You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@esme.apache.org by Uday Subbarayan <ud...@yahoo.com> on 2010/02/05 04:46:40 UTC
Class Diagram
Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
Thanks,
Uday.
-------------------------
I do not blog but e-write:
http://uds-web.blogspot.com
Re: Class Diagram
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
If you are looking for developers with Scala and/or lift experience,
I'd suggest asking on the lift list
(http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?pli=1). It is a very active
list or ask David Pollack directly.
If you wish, I can introduce you to David.
D.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Uday Subbarayan
<ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Ethan,
> Thanks. I am not wed to any one language/platform. But when designing new products, I need to understand the pros & cons of each & well.
>
> As I said, I like ESME.But forming an engineering team with Scala expertise is going to be challenging.
>
> Best,
> -Uday.
>
> -------------------------
>
> I do not blog but e-write:
>
> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>
> --- On Sat, 2/6/10, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 5:40 PM
>
> Hi Uday,
>
> It is complicated, isn't it :-) Scala has some conventions that were a
> bit confusing for me, coming from other pure object-oriented and
> functional languages. None of those languages were Java, so that may
> have been part of the problem :-) In order to pick up ESME, I found
> it very helpful to first read a complete introductory Scala book.
>
> However, the real point of this email is a word of warning: If you are
> trying to understand ESME from the angle of the class hierarchy, you
> aren't going to get there. The reason is that ESME is a messaging
> system and for pretty much all message operations ESME uses an actor
> model to manage interactions in a scalable manner.
>
> Understanding the classes (under the "model" folder) will help you
> understand the objects ESME uses, but you'll have to understand the
> actors (in the "actor" folder) in order to see how ESME does anything
> with these objects. I started a basic diagram of the actor model ESME
> uses on the wiki, which you might find helpful:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ESME/Actor+Model
>
> Cheers!
> Ethan
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Uday Subbarayan
> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I totally agree with you- this is not the place to discuss about language..
>>
>> I was trying to learn internals of ESME and as you said, this is very complicated code. I also noticed some 40+ jar's are included in the war!!
>>
>> I like ESME and if i can't learn the code structure, then it will be risk to use in a product. Maintenance will be challenging. I am looking around to see if i can find a light weight ESME or roll up my own.
>>
>> Best,
>> Uday.
>>
>> -------------------------
>>
>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>
>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>
>> --- On Sat, 2/6/10, Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 7:46 AM
>>
>> Regarding the UML diagram, if code is gerenated from the UML, then it
>> *might* make sense. If not, practice shows that the diagram will be
>> always outdated.
>>
>> Analyzing Scala code is fairly complicated because of Scala's
>> extensibility. Besides, Scala is evolving fast and the syntax is a
>> moving target. I doubt there are any tools which can generate an UML
>> diagram from Scala code.
>>
>> As for opinions about the Scala language, Richard is right- this is
>> not the rigth place to discuss language viability. Most folks
>> concentrate on an in-depth analysis of what features they don't like
>> in Scala rather than trying to guess whether Scala will succeed. Note
>> that many people claimed that Java would be a failure some 10-15 years
>> ago- these things are not easy to predict.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Uday Subbarayan
>>> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Ok. I like the high level design of ESME. It's a good product.
>>>>
>>>> Since it's written in Scala, I don't know the internals. I don't even know whether Scala can survive in the long run. I just wrote a blog about it-
>>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com/2010/02/what-is-scala.html
>>>
>>> If you have questions about scala and its merits, I'd suggest looking
>>> here: http://www.scala-lang.org/. There are a series of excellent
>>> blogs about the new language and a comparison with other languages.
>>> One of the advantages is its compactness.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> -Uday.
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------
>>>>
>>>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>>>
>>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>> --- On Fri, 2/5/10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 6:15 AM
>>>>
>>>> Not yet. Definitely would be good to have.
>>>>
>>>> I'll look for some tool that generates a class diagram from existing scala code
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Uday Subbarayan
>>>> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Uday.
>>>>>
>>>>> -------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Class Diagram
Posted by Uday Subbarayan <ud...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Ethan,
Thanks. I am not wed to any one language/platform. But when designing new products, I need to understand the pros & cons of each & well.
