You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by Hasan Hasan <ha...@trialox.org> on 2013/08/14 05:23:04 UTC

Moving to Git

Hi all,

There are some questions from INFRA in our issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5976
that need to be answered.

1. What are your plans wrt contribs and issues in your SVN tree?
a. Not taking them to git and leaving them RO?
b. Making them additional git repos (i.e. clerezza-contribs)?

I would choose b for contribs. Issues should be moved to branches.

2. Something else?
None from me

What do you think?

Cheers
Hasan

Re: Moving to Git

Posted by Hasan Hasan <ha...@trialox.org>.

Hi all,

I am fine with that. I'll answer to the comment in the issue as stated by
Reto.
If someone can clean the branches except wrhapi, please do so.
Otherwise I'll do it this evening.

Cheers
Hasan



On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>wrote:

> Hi Hasan and all,
>
> I don't think we need the issue-branches. None of it contains active
> development so they can stay read-only in svn. As for the branches I
> suggest to delete everything but the wrhapi branch. I'm fine with the
> clerezza-contribs git repo.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Hasan Hasan <ha...@trialox.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There are some questions from INFRA in our issue
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5976
> > that need to be answered.
> >
> > 1. What are your plans wrt contribs and issues in your SVN tree?
> > a. Not taking them to git and leaving them RO?
> > b. Making them additional git repos (i.e. clerezza-contribs)?
> >
> > I would choose b for contribs. Issues should be moved to branches.
> >
> > 2. Something else?
> > None from me
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Hasan
> >
>

Re: Moving to Git

Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>.

Hi Hasan and all,

I don't think we need the issue-branches. None of it contains active
development so they can stay read-only in svn. As for the branches I
suggest to delete everything but the wrhapi branch. I'm fine with the
clerezza-contribs git repo.

Cheers,
Reto

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Hasan Hasan <ha...@trialox.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> There are some questions from INFRA in our issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5976
> that need to be answered.
>
> 1. What are your plans wrt contribs and issues in your SVN tree?
> a. Not taking them to git and leaving them RO?
> b. Making them additional git repos (i.e. clerezza-contribs)?
>
> I would choose b for contribs. Issues should be moved to branches.
>
> 2. Something else?
> None from me
>
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers
> Hasan
>