You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Richard Chamberlain (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2010/02/17 11:08:55 UTC
[jira] Commented: (SUREFIRE-602) Unable to run tests using a
different JVM unless using forkMode="once" (always and pertest do not work)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=210424#action_210424 ]
Richard Chamberlain commented on SUREFIRE-602:
----------------------------------------------
This is similar to SUREFIRE-510, but warrants a separate issue as it is a different config option
> Unable to run tests using a different JVM unless using forkMode="once" (always and pertest do not work)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUREFIRE-602
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-602
> Project: Maven Surefire
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: process forking
> Affects Versions: 2.4.3
> Environment: Maven version: 2.0.10
> Java version: 1.5.0_08
> OS name: "windows xp" version: "5.1" arch: "x86" Family: "windows"
> Reporter: Richard Chamberlain
>
> Hi,
> Our build farm uses java 1.5.0_08. We have written some code in java 6. We can get it to compile in java 6, but running tests wasn't that easy. We originally set the config to:
> <plugin>
> <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
> <version>2.4.3</version>
> <configuration>
> <redirectTestOutputToFile>true</redirectTestOutputToFile>
> <jvm>D:\buildTools\jdk\1.6.0\bin\java.exe</jvm>
> <forkMode>pertest</forkMode>
> <includes>
> <include>**/*Behavior.java</include>
> </includes>
> </configuration>
> </plugin>
> But this didn't work reporting a bad version in class file error. When we set forkMode to "once", it worked.
> After further investigation
> - the jvm property is only picked up when forkMode is "once"
> - it does not work when forkmode is "pertest" or "always"
> This was extremely painful to work out what the bug was. Can I also suggest that you print out the JVM version and any parameters in the debug (mvn -X) output?
> Thanks,
> Richard
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira