,
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull
> >>>> request as I have
> >>>> >> been trying to give the change at latest.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> regards,
> >>>> >> Koti
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas
> >>>> <markt@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
> wrote:
> >>>> >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be
> added at
> >>>> Github
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request
> >>>> creation failed.
> >>>> >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat
> >>>> repository. The only
> >>>> >>> exception is users who have been blocked for
> >>> spam/abuse.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for
> >>>> providing the solution
> >>>> > for
> >>>> >>>> daemon thread performance issue
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the
> proposed
> >>> fix.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Please also provide a better description of the
> problem
> >>>> you are trying
> >>>> >>> to solve.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Mark
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread
> >>>> activity, and it's
> >>>> >>> taking
> >>>> >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat
> launch.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is
> just
> >>>> like
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the
> daemon
> >>>> thread startup.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> >>>> Koti
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
> >>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
> >>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
Hello,
On 1/15/24 03:45, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2024, 18:13 koteswara Rao Gundapaneni, <
> koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> hi
>>
>> Daemon threads have identified the performance issue inorder to complete .
>>
>
>
> Thread which is set as daemon by default has performance bottleneck
>
> I explain that as below
>
> myeg.setDaemon(true);
> myeg.start();
>
>
> the above start() method is taking long time to complete which is by
> default performance bottleneck
The Thread.start() method is not something under the control of the
Apache Tomcat team. That is a core JVM method.
>> so bootstrap has its performance issue as this loader thread is using
>> daemon thread.
>>
>
>
> In our code base we have lot of places where we have the code as below as
> mentioned above.
>
> myeg.setDaemon(true);
> myeg.start();
Whose code is "our code"?
>> inorder to resolve the issue we will yield the corresponding thread
>>
>
>
> Inorder to limit the time taking for above line of code we have the
> solution like below
>
> myeg.setDaemon(true);
> myeg.start();
> myeg.yield();
How can a call to Thread.yield() which is made *after* a call to
Thread.start() make the call to Thread.start() execute more quickly?
Here is the documentation for Thread.yield (with emphasis added by me):
"
A hint to the scheduler that the current thread is willing to yield its
current use of a processor. **The scheduler is free to ignore this hint.**
Yield is a heuristic attempt to improve relative progression between
threads that would otherwise over-utilise a CPU. Its use should be
combined with detailed profiling and benchmarking to ensure that it
actually has the desired effect.
**It is rarely appropriate to use this method.** It may be useful for
debugging or testing purposes, where it may help to reproduce bugs due
to race conditions. It may also be useful when designing concurrency
control constructs such as the ones in the java.util.concurrent.locks
package.
"
Note that calling someOtherThread.yield() actually causes the current
thread (e.g. Main in your likely example) to yield, rather than
instructing someOtherThread to yield.
If this is intentional, it looks like what you are trying to do is
instruct the current thread to cause Thread called "myeg" (aka
someOtherThread) to start and then to immediate yield the current
thread's time back to the scheduler.
This should not be necessary.
> the yield method declared as above will reduce the time taking for start
> method
>
>
>
> Hope this will make sense if not I will write it in my own language telugu.
I get the idea you are trying to convey, but it does not make much
technical sense to me.
Your code for Bootstrap.start() is using reflection to invoke
Catalina.start from your main thread. But you are not running any of
your own code in any non-main thread, so of course the call to
Catalina.start is taking "a long time": there is a lot of work to be
done to bring a server online.
If you want your main thread to continue while Catalina is starting,
then you should run that in a separate thread. For example:
new Thread(r -> catalina.start()).start();
If you think there is a performance problem in Apache Tomcat, the best
way to demonstrate it is with a Unit Test which reproduces the problem.
What you are presenting appears to be either a misunderstanding of
threading in Java or a misuse of Tomcat's Catalina class.
If you are concerned with performance, you might want to use less
reflection in your code, since it's very slow compared to direct method
invocations.
-chris
>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 4:13 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> You have yet to provide an explanation of the problem you are trying to
>>> solve.
