Re: JSON and YAML property sources

[Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>]

This may be a little early, but especially should the JSON stakeholders who
filed other standards accept what Google proposes, JSonett may become
relevant, too.
An interesting overview of configuration languages (including Apache config
files mainly in the httpd server) can also be found there:
http://google.github.io/jsonnet/doc/comparisons.html

Werner

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:

> They all are basically map based. Even if you read those from the
> database. So the map layer is really very slim. Not sure if it makes sense
> to extract this.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Friday, 2 January 2015, 0:49, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > I'm curious, are these really distinct sources?  Would it make more
> sense
> > to have a map based source that can read these value files in a
> prescribed
> > format?
> >
> > On Thu Jan 01 2015 at 1:58:49 PM Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>  Perhaps have a look at the dormant part. I added an extensions
> multimodule
> >>  there. You can resctivate the poms and add you new projects ad a
> starter...
> >>  Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net> schrieb am Do., 1. Jan.
> > 2015
> >>  um 19:51:
> >>
> >>  > Hi,
> >>  >
> >>  > if no one objects I will start in the next days to work on the JSON
> > and
> >>  > YAML property sources.
> >>  >
> >>  > How do we want to handles this extras? By adding two additional
> > modules
> >>  > to the project besides core?
> >>  >
> >>  > Bye,
> >>  >
> >>  > Oliver
> >>  >
> >>  > --
> >>  > N Oliver B. Fischer
> >>  > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> >>  > P +49 30 44793251
> >>  > M +49 178 7903538
> >>  > E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> >>  > S oliver.b.fischer
> >>  > J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> >>  > X http://xing.to/obf
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>