As I said, I like ESME.But forming an engineering team with Scala expertise is going to be challenging.
Best,
-Uday.
-------------------------
I do not blog but e-write:
http://uds-web.blogspot.com
--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Class Diagram
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 5:40 PM
Hi Uday,
It is complicated, isn't it :-) Scala has some conventions that were a
bit confusing for me, coming from other pure object-oriented and
functional languages. None of those languages were Java, so that may
have been part of the problem :-) In order to pick up ESME, I found
it very helpful to first read a complete introductory Scala book.
However, the real point of this email is a word of warning: If you are
trying to understand ESME from the angle of the class hierarchy, you
aren't going to get there. The reason is that ESME is a messaging
system and for pretty much all message operations ESME uses an actor
model to manage interactions in a scalable manner.
Understanding the classes (under the "model" folder) will help you
understand the objects ESME uses, but you'll have to understand the
actors (in the "actor" folder) in order to see how ESME does anything
with these objects. I started a basic diagram of the actor model ESME
uses on the wiki, which you might find helpful:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ESME/Actor+Model
Cheers!
Ethan
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Uday Subbarayan
<ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I totally agree with you- this is not the place to discuss about language..
>
> I was trying to learn internals of ESME and as you said, this is very complicated code. I also noticed some 40+ jar's are included in the war!!
>
> I like ESME and if i can't learn the code structure, then it will be risk to use in a product. Maintenance will be challenging. I am looking around to see if i can find a light weight ESME or roll up my own.
>
> Best,
> Uday.
>
> -------------------------
>
> I do not blog but e-write:
>
> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>
> --- On Sat, 2/6/10, Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> From: Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 7:46 AM
>
> Regarding the UML diagram, if code is gerenated from the UML, then it
> *might* make sense. If not, practice shows that the diagram will be
> always outdated.
>
> Analyzing Scala code is fairly complicated because of Scala's
> extensibility. Besides, Scala is evolving fast and the syntax is a
> moving target. I doubt there are any tools which can generate an UML
> diagram from Scala code.
>
> As for opinions about the Scala language, Richard is right- this is
> not the rigth place to discuss language viability. Most folks
> concentrate on an in-depth analysis of what features they don't like
> in Scala rather than trying to guess whether Scala will succeed. Note
> that many people claimed that Java would be a failure some 10-15 years
> ago- these things are not easy to predict.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Uday Subbarayan
>> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Ok. I like the high level design of ESME. It's a good product.
>>>
>>> Since it's written in Scala, I don't know the internals. I don't even know whether Scala can survive in the long run. I just wrote a blog about it-
>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com/2010/02/what-is-scala.html
>>
>> If you have questions about scala and its merits, I'd suggest looking
>> here: http://www.scala-lang.org/. There are a series of excellent
>> blogs about the new language and a comparison with other languages.
>> One of the advantages is its compactness.
>>
>> D.
>>
>>> Best,
>>> -Uday.
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>>
>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> --- On Fri, 2/5/10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 6:15 AM
>>>
>>> Not yet. Definitely would be good to have.
>>>
>>> I'll look for some tool that generates a class diagram from existing scala code
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Uday Subbarayan
>>> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Uday.
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------
>>>>
>>>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>>>
>>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Class Diagram
Posted by Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>.
Hi Uday,
It is complicated, isn't it :-) Scala has some conventions that were a
bit confusing for me, coming from other pure object-oriented and
functional languages. None of those languages were Java, so that may
have been part of the problem :-) In order to pick up ESME, I found
it very helpful to first read a complete introductory Scala book.
However, the real point of this email is a word of warning: If you are
trying to understand ESME from the angle of the class hierarchy, you
aren't going to get there. The reason is that ESME is a messaging
system and for pretty much all message operations ESME uses an actor
model to manage interactions in a scalable manner.
Understanding the classes (under the "model" folder) will help you
understand the objects ESME uses, but you'll have to understand the
actors (in the "actor" folder) in order to see how ESME does anything
with these objects. I started a basic diagram of the actor model ESME
uses on the wiki, which you might find helpful:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ESME/Actor+Model
Cheers!
Ethan
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Uday Subbarayan
<ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I totally agree with you- this is not the place to discuss about language.
