You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@libcloud.apache.org by anthony shaw <an...@apache.org> on 2016/12/27 20:33:32 UTC
[dev] [DISCUSS] Python 3.6 support
I just merged a PR to add Python 3.6.0 to the build, now that it's released. The build failed the first time, the function spec of showwarning in the warnings.py changed, but we only used it within a test module so I would say it works fine in 1.5.0 release bits
We can say that 3.6 is experimental in 1.5 and then have it as supported in 1.6? What do people think?
Also, a few of us need to use 3.6 in anger and check for any issues.
Regards
Anthony Shaw
Re: [dev] [DISCUSS] Python 3.6 support
Posted by Allard Hoeve <al...@gmail.com>.
Yes please!
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 21:33 anthony shaw <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> I just merged a PR to add Python 3.6.0 to the build, now that it's
> released. The build failed the first time, the function spec of showwarning
> in the warnings.py changed, but we only used it within a test module so I
> would say it works fine in 1.5.0 release bits
> We can say that 3.6 is experimental in 1.5 and then have it as supported
> in 1.6? What do people think?
> Also, a few of us need to use 3.6 in anger and check for any issues.
> Regards
> Anthony Shaw
>
Re: [dev] [DISCUSS] Python 3.6 support
Posted by Eric Johnson <er...@apache.org>.
Switching to 3.6 now and putting on my grumpy hat in case anger is really
needed.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Tomaz Muraus <to...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sounds good to me :)
>
> On Dec 27, 2016 9:33 PM, "anthony shaw" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I just merged a PR to add Python 3.6.0 to the build, now that it's
> released. The build failed the first time, the function spec of showwarning
> in the warnings.py changed, but we only used it within a test module so I
> would say it works fine in 1.5.0 release bits
> We can say that 3.6 is experimental in 1.5 and then have it as supported in
> 1.6? What do people think?
> Also, a few of us need to use 3.6 in anger and check for any issues.
> Regards
> Anthony Shaw
>
Re: [dev] [DISCUSS] Python 3.6 support
Posted by Tomaz Muraus <to...@apache.org>.
Sounds good to me :)
On Dec 27, 2016 9:33 PM, "anthony shaw" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
I just merged a PR to add Python 3.6.0 to the build, now that it's
released. The build failed the first time, the function spec of showwarning
in the warnings.py changed, but we only used it within a test module so I
would say it works fine in 1.5.0 release bits
We can say that 3.6 is experimental in 1.5 and then have it as supported in
1.6? What do people think?
Also, a few of us need to use 3.6 in anger and check for any issues.
Regards
Anthony Shaw