mailinglist

[Matthias Fuhrmann <Ma...@stud.uni-hannover.de>]

Hi,

once again, i got mails for this list right into my inbox, rather then
into my SA list folder.
I dont know what you are doing, but please refer to a manual or whatever
and write directly to the list.

here is the mail:

Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:25:15 -0800
From: Kelson Vibber <ke...@speed.net>
Subject: Re: undisclosed-recipients?

At 07:10 AM 3/26/2004, John Ruttenberg wrote:
>I'm sure I'm just ignorant on this topic, but I am curious.  Why is the
>UNDISC_RECIPS rule not scored?  There is this comment in
20_head_tests.cf:
>
>     # NOTE: this is what 100% valid undisclosed-recipients mails look
like.
>     # If this gets a high score, that's a bug!
>
>What does this mean?  I think undisclosed-recipients lists are pretty
spammy,
>actually.  There must be something I don't know.

If you put all the recipients in the BCC field (something you might want
to
do if you regularly forward things to large numbers of friends, so that
their names and email addresses aren't recorded for posterity five
forwardings down the line), the "To" field will be labeled this way.


Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>


regards,
Matthias

Re: mailinglist

[Matthias Fuhrmann <Ma...@stud.uni-hannover.de>]

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Kelson Vibber wrote:

> At 09:36 AM 3/26/2004, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> >once again, i got mails for this list right into my inbox, rather then
> >into my SA list folder.
>
> Try filtering on the List-ID header instead of the To field.  It's more
> reliable.

done this. thanks.
sorry for shouting, but i'm really close to a bad headache.

regards,
Matthias

Re: mailinglist

[Kelson Vibber <ke...@speed.net>]

At 09:36 AM 3/26/2004, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
>once again, i got mails for this list right into my inbox, rather then 
>into my SA list folder.

Try filtering on the List-ID header instead of the To field.  It's more 
reliable.

The message was filtered correctly when I received it.

>I dont know what you are doing

Making an on-topic point that "real" mail might have a To header with 
undisclosed-recipients or recipient-list-suppressed.

Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>