>
> I was trying to learn internals of ESME and as you said, this is very complicated code. I also noticed some 40+ jar's are included in the war!!
>
> I like ESME and if i can't learn the code structure, then it will be risk to use in a product. Maintenance will be challenging. I am looking around to see if i can find a light weight ESME or roll up my own.
>
> Best,
> Uday.
>
> -------------------------
>
> I do not blog but e-write:
>
> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>
> --- On Sat, 2/6/10, Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> From: Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 7:46 AM
>
> Regarding the UML diagram, if code is gerenated from the UML, then it
> *might* make sense. If not, practice shows that the diagram will be
> always outdated.
>
> Analyzing Scala code is fairly complicated because of Scala's
> extensibility. Besides, Scala is evolving fast and the syntax is a
> moving target. I doubt there are any tools which can generate an UML
> diagram from Scala code.
>
> As for opinions about the Scala language, Richard is right- this is
> not the rigth place to discuss language viability. Most folks
> concentrate on an in-depth analysis of what features they don't like
> in Scala rather than trying to guess whether Scala will succeed. Note
> that many people claimed that Java would be a failure some 10-15 years
> ago- these things are not easy to predict.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Uday Subbarayan
>> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Ok. I like the high level design of ESME. It's a good product.
>>>
>>> Since it's written in Scala, I don't know the internals. I don't even know whether Scala can survive in the long run. I just wrote a blog about it-
>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com/2010/02/what-is-scala.html
>>
>> If you have questions about scala and its merits, I'd suggest looking
>> here: http://www.scala-lang.org/. There are a series of excellent
>> blogs about the new language and a comparison with other languages.
>> One of the advantages is its compactness.
>>
>> D.
>>
>>> Best,
>>> -Uday.
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>>
>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> --- On Fri, 2/5/10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 6:15 AM
>>>
>>> Not yet. Definitely would be good to have.
>>>
>>> I'll look for some tool that generates a class diagram from existing scala code
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Uday Subbarayan
>>> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Uday.
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------
>>>>
>>>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>>>
>>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Class Diagram
Posted by Uday Subbarayan <ud...@yahoo.com>.
I totally agree with you- this is not the place to discuss about language.
I was trying to learn internals of ESME and as you said, this is very complicated code. I also noticed some 40+ jar's are included in the war!!
I like ESME and if i can't learn the code structure, then it will be risk to use in a product. Maintenance will be challenging. I am looking around to see if i can find a light weight ESME or roll up my own.
Best,
Uday.
-------------------------
I do not blog but e-write:
http://uds-web.blogspot.com
--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org> wrote:
From: Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Class Diagram
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 7:46 AM
Regarding the UML diagram, if code is gerenated from the UML, then it
*might* make sense. If not, practice shows that the diagram will be
always outdated.
Analyzing Scala code is fairly complicated because of Scala's
extensibility. Besides, Scala is evolving fast and the syntax is a
moving target. I doubt there are any tools which can generate an UML
diagram from Scala code.
As for opinions about the Scala language, Richard is right- this is
not the rigth place to discuss language viability. Most folks
concentrate on an in-depth analysis of what features they don't like
in Scala rather than trying to guess whether Scala will succeed. Note
that many people claimed that Java would be a failure some 10-15 years
ago- these things are not easy to predict.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Uday Subbarayan
> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Ok. I like the high level design of ESME. It's a good product.
>>
>> Since it's written in Scala, I don't know the internals. I don't even know whether Scala can survive in the long run. I just wrote a blog about it-
>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com/2010/02/what-is-scala.html
>
> If you have questions about scala and its merits, I'd suggest looking
> here: http://www.scala-lang.org/. There are a series of excellent
> blogs about the new language and a comparison with other languages.
> One of the advantages is its compactness.
>
> D.
>
>> Best,
>> -Uday.
>>
>> -------------------------
>>
>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>
>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>
>> --- On Fri, 2/5/10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 6:15 AM
>>
>> Not yet. Definitely would be good to have.
>>
>> I'll look for some tool that generates a class diagram from existing scala code
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Uday Subbarayan
>> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uday.
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>>
>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Class Diagram
Posted by Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>.
Regarding the UML diagram, if code is gerenated from the UML, then it
*might* make sense. If not, practice shows that the diagram will be
always outdated.
