You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tika.apache.org by "Lewis John McGibbney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/04/20 23:44:58 UTC
[jira] [Created] (TIKA-1607) Introduce new HashMap
data structure for persitsence of Tika Metadata
Lewis John McGibbney created TIKA-1607:
------------------------------------------
Summary: Introduce new HashMap<String, Object> data structure for persitsence of Tika Metadata
Key: TIKA-1607
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1607
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core, metadata
Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 1.9
I am currently working implementing more comprehensive extraction and enhancement of the Tika support for Phone number extraction and metadata modeling.
Right now we utilize the String[] multivalued support available within Tika to persist phone numbers as
{code}
Metadata: String: String[]
Metadata: phonenumbers: number1, number2, number3, ...
{code}
I would like to propose we extend multi-valued support outside of the String[] paradigm by implementing a more abstract Collection of Objects such that we could consider and implement the phone number use case as follows
{code}
Metadata: String: List<HashMap<String,String>>
{code}
Where Object could be a Collection<>HashMap<String/Property, String/int/long> e.g.
{code}
Metadata: phonenumbers: [(+162648743476: (LibPN-CountryCode : US), (LibPN-NumberType: International), (etc: etc)...), (+1292611054: LibPN-CountryCode : UK), (LibPN-NumberType: International), (etc: etc)...) (etc)]
{code}
There are obvious backwards compatibility issues with this approach... additionally it is a fundamental change to the code Metadata API. I hope that the <String, Object> Mapping however is flexible enough to allow me to model Tika Metadata the way I want.
Any comments folks? Thanks
Lewis
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)