You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/02 02:15:47 UTC
Field Selector in Searcher interface
What are the odds (or reasons against) bubbling up doc(int,
fieldSeclector) to Searcher? I would love to take advantage of the
selective field loading but I am working with MultiSearchers and
Searchers so I cannot count on getReader (in IndexSearcher) for access.
- Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Field Selector in Searcher interface
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Grant,
I don't mind trying my hand at it or making an issue <g> Just wanted to
make sure I wasn't all wet about it first.
- Mark
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> The odds increase significantly in correlation to patches submitted!
> :-) The odds increase slightly by at least filing an "enhancement"
> issue in JIRA. They increase a tiny bit by bringing it up here! I
> may have some time in the not too distant future for this, but we
> always appreciate the help.
>
> Looking briefly at the Searchable interface, it does seem to make
> sense, but that is just my quick glance take on it.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Mar 1, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> What are the odds (or reasons against) bubbling up doc(int,
>> fieldSeclector) to Searcher? I would love to take advantage of the
>> selective field loading but I am working with MultiSearchers and
>> Searchers so I cannot count on getReader (in IndexSearcher) for access.
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Field Selector in Searcher interface
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
The odds increase significantly in correlation to patches
submitted! :-) The odds increase slightly by at least filing an
"enhancement" issue in JIRA. They increase a tiny bit by bringing it
up here! I may have some time in the not too distant future for
this, but we always appreciate the help.
Looking briefly at the Searchable interface, it does seem to make
sense, but that is just my quick glance take on it.
-Grant
On Mar 1, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> What are the odds (or reasons against) bubbling up doc(int,
> fieldSeclector) to Searcher? I would love to take advantage of the
> selective field loading but I am working with MultiSearchers and
> Searchers so I cannot count on getReader (in IndexSearcher) for
> access.
>
> - Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org