Analyzing Scala code is fairly complicated because of Scala's
extensibility. Besides, Scala is evolving fast and the syntax is a
moving target. I doubt there are any tools which can generate an UML
diagram from Scala code.
As for opinions about the Scala language, Richard is right- this is
not the rigth place to discuss language viability. Most folks
concentrate on an in-depth analysis of what features they don't like
in Scala rather than trying to guess whether Scala will succeed. Note
that many people claimed that Java would be a failure some 10-15 years
ago- these things are not easy to predict.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Uday Subbarayan
> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Ok. I like the high level design of ESME. It's a good product.
>>
>> Since it's written in Scala, I don't know the internals. I don't even know whether Scala can survive in the long run. I just wrote a blog about it-
>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com/2010/02/what-is-scala.html
>
> If you have questions about scala and its merits, I'd suggest looking
> here: http://www.scala-lang.org/. There are a series of excellent
> blogs about the new language and a comparison with other languages.
> One of the advantages is its compactness.
>
> D.
>
>> Best,
>> -Uday.
>>
>> -------------------------
>>
>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>
>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>
>> --- On Fri, 2/5/10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 6:15 AM
>>
>> Not yet. Definitely would be good to have.
>>
>> I'll look for some tool that generates a class diagram from existing scala code
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Uday Subbarayan
>> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uday.
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>>
>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Class Diagram
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Uday Subbarayan
<ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Ok. I like the high level design of ESME. It's a good product.
>
> Since it's written in Scala, I don't know the internals. I don't even know whether Scala can survive in the long run. I just wrote a blog about it-
> http://uds-web.blogspot.com/2010/02/what-is-scala.html
If you have questions about scala and its merits, I'd suggest looking
here: http://www.scala-lang.org/. There are a series of excellent
blogs about the new language and a comparison with other languages.
One of the advantages is its compactness.
D.
> Best,
> -Uday.
>
> -------------------------
>
> I do not blog but e-write:
>
> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>
> --- On Fri, 2/5/10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Class Diagram
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 6:15 AM
>
> Not yet. Definitely would be good to have.
>
> I'll look for some tool that generates a class diagram from existing scala code
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Uday Subbarayan
> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Uday.
>>
>> -------------------------
>>
>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>
>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Class Diagram
Posted by Erik Engbrecht <er...@gmail.com>.
Dick,
A lot of UML tools will reverse-engineer Java bytecode in a jar, so
presumably these tools should work with Scala code as well. That being said
I'm not sure how useful the result would be. Mark Harrah has also done some
work on visualizing Scala code but while I think they are useful I don't
think they would answer the mail for someone looking for UML. Of course I'm
not sure how useful pure UML for idiomatic Scala code would be, but that's
another matter.
-Erik
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Not yet. Definitely would be good to have.
>
> I'll look for some tool that generates a class diagram from existing scala
> code
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Uday Subbarayan
> <ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Uday.
> >
> > -------------------------
> >
> > I do not blog but e-write:
> >
> > http://uds-web.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> >
>
--
http://erikengbrecht.blogspot.com/
Re: Class Diagram
Posted by Uday Subbarayan <ud...@yahoo.com>.
Ok. I like the high level design of ESME. It's a good product.
Since it's written in Scala, I don't know the internals. I don't even know whether Scala can survive in the long run. I just wrote a blog about it-
http://uds-web.blogspot.com/2010/02/what-is-scala.html
Best,
-Uday.
-------------------------
I do not blog but e-write:
http://uds-web.blogspot.com
--- On Fri, 2/5/10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Class Diagram
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 6:15 AM
Not yet. Definitely would be good to have.
I'll look for some tool that generates a class diagram from existing scala code
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Uday Subbarayan
<ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
>
> Thanks,
> Uday.
>
> -------------------------
>
> I do not blog but e-write:
>
> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>
>
>
Re: Class Diagram
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
Not yet. Definitely would be good to have.
I'll look for some tool that generates a class diagram from existing scala code
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Uday Subbarayan
<ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is there a class/uml diagram for the server?
>
> Thanks,
> Uday.
>
> -------------------------
>
> I do not blog but e-write:
>
> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>
>
>