>>>
>>> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
>>> from you on this topic will be ignored.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/01/2024 12:05, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>>> hi team
>>>>
>>>> before clicking the link or check new private window in mozilla
>>>>
>>>> image.png
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> when we browse the following link
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>>> <
>>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> image.png
>>>>
>>>> Here the code page is shown as above
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:41 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
>>>> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hi mark,
>>>>
>>>> please check if the code is now available at your end I verified
>>>> from my end it can be visible
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
>>>> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just now
>>>> i committed my changes to a new public repo
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>>> <
>>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please find my attested changes in whole file 'Bootstrap.java'.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>>> > Hi Team,
>>>> >
>>>> > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my
>>>> branch along with the
>>>> > pr created,
>>>> >
>>>> > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
>>>> >
>>>> > Comparing
>>> singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
>>>> > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com
>>>> <http://github.com>)
>>>> >
>>>> <
>>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>>> <
>>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That URI returns a 404.
>>>>
>>>> Unless and until you provide the information requested,
>>>> further messages
>>>> from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>> > From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
>>>> <ma...@apache.org>>
>>>> > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
>>>> > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon
>>>> thread in tomcat
>>>> > To: <dev@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Please read my previous response and follow the
>>>> instructions you were given.
>>>> >
>>>> > Mark
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>>> >> Hi All,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull
>>>> request as I have
>>>> >> been trying to give the change at latest.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> regards,
>>>> >> Koti
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas
>>>> <markt@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>>> >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at
>>>> Github
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request
>>>> creation failed.
>>>> >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat
>>>> repository. The only
>>>> >>> exception is users who have been blocked for
>>> spam/abuse.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for
>>>> providing the solution
>>>> > for
>>>> >>>> daemon thread performance issue
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed
>>> fix.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Please also provide a better description of the problem
>>>> you are trying
>>>> >>> to solve.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Mark
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread
>>>> activity, and it's
>>>> >>> taking
>>>> >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just
>>>> like
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon
>>>> thread startup.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Regards,
>>>> >>>> Koti
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
>>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>>> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi Koti,
There is not much between a daemon and not daemon thread in the JVM so
until you:
* start tomcat in an already (over)loaded environment (OSGi, multi-server
instances)
or
* have some agent or plugin using AttachCurrentThreadAsDaemon extension
point
there is no reason using yield would help.
So high level I think it makes sense for you to create instructions to
reproduce the issue (you create a github repository with scripts or a
readme to explain how to evaluate and identity this slowness for anyone
willing to help on this topic) cause technically it looks like you don't
fix the root cause of your issue but a side effect.
Regards,
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le lun. 15 janv. 2024 à 09:45, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <
koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2024, 18:13 koteswara Rao Gundapaneni, <
> koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > hi
> >
> > Daemon threads have identified the performance issue inorder to complete
> .
> >
>
>
> Thread which is set as daemon by default has performance bottleneck
>
> I explain that as below
>
> myeg.setDaemon(true);
> myeg.start();
>
>
> the above start() method is taking long time to complete which is by
> default performance bottleneck
>
> >
> > so bootstrap has its performance issue as this loader thread is using
> > daemon thread.
> >
>
>
> In our code base we have lot of places where we have the code as below as
> mentioned above.
>
> myeg.setDaemon(true);
> myeg.start();
>
> >
> > inorder to resolve the issue we will yield the corresponding thread
> >
>
>
> Inorder to limit the time taking for above line of code we have the
> solution like below
>
> myeg.setDaemon(true);
> myeg.start();
> myeg.yield();
>
>
> the yield method declared as above will reduce the time taking for start
> method
>
>
>
> Hope this will make sense if not I will write it in my own language telugu.
>
>
>
> regards,
> > koti
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 4:13 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> You have yet to provide an explanation of the problem you are trying to
> >> solve.
> >>
> >> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
> >> from you on this topic will be ignored.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>
> >> On 14/01/2024 12:05, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >> > hi team
> >> >
> >> > before clicking the link or check new private window in mozilla
> >> >
> >> > image.png
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > when we browse the following link
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >> <
> >>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > image.png
> >> >
> >> > Here the code page is shown as above
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:41 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
> >> > <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > hi mark,
> >> >
> >> > please check if the code is now available at your end I verified
> >> > from my end it can be visible
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
> >> > <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just
> now
> >> > i committed my changes to a new public repo
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >> <
> >>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Please find my attested changes in whole file
> 'Bootstrap.java'.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <
> markt@apache.org
> >> > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >> > > Hi Team,
> >> > >
> >> > > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my
> >> > branch along with the
> >> > > pr created,
> >> > >
> >> > > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
> >> > >
> >> > > Comparing
> >> singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
> >> > > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com
> >> > <http://github.com>)
> >> > >
> >> > <
> >>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
> >> <
> >>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > That URI returns a 404.
> >> >
> >> > Unless and until you provide the information requested,
> >> > further messages
> >> > from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
> >> >
> >> > Mark
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >> > > From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
> >> > <ma...@apache.org>>
> >> > > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
> >> > > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon
> >> > thread in tomcat
> >> > > To: <dev@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
> dev@tomcat.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Please read my previous response and follow the
> >> > instructions you were given.
> >> > >
> >> > > Mark
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >> > >> Hi All,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull
> >> > request as I have
> >> > >> been trying to give the change at latest.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> regards,
> >> > >> Koti
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas
> >> > <markt@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >> > >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added
> at
> >> > Github
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request
> >> > creation failed.
> >> > >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat
> >> > repository. The only
> >> > >>> exception is users who have been blocked for
> >> spam/abuse.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for
> >> > providing the solution
> >> > > for
> >> > >>>> daemon thread performance issue
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the
> proposed
> >> fix.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Please also provide a better description of the
> problem
> >> > you are trying
> >> > >>> to solve.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Mark
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread
> >> > activity, and it's
> >> > >>> taking
> >> > >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is
> just
> >> > like
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the
> daemon
> >> > thread startup.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Regards,
> >> > >>>> Koti
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> > dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> >> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> > dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
> >> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> >> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> > dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
> >> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> >> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> >> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, 14 Jan 2024, 18:13 koteswara Rao Gundapaneni, <
koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi
>
> Daemon threads have identified the performance issue inorder to complete .
>
Thread which is set as daemon by default has performance bottleneck
I explain that as below
myeg.setDaemon(true);
myeg.start();
the above start() method is taking long time to complete which is by
default performance bottleneck
>
> so bootstrap has its performance issue as this loader thread is using
> daemon thread.
>
In our code base we have lot of places where we have the code as below as
mentioned above.
myeg.setDaemon(true);
myeg.start();
>
> inorder to resolve the issue we will yield the corresponding thread
>
Inorder to limit the time taking for above line of code we have the
solution like below
myeg.setDaemon(true);
myeg.start();
myeg.yield();
the yield method declared as above will reduce the time taking for start
method
Hope this will make sense if not I will write it in my own language telugu.
regards,
> koti
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 4:13 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> You have yet to provide an explanation of the problem you are trying to
>> solve.
>>
>> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
>> from you on this topic will be ignored.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> On 14/01/2024 12:05, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> > hi team
>> >
>> > before clicking the link or check new private window in mozilla
>> >
>> > image.png
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > when we browse the following link
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> <
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > image.png
>> >
>> > Here the code page is shown as above
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:41 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
>> > <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > hi mark,
>> >
>> > please check if the code is now available at your end I verified
>> > from my end it can be visible
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
>> > <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just now
>> > i committed my changes to a new public repo
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> <
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>> >
>> >
>> > Please find my attested changes in whole file 'Bootstrap.java'.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
>> > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> > > Hi Team,
>> > >
>> > > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my
>> > branch along with the
>> > > pr created,
>> > >
>> > > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
>> > >
>> > > Comparing
>> singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
>> > > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com
>> > <http://github.com>)
>> > >
>> > <
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>> <
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>> >>
>> >
>> > That URI returns a 404.
>> >
>> > Unless and until you provide the information requested,
>> > further messages
>> > from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> > > From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
>> > <ma...@apache.org>>
>> > > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
>> > > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon
>> > thread in tomcat
>> > > To: <dev@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Please read my previous response and follow the
>> > instructions you were given.
