You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> on 2016/01/04 22:14:53 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1
Hi,
This is a Apache Flex 4.15 release candidate 1. Please see the
RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/>
Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on
approving a release?", at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release <http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release>
At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
- MD5 and signed packages are correct
- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
- That you can compile from source package
- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
application
Please vote to approve this release:
+1 Approve the release
-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why)
This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
The vote passes if there is:
- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
- More positive votes than negative votes
If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please don't
hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we want to
try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote during
the voting process.
People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
PMC votes.
When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
version you tested the SDK with.
Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
this VOTE thread.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1
Posted by Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>.
Sounds greats, thanks for getting this moving.
-Mark
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> And with 4 +1 binding votes and no other votes this is now an official
> release!
>
> +1 votes:
> Justin Mclean
> Mark Kessler
> Alex Harui
> OmPrakash Muppirala
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped out and contributed.
>
> Justin
[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
And with 4 +1 binding votes and no other votes this is now an official release!
+1 votes:
Justin Mclean
Mark Kessler
Alex Harui
OmPrakash Muppirala
Thanks to everyone who helped out and contributed.
Justin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- source files have Apache header
- no unexpected binaries in source release
- can compile from source
Tested on OS X, and was able to make a working SDK following the instructions (for FB). Tested a few projects including browser, mobile, desktop and browser using RSLs.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1
Posted by Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
-Successful build from source.
-Successfully compiled small test applications.
-README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE fine.
OS: Win7 64bit
Java: 1.8 64bit.
IDE: FlashDevelop 5.0.2
Flash Player: 20
-
-Mark
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:04 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 Binding
>
> Tested the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
> MD5 checksum matches
> Good signature
> Source kit build successful
> Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0 and ant frameworks-rsls.
> Build successful.
> Flash Builder likes the new SDK.
> Recompiled existing large Flex web application, everything runs fine
> Recompiled exisiting large Flex mobile application, everything runs fine
>
> (App seems to be running faster. What did we do??)
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:24 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +0 Binding
> >
> > Testing the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
> > MD5 checksum matches
> > Good signature
> > Source kit build successful
> > Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build
> > successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but
> > Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK'
> and
> > AIR version 16.0 was downloaded.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >> Package
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/apache-flex-sdk-
> >> 4.15.0-src.tar.gz
> >> Java 1.7
> >> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
> >> Source kit signatures match: y
> >> Source kit builds: y
> >> README is ok: y
> >> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> >> NOTICE is ok: y
> >> LICENSE is ok: y
> >> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
> >> No unapproved binaries: y
> >>
> >> Package
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apache-
> >> flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz
> >> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz
> >
> >> Binary kit signatures match: y
> >> NOTICE is ok: y
> >> LICENSE is ok: y
> >> No unapproved licenses or files in jars: y
> >> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
> >> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
> >>
> >> Thanks for being the RM.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 1/4/16, 1:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >This is a Apache Flex 4.15 release candidate 1. Please see the
> >> >RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
> >> >
> >> >The release candidate can be found here;
> >> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/
> >> ><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/>
> >> >
> >> >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements
> on
> >> >approving a release?", at:
> >> >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> ><http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release>
> >> >
> >> >At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> >> >- MD5 and signed packages are correct
> >> >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> >> >- That you can compile from source package
> >> >- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
> >> >- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
> >> >application
> >> >
> >> >Please vote to approve this release:
> >> >+1 Approve the release
> >> >-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >> >
> >> >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >> >
> >> >The vote passes if there is:
> >> >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> >> >- More positive votes than negative votes
> >> >
> >> >If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please
> >> don't
> >> >hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we want
> >> to
> >> >try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
> >> >release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote
> during
> >> >the voting process.
> >> >
> >> >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release
> and
> >> >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how
> >> the
> >> >PMC votes.
> >> >
> >> >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> >> >version you tested the SDK with.
> >> >
> >> >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
> not
> >> >this VOTE thread.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Justin
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
TLF Rendering speed was improved.
On 1/7/16, 5:04 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
<omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1 Binding
>
>Tested the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
>MD5 checksum matches
>Good signature
>Source kit build successful
>Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0 and ant frameworks-rsls.
>Build successful.
>Flash Builder likes the new SDK.
>Recompiled existing large Flex web application, everything runs fine
>Recompiled exisiting large Flex mobile application, everything runs fine
>
>(App seems to be running faster. What did we do??)
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:24 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
><bi...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> +0 Binding
>>
>> Testing the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
>> MD5 checksum matches
>> Good signature
>> Source kit build successful
>> Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build
>> successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but
>> Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK'
>>and
>> AIR version 16.0 was downloaded.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> Package
>>>
>>>
>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/apache-flex-s
>>>dk-
>>> 4.15.0-src.tar.gz
>>> Java 1.7
>>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
>>> Source kit signatures match: y
>>> Source kit builds: y
>>> README is ok: y
>>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
>>> NOTICE is ok: y
>>> LICENSE is ok: y
>>> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
>>> No unapproved binaries: y
>>>
>>> Package
>>>
>>>
>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apac
>>>he-
>>> flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz
>>>
>>><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apa
>>>che-flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz>
>>> Binary kit signatures match: y
>>> NOTICE is ok: y
>>> LICENSE is ok: y
>>> No unapproved licenses or files in jars: y
>>> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
>>> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
>>>
>>> Thanks for being the RM.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 1/4/16, 1:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi,
>>> >
>>> >This is a Apache Flex 4.15 release candidate 1. Please see the
>>> >RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>>> >
>>> >The release candidate can be found here;
>>> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/
>>> ><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/>
>>> >
>>> >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF
>>>requirements on
>>> >approving a release?", at:
>>> >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>> ><http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release>
>>> >
>>> >At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>>> >- MD5 and signed packages are correct
>>> >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>>> >- That you can compile from source package
>>> >- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
>>> >- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
>>> >application
>>> >
>>> >Please vote to approve this release:
>>> >+1 Approve the release
>>> >-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>>> >
>>> >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>>> >
>>> >The vote passes if there is:
>>> >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>>> >- More positive votes than negative votes
>>> >
>>> >If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please
>>> don't
>>> >hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we
>>>want
>>> to
>>> >try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
>>> >release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote
>>>during
>>> >the voting process.
