You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by "Craig R. McClanahan" <cr...@apache.org> on 2001/07/17 21:19:56 UTC
[PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release on Thursday 07/19/2001
I would like to propose that we create a "beta 6" release of Tomcat 4.0 on
Thursday, July 19, 2001 (with me as release manager). This release will
incorporate:
- Fix for the security vulnerability (already present in the
20010717 nightly build).
- Updates to conform to Servlet 2.3 PFD3 and JSP 1.2 PFD3 requirements.
- New webapp class loader that operates faster, and fixes many bugs
present in the previous class loader.
- Fixes for all current issues reported against the J2EE 1.3-beta-2
reference implementation (which includes code that essentially
matched Tomcat 4.0-beta-5) that are relevant to Tomcat.
- Fixes for nearly all of the issues reported in Bugzilla against
Tomcat 4.0-beta-5.
- Beta-quality implementation of the mod_webapp connector.
---------- SNIP HERE ----------
Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
[ ] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
[ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
[ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
[ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons and/or workarounds)
Craig McClanahan
Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release on Thursday 07/19/2001
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
> Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
> [X] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
> [ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
> [ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
> [ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons and/or workarounds)
>
> Craig McClanahan
Basicly in mod_webapp.
Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release on Thursday 07/19/2001
Posted by Martin Dengler <ro...@xades.com>.
For what it's worth as a non-committer...
>Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
>[X] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
>[ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
>[ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
>[ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons and/or workarounds)
Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release on Thursday 07/19/2001
Posted by Amy Roh <am...@apache.org>.
> Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
> [X] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
> [ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
> [ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
> [ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons and/or workarounds)
Amy
Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release on Thursday 07/19/2001
Posted by Glenn Nielsen <gl...@voyager.apg.more.net>.
> ---------- SNIP HERE ----------
>
> Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
> [X] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
> [ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
> [ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
> [ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons and/or workarounds)
>
> Craig McClanahan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen glenn@more.net | /* Spelin donut madder |
MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. |
Missouri Research and Education Network | */ |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release on Thursday 07/19/2001
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
> Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
> [*] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
> [ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
> [ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
> [ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons and/or workarounds)
Remy
RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release on Thursday 07/19/2001
Posted by Marc Saegesser <ma...@apropos.com>.
> Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
> [ ] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
> [X] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
> [ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
> [ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons and/or workarounds)
>
Marc Saegesser
Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release on Thursday 07/19/2001
Posted by "Pier P. Fumagalli" <pi...@betaversion.org>.
Craig R. McClanahan at craigmcc@apache.org wrote:
>
> - Beta-quality implementation of the mod_webapp connector.
>
> Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
> [X] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
> [ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
> [ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
> [ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons and/or workarounds)
Pier
Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release on Thursday 07/19/2001
Posted by Jon Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 7/17/01 12:19 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
> [*] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
> [ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
> [ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
> [ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons and/or workarounds)
>
> Craig McClanahan
My +1 is based on my continued debugging and testing of the classloader. :-)
-jon