>> > >
>> > > Mark
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> > >> Hi All,
>> > >>
>> > >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull
>> > request as I have
>> > >> been trying to give the change at latest.
>> > >>
>> > >> regards,
>> > >> Koti
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas
>> > <markt@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> > >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at
>> > Github
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request
>> > creation failed.
>> > >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat
>> > repository. The only
>> > >>> exception is users who have been blocked for
>> spam/abuse.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for
>> > providing the solution
>> > > for
>> > >>>> daemon thread performance issue
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed
>> fix.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Please also provide a better description of the problem
>> > you are trying
>> > >>> to solve.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Mark
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread
>> > activity, and it's
>> > >>> taking
>> > >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just
>> > like
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon
>> > thread startup.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Regards,
>> > >>>> Koti
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> > dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
>> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
hi
Daemon threads have identified the performance issue inorder to complete .
so bootstrap has its performance issue as this loader thread is using
daemon thread.
inorder to resolve the issue we will yield the corresponding thread
regards,
koti
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 4:13 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> You have yet to provide an explanation of the problem you are trying to
> solve.
>
> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
> from you on this topic will be ignored.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 14/01/2024 12:05, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > hi team
> >
> > before clicking the link or check new private window in mozilla
> >
> > image.png
> >
> >
> >
> > when we browse the following link
> >
> >
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> <
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >
> >
> >
> > image.png
> >
> > Here the code page is shown as above
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:41 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
> > <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > hi mark,
> >
> > please check if the code is now available at your end I verified
> > from my end it can be visible
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
> > <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just now
> > i committed my changes to a new public repo
> >
> >
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> <
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
> >
> >
> > Please find my attested changes in whole file 'Bootstrap.java'.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
> > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my
> > branch along with the
> > > pr created,
> > >
> > > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
> > >
> > > Comparing singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
> ·
> > > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com
> > <http://github.com>)
> > >
> > <
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
> <
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
> >>
> >
> > That URI returns a 404.
> >
> > Unless and until you provide the information requested,
> > further messages
> > from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > > From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
> > <ma...@apache.org>>
> > > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon
> > thread in tomcat
> > > To: <dev@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org
> >>
> > >
> > >
> > > Please read my previous response and follow the
> > instructions you were given.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull
> > request as I have
> > >> been trying to give the change at latest.
> > >>
> > >> regards,
> > >> Koti
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas
> > <markt@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at
> > Github
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request
> > creation failed.
> > >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
> > >>>
> > >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat
> > repository. The only
> > >>> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
> > >>>
> > >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for
> > providing the solution
> > > for
> > >>>> daemon thread performance issue
> > >>>
> > >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed
> fix.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please also provide a better description of the problem
> > you are trying
> > >>> to solve.
> > >>>
> > >>> Mark
> > >>>
> > >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread
> > activity, and it's
> > >>> taking
> > >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just
> > like
> > >>>>
> > >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon
> > thread startup.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Koti
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <mailto:
> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
> > >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> > <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
You have yet to provide an explanation of the problem you are trying to
solve.
Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
from you on this topic will be ignored.
Mark
On 14/01/2024 12:05, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> hi team
>
> before clicking the link or check new private window in mozilla
>
> image.png
>
>
>
> when we browse the following link
>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master <https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master>
>
>
> image.png
>
> Here the code page is shown as above
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:41 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> hi mark,
>
> please check if the code is now available at your end I verified
> from my end it can be visible
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni
> <koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just now
> i committed my changes to a new public repo
>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master <https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master>
>
> Please find my attested changes in whole file 'Bootstrap.java'.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my
> branch along with the
> > pr created,
> >
> > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
> >
> > Comparing singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
> > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com
> <http://github.com>)
> >
> <https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 <https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1>>
>
> That URI returns a 404.
>
> Unless and until you provide the information requested,
> further messages
> from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>>
> > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon
> thread in tomcat
> > To: <dev@tomcat.apache.org <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>>
> >
> >
> > Please read my previous response and follow the
> instructions you were given.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull
> request as I have
> >> been trying to give the change at latest.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Koti
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas
> <markt@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at
> Github
> >>>>
> >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request
> creation failed.
> >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
> >>>
> >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat
> repository. The only
> >>> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
> >>>
> >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for
> providing the solution
> > for
> >>>> daemon thread performance issue
> >>>
> >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
> >>>
> >>> Please also provide a better description of the problem
> you are trying
> >>> to solve.
> >>>
> >>> Mark
> >>>
> >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread
> activity, and it's
> >>> taking
> >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just
> like
> >>>>
> >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon
> thread startup.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Koti
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@tomcat.apache.org <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> <ma...@tomcat.apache.org>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
hi team
before clicking the link or check new private window in mozilla
[image: image.png]
when we browse the following link
https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
[image: image.png]
Here the code page is shown as above
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:41 PM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <
koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hi mark,
>
> please check if the code is now available at your end I verified from my
> end it can be visible
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <
> koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just now i
>> committed my changes to a new public repo
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>>
>> Please find my attested changes in whole file 'Bootstrap.java'.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>> > Hi Team,
>>> >
>>> > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my branch along with
>>> the
>>> > pr created,
>>> >
>>> > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
>>> >
>>> > Comparing singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
>>> > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com)
>>> > <
>>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>>> >
>>>
>>> That URI returns a 404.
>>>
>>> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
>>> from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> > From: Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>>> > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
>>> > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
>>> > To: <de...@tomcat.apache.org>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Please read my previous response and follow the instructions you were
>>> given.
>>> >
>>> > Mark
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>> >> Hi All,
>>> >>
>>> >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull request as I
>>> have
>>> >> been trying to give the change at latest.
>>> >>
>>> >> regards,
>>> >> Koti
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>> >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
>>> >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat repository. The only
>>> >>> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the
>>> solution
>>> > for
>>> >>>> daemon thread performance issue
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please also provide a better description of the problem you are
>>> trying
>>> >>> to solve.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Mark
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's
>>> >>> taking
>>> >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread
>>> startup.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Regards,
>>> >>>> Koti
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>>
>>>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
hi mark,
please check if the code is now available at your end I verified from my
end it can be visible
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 1:28 AM koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <
koti.gundapaneni@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just now i
> committed my changes to a new public repo
>
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
>
> Please find my attested changes in whole file 'Bootstrap.java'.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> > Hi Team,
>> >
>> > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my branch along with
>> the
>> > pr created,
>> >
>> > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
>> >
>> > Comparing singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
>> > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com)
>> > <
>> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
>> >
>>
>> That URI returns a 404.
>>
>> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
>> from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> > From: Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>> > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
>> > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
>> > To: <de...@tomcat.apache.org>
>> >
>> >
>> > Please read my previous response and follow the instructions you were
>> given.
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >
>> >
>> > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull request as I have
>> >> been trying to give the change at latest.
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >> Koti
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
>> >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat repository. The only
>> >>> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
>> >>>
>> >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the solution
>> > for
>> >>>> daemon thread performance issue
>> >>>
>> >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
>> >>>
>> >>> Please also provide a better description of the problem you are trying
>> >>> to solve.
>> >>>
>> >>> Mark
>> >>>
>> >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's
>> >>> taking
>> >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
>> >>>>
>> >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread
>> startup.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Regards,
>> >>>> Koti
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
Sorry for the inconvenience as its been a private repo just now i committed
my changes to a new public repo
https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/KotiSpringRepository/tree/master
Please find my attested changes in whole file 'Bootstrap.java'.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > As its milestone contribution for me I have added my branch along with
> the
> > pr created,
> >
> > Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
> >
> > Comparing singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
> > KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com)
> > <
> https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1
> >
>
> That URI returns a 404.
>
> Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
> from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
> > Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
> > To: <de...@tomcat.apache.org>
> >
> >
> > Please read my previous response and follow the instructions you were
> given.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull request as I have
> >> been trying to give the change at latest.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Koti
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> >>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
> >>>>
> >>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
> >>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
> >>>
> >>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat repository. The only
> >>> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
> >>>
> >>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the solution
> > for
> >>>> daemon thread performance issue
> >>>
> >>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
> >>>
> >>> Please also provide a better description of the problem you are trying
> >>> to solve.