>>> >
>>> >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release
>>>and
>>> >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how
>>> the
>>> >PMC votes.
>>> >
>>> >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>>> >version you tested the SDK with.
>>> >
>>> >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
>>>not
>>> >this VOTE thread.
>>> >
>>> >Thanks,
>>> >Justin
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
+1 Binding
Tested the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
MD5 checksum matches
Good signature
Source kit build successful
Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0 and ant frameworks-rsls.
Build successful.
Flash Builder likes the new SDK.
Recompiled existing large Flex web application, everything runs fine
Recompiled exisiting large Flex mobile application, everything runs fine
(App seems to be running faster. What did we do??)
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:24 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +0 Binding
>
> Testing the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
> MD5 checksum matches
> Good signature
> Source kit build successful
> Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build
> successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but
> Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK' and
> AIR version 16.0 was downloaded.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Package
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/apache-flex-sdk-
>> 4.15.0-src.tar.gz
>> Java 1.7
>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
>> Source kit signatures match: y
>> Source kit builds: y
>> README is ok: y
>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
>> NOTICE is ok: y
>> LICENSE is ok: y
>> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
>> No unapproved binaries: y
>>
>> Package
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apache-
>> flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz
>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz>
>> Binary kit signatures match: y
>> NOTICE is ok: y
>> LICENSE is ok: y
>> No unapproved licenses or files in jars: y
>> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
>> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
>>
>> Thanks for being the RM.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 1/4/16, 1:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >This is a Apache Flex 4.15 release candidate 1. Please see the
>> >RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>> >
>> >The release candidate can be found here;
>> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/
>> ><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/>
>> >
>> >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on
>> >approving a release?", at:
>> >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> ><http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release>
>> >
>> >At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> >- MD5 and signed packages are correct
>> >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> >- That you can compile from source package
>> >- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
>> >- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
>> >application
>> >
>> >Please vote to approve this release:
>> >+1 Approve the release
>> >-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>> >
>> >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>> >
>> >The vote passes if there is:
>> >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>> >- More positive votes than negative votes
>> >
>> >If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please
>> don't
>> >hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we want
>> to
>> >try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
>> >release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote during
>> >the voting process.
>> >
>> >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
>> >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how
>> the
>> >PMC votes.
>> >
>> >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>> >version you tested the SDK with.
>> >
>> >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
>> >this VOTE thread.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Justin
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
+0 Binding
Testing the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
MD5 checksum matches
Good signature
Source kit build successful
Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build
successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but
Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK' and
AIR version 16.0 was downloaded.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> +1
> Package
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/apache-flex-sdk-
> 4.15.0-src.tar.gz
> Java 1.7
> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
> Source kit signatures match: y
> Source kit builds: y
> README is ok: y
> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
> No unapproved binaries: y
>
> Package
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apache-
> flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz>
> Binary kit signatures match: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or files in jars: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
>
> Thanks for being the RM.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 1/4/16, 1:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >This is a Apache Flex 4.15 release candidate 1. Please see the
> >RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
> >
> >The release candidate can be found here;
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/
> ><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/>
> >
> >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on
> >approving a release?", at:
> >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> ><http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release>
> >
> >At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> >- MD5 and signed packages are correct
> >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> >- That you can compile from source package
> >- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
> >- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
> >application
> >
> >Please vote to approve this release:
> >+1 Approve the release
> >-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >
> >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >
> >The vote passes if there is:
> >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> >- More positive votes than negative votes
> >
> >If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please don't
> >hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we want to
> >try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
> >release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote during
> >the voting process.
> >
> >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
> >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
> >PMC votes.
> >
> >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> >version you tested the SDK with.
> >
> >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> >this VOTE thread.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Justin
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/apache-flex-sdk-
4.15.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unapproved binaries: y
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apache-
flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz
Binary kit signatures match: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or files in jars: y
No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
Thanks for being the RM.
-Alex
On 1/4/16, 1:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This is a Apache Flex 4.15 release candidate 1. Please see the
>RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>
>The release candidate can be found here;
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/
><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/>
>
>Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on
>approving a release?", at:
>http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
><http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release>
>
>At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>- MD5 and signed packages are correct
>- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>- That you can compile from source package
>- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
>- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
>application
>
>Please vote to approve this release:
>+1 Approve the release
>-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
>This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
>The vote passes if there is:
>- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>- More positive votes than negative votes
>
>If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please don't
>hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we want to
>try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
>release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote during
>the voting process.
>
>People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
>vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
>PMC votes.
>
>When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>version you tested the SDK with.
>
>Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
>this VOTE thread.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin