You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Paul Rosen <pa...@performantsoftware.com> on 2009/11/06 23:06:35 UTC

Why doesn't highlighting work on this document?

I have a puzzling case that I don't know how to begin to debug. I 
present results with snippets highlighted, but it is not consistent, and 
it would be nice to know why some documents are returned without any 
highlighted text.

If you go to:

http://www.nines.org/search/saved?user=paul&name=tree

And look at the last entry on the page, (it should be titled "Nashe's 
Red Herring: Epistemologies of the Commodity in Lenten Stuffe (1599)")

you'll see that there is no text returned for that object. I looked in 
the solr index, and there is a fairly long text field, and in the middle 
of that field is:

"which the tree, for example, maintains its form as a tree (wood 
maintains itself in the specific form of the tree because this form is a 
form of"

That is probably what was matched, but why wasn't that text returned?

(I'm using solr 1.4 nightly build from Sept 25)

Re: Why doesn't highlighting work on this document?

Posted by Paul Rosen <pa...@performantsoftware.com>.
That was exactly the problem, thanks!

Jake Brownell wrote:
> By default the highlighter only considers the first 50k of text. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.maxAnalyzedChars
> 
> Obviously the larger the size, the longer highlighting will take. When I get no highlights, I find that the text matched was later in the doc.
> 
> Jake
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Rosen [mailto:paul@performantsoftware.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 4:07 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Why doesn't highlighting work on this document?
> 
> I have a puzzling case that I don't know how to begin to debug. I 
> present results with snippets highlighted, but it is not consistent, and 
> it would be nice to know why some documents are returned without any 
> highlighted text.
> 
> If you go to:
> 
> http://www.nines.org/search/saved?user=paul&name=tree
> 
> And look at the last entry on the page, (it should be titled "Nashe's 
> Red Herring: Epistemologies of the Commodity in Lenten Stuffe (1599)")
> 
> you'll see that there is no text returned for that object. I looked in 
> the solr index, and there is a fairly long text field, and in the middle 
> of that field is:
> 
> "which the tree, for example, maintains its form as a tree (wood 
> maintains itself in the specific form of the tree because this form is a 
> form of"
> 
> That is probably what was matched, but why wasn't that text returned?
> 
> (I'm using solr 1.4 nightly build from Sept 25)


RE: Why doesn't highlighting work on this document?

Posted by Jake Brownell <ja...@Benetech.org>.
By default the highlighter only considers the first 50k of text. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.maxAnalyzedChars

Obviously the larger the size, the longer highlighting will take. When I get no highlights, I find that the text matched was later in the doc.

Jake

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Rosen [mailto:paul@performantsoftware.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 4:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Why doesn't highlighting work on this document?

I have a puzzling case that I don't know how to begin to debug. I 
present results with snippets highlighted, but it is not consistent, and 
it would be nice to know why some documents are returned without any 
highlighted text.

If you go to:

http://www.nines.org/search/saved?user=paul&name=tree

And look at the last entry on the page, (it should be titled "Nashe's 
Red Herring: Epistemologies of the Commodity in Lenten Stuffe (1599)")

you'll see that there is no text returned for that object. I looked in 
the solr index, and there is a fairly long text field, and in the middle 
of that field is:

"which the tree, for example, maintains its form as a tree (wood 
maintains itself in the specific form of the tree because this form is a 
form of"

That is probably what was matched, but why wasn't that text returned?

(I'm using solr 1.4 nightly build from Sept 25)