> >>>
> >>> Mark
> >>>
> >>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's
> >>> taking
> >>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
> >>>>
> >>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread startup.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Koti
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 12/01/2024 08:16, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> As its milestone contribution for me I have added my branch along with the
> pr created,
>
> Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
>
> Comparing singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
> KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com)
> <https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1>
That URI returns a 404.
Unless and until you provide the information requested, further messages
from you on this topic are likely to be ignored.
Mark
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
> Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
> Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
> To: <de...@tomcat.apache.org>
>
>
> Please read my previous response and follow the instructions you were given.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull request as I have
>> been trying to give the change at latest.
>>
>> regards,
>> Koti
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
>>>>
>>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
>>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>>>
>>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat repository. The only
>>> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
>>>
>>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the solution
> for
>>>> daemon thread performance issue
>>>
>>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
>>>
>>> Please also provide a better description of the problem you are trying
>>> to solve.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's
>>> taking
>>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
>>>>
>>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
>>>>
>>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread startup.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Koti
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
Hi Team,
As its milestone contribution for me I have added my branch along with the
pr created,
Please add the reviewer here to commit the changes.
Comparing singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1 ·
KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO (github.com)
<https://github.com/KoteswararaoGundapaneni/MYREPO/compare/singlemanager...KoteswararaoGundapaneni-patch-1>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
Date: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
To: <de...@tomcat.apache.org>
Please read my previous response and follow the instructions you were given.
Mark
On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull request as I have
> been trying to give the change at latest.
>
> regards,
> Koti
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
>>>
>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>>
>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat repository. The only
>> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
>>
>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the solution
for
>>> daemon thread performance issue
>>
>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
>>
>> Please also provide a better description of the problem you are trying
>> to solve.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's
>> taking
>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
>>>
>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
>>>
>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread startup.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Koti
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
Please read my previous response and follow the instructions you were given.
Mark
On 06/01/2024 06:26, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull request as I have
> been trying to give the change at latest.
>
> regards,
> Koti
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
>>> It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
>>>
>>> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
>>> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>>
>> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat repository. The only
>> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
>>
>>> Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the solution for
>>> daemon thread performance issue
>>
>> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
>>
>> Please also provide a better description of the problem you are trying
>> to solve.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>> daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's
>> taking
>>> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
>>>
>>> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
>>>
>>> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread startup.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Koti
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
Somebody helps to give permissions to create the pull request as I have
been trying to give the change at latest.
regards,
Koti
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
> >
> > *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
> > Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>
> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat repository. The only
> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
>
> > Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the solution for
> > daemon thread performance issue
>
> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
>
> Please also provide a better description of the problem you are trying
> to solve.
>
> Mark
>
> > daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's
> taking
> > significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
> >
> > Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
> >
> > yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread startup.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Koti
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by koteswara Rao Gundapaneni <ko...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
Somebody helps here
It's daemon thread launch issue the problem I noticed here is it taking a
long time to complete
daemon.setDaemon(true);
daemon.start();
line number 2 has the issue
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, 13:42 Mark Thomas, <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
> >
> > *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
> > Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
>
> Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat repository. The only
> exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
>
> > Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the solution for
> > daemon thread performance issue
>
> Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
>
> Please also provide a better description of the problem you are trying
> to solve.
>
> Mark
>
> > daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's
> taking
> > significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
> >
> > Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
> >
> > yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread startup.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Koti
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
Re: Supposed to provide performance at daemon thread in tomcat
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 05/01/2024 05:15, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> It seems there are further permissions to be added at Github
>
> *Error received via Github is as : **Pull request creation failed.
> Validation failed: must be a collaborator*
Anyone can submit a pull request to the Tomcat repository. The only
exception is users who have been blocked for spam/abuse.
> Actually i tried creating the pull request for providing the solution for
> daemon thread performance issue
Please provide a link to your branch with the proposed fix.
Please also provide a better description of the problem you are trying
to solve.
Mark
> daemonthread background processing of the thread activity, and it's taking
> significant amount of time during the tomcat launch.
>
> Simple hint over the next step of the solution is just like
>
> yield() provides the greater performance to the daemon thread startup.
>
>
> Regards,
> Koti
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org